Current events discussion

I didn't try to put words in your mouth. This "?" symbol following a sentence means it's a question.
You've done it several times, lately.
This is that statement that lead me ask the question in the place and offers no clarification whatsoever.
It doesn't clarify that I am posting about the hypocrisy m, and not the specific infractions?

Ok, I'll clarify: I'm posting about the hypocrisy, and not the specific infractions.
The hypocrisy of people who don't practice what they preach, and what they demand others practice.

Make sense?
It's impossible to make laws in a moral vacuum, so religion will always play a role.
It shouldn't. Making laws based on belief in fairy tales is morally wrong.
Religiosos are regularly violating their religious code? Since you were on a pedo kick, I have say that that cohort is less than miniscule and they don't maintain their good stance in the eyes of most people. If we're discussing the code as in the Bible, God understands people are less than perfect and forgives our sins.
Yes, religiosos are regularly violating their moral code. Seeing more and more if it every day.
Maybe if they stop exposing it, it will happen less?

Ahhh, god forgives sins, so sin away.
Cheap grace.
 
Oops. Probably someone else using his device.


1754009554854.png
 
More wars have been started in the name of religion than anything else.
Many of the people they are trying to convert are illiterate and penniless. Once "converted", it costs them SOMETHING.
Do a little research on the CRUSADES if you want to see how "nice" conversion is.

Tell me, if god is omnipotent and anyone who doesn't know of is banished to purgatory after death, why does god need missionaries to spread the word and convert people? Not omnipotent enough to get the word out? What about people that are shut off from the rest off the world? **** 'em?
So if people are illiterate and or don't have access to the knowledge.... would not the missionaries be prudent? You are killing your argument because you want to be angry and not like the missionaries.
And ther you go with the slander again. Care to prove how I am "making up fraud" for the people I investigate?
Or are you just doing your special "out of the box" thinking again, ignoring the FACT that the people I prosecute provide the Clear and Convincing evidence that is used against them, per CFR 273.16?
6:1 profit. Greed is a mutha trucka!!
People who get busted for breaking the law have chosen their punishment, which existed before they broke the law.
Do you cry "unfair" if you jump off a building and break a leg, even though you KNOW gravity exists and the human body breaks on high-speed impact?
Do you weep for all the jailed criminals who got caught and are now being punished?
Do you think it's wrong that there are laws and punishments, and instead we should all just do whatever we want?
Wow, so ignore the fact that YOU still chose the profession of hurting people. Just because they broke the law you want to make sure you are in there to stick it to them. So it is your choice not to be a helpful person. Why?
You seem to be REALLY offended by what I do. Lemme ask you: Did you get busted and punished for stealing welfare benefits at some point in time, and felt it was unfair?
Anything I have done was dealt with accordingly and the punishments were justified. That does not make me bitter towards the law. Tell me why you would rather hurt people than help them though.
 
So if people are illiterate and or don't have access to the knowledge.... would not the missionaries be prudent? You are killing your argument because you want to be angry and not like the missionaries.
They would be prudent if they were helping with literacy and access to knowledge.
Teaching them fairy tales and giving them MP3 players that tells them Bible stories does neither.

6:1 profit. Greed is a mutha trucka!!
Sounds like you still don't understand about recoupment and confession of judgement.
We don't take back $6 for every $1 a person steals. We take back what they steal.
And we are recovering $6 for every $1 it takes to employ us to find the theft and recover the money.

Clear, or are you still utterly lost in the math concept?

Wow, so ignore the fact that YOU still chose the profession of hurting people. Just because they broke the law you want to make sure you are in there to stick it to them. So it is your choice not to be a helpful person. Why?
Ahhh, "hurting people" by making them follow the law, and punishing them for breaking the law.
HORRIBLE. You must really hate the police, and want to defund them. Right?
When you used to steal stuff, did you get caught and feel it was unfair? Just a way for someone to "hurt" you?
Anything I have done was dealt with accordingly and the punishments were justified. That does not make me bitter towards the law. Tell me why you would rather hurt people than help them though.
Ahhhh, so it was fair for YOU to get caught and punished, but unfair for OTHERS?
Why is unfair for thieves other than you to get caught and punished? Why are you bitter that THEY get caught and punished?
Or is it only the thieves caught and punished by MY work?
 
Pretty sure you said blue states offer more aid and red are on the most aid. Correct?
Incorrect. Blue states put more money into the federal coffers than red states. More red states are federally dependent than blue states.

Of the top 4 welfare-taking states, 3 are red. Of the bottom 4 welfare-taking staes, three are blue.
Of the top 16 states that get back more than $1 for each dollar they contribute, 10 are red.
Of the bottom 16 states getting back less than $1 for each dollar they contribute, 11 are blue.


1754016174340.png

1754016272463.png
 
They would be prudent if they were helping with literacy and access to knowledge.
Teaching them fairy tales and giving them MP3 players that tells them Bible stories does neither.
Why would you assume they are not teaching to read and write?
Sounds like you still don't understand about recoupment and confession of judgement.
We don't take back $6 for every $1 a person steals. We take back what they steal.
And we are recovering $6 for every $1 it takes to employ us to find the theft and recover the money.

Clear, or are you still utterly lost in the math concept?
No, it makes sense... you have to create fraud or you don't make money. It's simple, no fraud, no job.
Ahhh, "hurting people" by making them follow the law, and punishing them for breaking the law.
HORRIBLE. You must really hate the police, and want to defund them. Right?
When you used to steal stuff, did you get caught and feel it was unfair? Just a way for someone to "hurt" you?

Ahhhh, so it was fair for YOU to get caught and punished, but unfair for OTHERS?
Why is unfair for thieves other than you to get caught and punished? Why are you bitter that THEY get caught and punished?
Or is it only the thieves caught and punished by MY work?
You are choosing not to help people. WHY?
 
Incorrect. Blue states put more money into the federal coffers than red states. More red states are federally dependent than blue states.

Of the top 4 welfare-taking states, 3 are red. Of the bottom 4 welfare-taking staes, three are blue.
Of the top 16 states that get back more than $1 for each dollar they contribute, 10 are red.
Of the bottom 16 states getting back less than $1 for each dollar they contribute, 11 are blue.


View attachment 66833
View attachment 66834
So red states are on the most welfare. Like I just said. Blue states offer more aid. Like I said. How do you turn a confirmation into an argument Rob????
 
Last edited:
Anyway, you just clarified why you do your job. Red states (Republicans) on more welfare so you will do anything in your power to make them suffer. So much so you found a job that allows you to punish them for not voting like you and you get paid to do it. I bet you love your job more now that Trump is President and you can get some revenge on these poor people. Or as you would call them... Scumbags.
 
Last edited:
So red states are on the most welfare. Like I just said. Blue states offer more aid. Like I said. How do you turn a confirmation into an argument Rob????
Blue states do not offer any aid. They pay into the federal coffers and that money is then distributed.
There is a difference.

Saying that blue states offer aid to red states is like saying that you offer aid to Ukraine.
You don't. You pay your taxes, and the Feds decide what to do with them.
 
Blue states do not offer any aid. They pay into the federal coffers and that money is then distributed.
There is a difference.

Saying that blue states offer aid to red states is like saying that you offer aid to Ukraine.
You don't. You pay your taxes, and the Feds decide what to do with them.
I did not say offer aid to red states. You love arguing way too much.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,948
Views
488,125
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top