Current events discussion

"Kiersten Pels, the Republican National Committee's national press secretary, told Newsweek, "Democrats have made it clear that if they regain power, their agenda won’t be bringing down costs or securing the border — it will be launching partisan impeachment crusades against President Trump and his administration. If Democrats take back Congress, Americans can expect obstruction, impeachments, and government shutdowns instead of the safer streets and lower prices they voted for last year.”

Hmmm, the MAGATS claim that Trump already brought prices down and secured the border. Why would the Democrats have to make those things their agenda, if Trump already did it all?

Pretty contradictory words, there.
Too bad the MAGATS are not bright enough to see the lies.
Do you really want to know what the dems will do if they make back into power?

Let's allow Hunter Biden to tell us what would happen.

 
Hey Rob,
I'm still waiting for you comment on my proving you said Trump was a convicted racist.
Still waiting for you to prove it.

As usual, you failed to pony up any evidence or facts.
The post that you shared offered no proof whatsoever

It went something like this:
1766540463010.png


And here is post #26,681.
Please show us all where, in the post, I said that Trump was convicted of ****.

Or, go ahead and fail again, like you seem to always do:
1766540563971.png
 
Last edited:
Hmm.. Gee IDK mister?

Maybe because that is all Democrats do is lie? Or maybe because they know Democrat voters are the dumbest MF'ers on the planet and if they tell them some dumb shit they will believe it?

These are the same people that wanted Kamala to run the country...

Use your brain a little bit.. You can't see it?
Nothing you said above speaks to the part that YOU added emphasis to.

Are you saying the Democrats are lying when MAGATS (and Trump) claim that Trump brought costs down and secured the border?

"When I took office, inflation was the worst in 48 years, and some would say in the history of our country. Inflation has stopped, wages are up, prices are down, our nation is strong." - Trump 12/17/2025

"In record time we have secured the border, taken the fight to cartels and arrested thousands upon thousands of criminal illegal aliens." -Kristi Noem

I would have to say that anyone who believes the above bullshit has to be one of the dumbest MF'ers on the planet. Are you one of them?
Use your brain a bit. Can you see that it's bullshit, or are you actually falling for it?
 
Hmm.. Gee IDK mister?

Maybe because that is all Democrats do is lie? Or maybe because they know Democrat voters are the dumbest MF'ers on the planet and if they tell them some dumb shit they will believe it?

These are the same people that wanted Kamala to run the country...

Use your brain a little bit.. You can't see it?
People that use their brains even a little bit aren't democrats.
 
Still waiting for you to prove it.

As usual, you failed to pony up any evidence or facts.
The post that you shared offered no proof whatsoever

It went something like this:
View attachment 69671

And here is post #26,681.
Please show us all where, in the post, I said that Trump was convicted of ****.

Or, go ahead and fail again, like you seem to always do:
View attachment 69672
Again, here is what I quoted your posted where you said it was court decision to call Trump a racist.

If the "Court" made that decision, then that means he was convicted. I'm going to give you the benefit of a doubt that you are too ignorant to know what a "Courts Decision" actually means. A "Courts Decision" means you were either convicted or not convicted. If it's the court's decision that you are guilty, then that means you are now convicted.

The "Court" is the individual, or individuals, who have the responsibility of providing the verdict. In Trump's case, the Jury had that responsibility. Not the judge. The jury did not say he was guilty of ****. Therefore, he was not convicted. There, now you are smarter.

Sooo... by you saying it was a "court decision," you are stating he was convicted.

Proof provided!!!
 
Again, here is what I quoted your posted where you said it was court decision to call Trump a racist.

If the "Court" made that decision, then that means he was convicted. I'm going to give you the benefit of a doubt that you are too ignorant to know what a "Courts Decision" actually means. A "Courts Decision" means you were either convicted or not convicted. If it's the court's decision that you are guilty, then that means you are now convicted.

The "Court" is the individual, or individuals, who have the responsibility of providing the verdict. In Trump's case, the Jury had that responsibility. Not the judge. The jury did not say he was guilty of ****. Therefore, he was not convicted. There, now you are smarter.

Sooo... by you saying it was a "court decision," you are stating he was convicted.

Proof provided!!!
You should probably learn more about what you speak of, before you speak of it.

Your attempt at a logical interpretation of my post in order to prove your claim is a failure, because you use false presumptions to reach your conclusion.

A court decision is not necessarily a conviction, even when the decision is that someone is guilty of something.
A judge can be referred to as the court, because the judge is a direct representative of the authority of the judicial system.
The judge is the ultimate decision-maker, and can add to a decision of a jury, take away from the decision of a jury, nullify their decision altogether.

Try again.
Show me where I said that Trump was convicted of ****.
 
Last edited:
You should ask that guy on here who claimed he had risked no money when he bet on Rousey to lose.
Obviously has the inside line on sports.
Oh, you mean when I said this? I didn't say I risked no money. I bet $2k. Why? Confidence in Holm and her abilities. I have watched the UFC from almost the beginning and it is not hard to spot real talent. I see you are still lying about what people say though. Have you ever given a reason as to why you keep doing that?

Rousey.jpg
 
Oh, you mean when I said this? I didn't say I risked no money. I bet $2k. Why? Confidence in Holm and her abilities. I have watched the UFC from almost the beginning and it is not hard to spot real talent. I see you are still lying about what people say though. Have you ever given a reason as to why you keep doing that?

View attachment 69673
While we're on the subject of sports betting.....
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,709
Views
443,934
Last reply date
Last reply from
ThxOne
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top