Trump being Trump

[Jimi77 5,000+ posts]

I just watched 4 interviews with Mayor Bass and Newsom. Not once did any of them denounce the riots and looting. All they kept talking about is how bad ICE and Trump are. If they really cared, you would think they would at least put a message out and tell all these rioters that they need to stop or they will be prosecuted. That's the idiotic left for you. Don't blame yourself... Just pull crap out of our butt to blame someone else. If the Republicans did this, the dems would call it an insurrection.

As I said, J6 lasted 3 hours, miscellaneous Leftie Riots last 3 days if not 3 weeks.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

As I said, J6 lasted 3 hours, miscellaneous Leftie Riots last 3 days if not 3 weeks.

It'll be all summer...yet again

 

[Jimi77 5,000+ posts]

Explain how Kamala wasn't "democratically selected".

Really? You need an explanation for this? We all saw what happened, we all witnessed it in real time and you somehow concluded that Kamala was "democratically selected." You don't have TDS, you are just plain deranged.

Nothing but "because ThxOne said so".
A pathetic, self-entitled stance, as usual.

Of course "because Thx said so" isn't an acceptable answer.

Thx: "I never said Sleepy Joe is literal."
Rob: 50 posts about the literal meaning of Sleepy...

 

[Jimi77 5,000+ posts]

The PEOPLE decide who runs the country. Liberals and Democrats have taken away our right to choose, our ability to choose by telling us who we will vote for. THAT is not how it works. That is NOT how the COTUS was written.

You keep using the word fail. It's your most used word because that is your life and you are pissed about it but to lazy to change it. Just sit around cucked in the corner being a do boy for the far left.

I don't know if there is anything in the COTUS preventing the bait & switch. Maybe some other election law addresses this issue. That said whether it violates COTUS or not, it certainly goes against our democratic underpinnings. It's an interesting way for a populist to get nominated and then hand things over to the party's preferred candidate. Maybe the Kamala approach is what they learned from the Sanders/Clinton fiasco.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Maybe the Kamala approach is what they learned from the Sanders/Clinton fiasco.

I still believe Sanders would've beat Trump...not that I wanted him to

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

We should get Newsom in the White House. You see what a bang up job he is doing with California.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

We should get Newsom in the White House. You see what a bang up job he is doing with California.

He'll run on this

 

[Jimi77 5,000+ posts]

I still believe Sanders would've beat Trump...not that I wanted him to

I know Sanders people that flipped to Trump because they wanted an outsider. I don't think they'd vote Bernie now given that Bernie has been exposed as an insider.

 

[Jimi77 5,000+ posts]

He'll run on this

The DNC is still in the grips of TDS. I think he wants the riots and Trump's response so he can run as the anti-Trump candidate. The DNC still seems to stand for little to nothing outside of oppose Trump.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

The DNC is still in the grips of TDS. I think he wants the riots and Trump's response so he can run as the anti-Trump candidate. The DNC still seems to stand for little to nothing outside of oppose Trump.

If Trump sends the marines in (I think he was going to today) that'll be part of the platform for the dems...if Trump doesn't then the lack of response to the riots will be the platform

 

[RobGMN 5,000+ posts]

Really? You need an explanation for this? We all saw what happened, we all witnessed it in real time and you somehow concluded that Kamala was "democratically selected." You don't have TDS, you are just plain deranged.

"We all saw" that she was selected by the DNC, as they are allowed to do.
ThxOne tried to claim it was unfair, unethical, illegal, immoral, and then showed NOTHING that supports his claims.

I have asked you support the claims, and you have failed to do so.

Does TSS not allow you guys to provide any facts or evidence that supports your claims? Is it a TSS thing to just blurt out your beliefs/opinions/wishes, and demand that they be accepted as facts?
"We all know" or "we all saw" are not facts or evidence that support your claims.

So, can you just tell me what laws or rules were broken when the DNC chose Kamala to be the candidate?

Of course "because Thx said so" isn't an acceptable answer.

Exactly. But it seems to be all he can ever offer.
Years later, he demands we accept that bones do not have nerves in them BECAUSE HE SAID SO.

Thx: "I never said Sleepy Joe is literal."
Rob: 50 posts about the literal meaning of Sleepy...

ThxOne is the one who posted a DEFINTION of the term "sleepy" that absolutely says it has to do with sleep. He posted it to support the meaning of the moniker "sleepy Joe". Did he post the definition of "sleepy" in order to say the definition has nothing to do with the "sleepy Joe"?

That would be like me posting a definition of "hot" that describes temperature, and then saying "I meant the woman who is sexy and has a great body". WHY post the definition regarding temperature?

Or is this just to be expected from the guy who says "in" does not mean "in" per the dictionary definition?

 

[Jimi77 5,000+ posts]

If Trump sends the marines in (I think he was going to today) that'll be part of the platform for the dems...if Trump doesn't then the lack of response to the riots will be the platform

Schrodinger's Liberal - damned if you do, damned if you don't.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"We all saw" that she was selected by the DNC, as they are allowed to do.
ThxOne tried to claim it was unfair, unethical, illegal, immoral, and then showed NOTHING that supports his claims.

Moron.

I have asked you support the claims, and you have failed to do so.

Does TSS not allow you guys to provide any facts or evidence that supports your claims? Is it a TSS thing to just blurt out your beliefs/opinions/wishes, and demand that they be accepted as facts?
"We all know" or "we all saw" are not facts or evidence that support your claims.

Does TDS not allow you to accept evidence that disproves your claims?

So, can you just tell me what laws or rules were broken when the DNC chose Kamala to be the candidate?

Can you tell me what a ****** is for?

Exactly. But it seems to be all he can ever offer.
Years later, he demands we accept that bones do not have nerves in them BECAUSE HE SAID SO.

I haven't demanded anything. If I recall, you are the one constantly begging for facts, proof, evidence.

ThxOne is the one who posted a DEFINTION of the term "sleepy" that absolutely says it has to do with sleep. He posted it to support the meaning of the moniker "sleepy Joe". Did he post the definition of "sleepy" in order to say the definition has nothing to do with the "sleepy Joe"?

See, now you are changing what you said. First you said sleepy DESCRIBES sleep. Now it's just "has to do with sleep". Tap dancer.

That would be like me posting a definition of "hot" that describes temperature, and then saying "I meant the woman who is sexy and has a great body". WHY post the definition regarding temperature?

Show me the variation and definition of the word hot that refers to women.

Or is this just to be expected from the guy who says "in" does not mean "in" per the dictionary definition?

Listen Rob, you will always be at odds with people you speak with because you can't comprehend jack **** so your smooth brain reverts to taking everything literal. You're a sub-90 i.q. who acts like he is smart because he can Google.

 

[RobGMN 5,000+ posts]

Moron.

So, you can;t supoort your own claims.
Again.

Does TDS not allow you to accept evidence that disproves your claims?

Your TSS requires that you fail to provide evidence.
"Because ThxOne SAYS so" is not evidence

Can you tell me what a ****** is for?

Yet another bad job at deflecting.
It deflecting, backpedaling, tapdancing away from the facts, all you are capable of?

I haven't demanded anything. If I recall, you are the one constantly begging for facts, proof, evidence.

You insist that you are correct, and have demanded many times that I answer your inane and irrelevant questions.
You demand that your beliefs and opinions be demanded as facts, without being questioned.

See, now you are changing what you said. First you said sleepy DESCRIBES sleep. Now it's just "has to do with sleep". Tap dancer.

YOU posted the very definition of the word. It's an adjective that describes sleep.
Then you denied that it's an adjective that describes sleep.
Did you forget that? Were you drunk or on shrooms when you did so? Did the frog in your pocket post it? Was it your babysitter and not you, perhaps?

If you don't like the definition proving you wrong, then why post it?

Show me the variation and definition of the word hot that refers to women.

hot - Slang.

1. sexually aroused; lustful.
2. sexy; attractive.
   
   

   Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words

   The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!

   www.dictionary.com
   
   

Listen Rob, you will always be at odds with people you speak with because you can't comprehend jack **** so your smooth brain reverts to taking everything literal. You're a sub-90 i.q. who acts like he is smart because he can Google.

"Comprehend".
Tell us more about your inability to comprehend literally dozens of things discussed here.
Explain to us how "in your wheelhouse" regarding someone's capabilities, describes a boat.
Tell us how "in" doesn't mean "in" when it comes to medical science.
Tell us all about how "ironic" is not used to describe something that is the opposite of what is expected.
Tell us how "mono" means more than one.
Tell us how the CFR is just "some ********" that is not relevant to the law.
Tell us how the FEC decides a person must be selected as a POTUS candidate by their party in the spring.
Tell us how Kentucky gas prices do not change as the national average goes up or down.
Tell us how averages are only used for lazy or nefarious purposes.
Tell us how a rest stop is not allowed to have gasoline sold for automotive use.
Tell us how oil drilling permits get issued without a land lease in place.
Tell us how gas prices rose due to panic -buying of toilet paper, months before the panic occurred.
Tell us how a salaried worker's pay changes based on their weekly production.
Tell us how real pricing doesn't matter when it comes to a person's expenses over time.

And that's the tip of the iceberg of **** you can't begin to comprehend.

 

[Jimi77 5,000+ posts]

"We all saw" that she was selected by the DNC, as they are allowed to do.
ThxOne tried to claim it was unfair, unethical, illegal, immoral, and then showed NOTHING that supports his claims.

I have asked you support the claims, and you have failed to do so.

Does TSS not allow you guys to provide any facts or evidence that supports your claims? Is it a TSS thing to just blurt out your beliefs/opinions/wishes, and demand that they be accepted as facts?
"We all know" or "we all saw" are not facts or evidence that support your claims.

So, can you just tell me what laws or rules were broken when the DNC chose Kamala to be the candidate?

You just post on here to argue about the most meaningless crap. Thx thinks the bait and switch was unethical, is he not allowed to think bait & switch tactics are unethical? The fact that you even ask him to "prove" that bait and switch is immoral is astonishing.

I didn't support Thx arguments regarding Kamala; specifically, I posted that I don't see where COTUS prevents the bait and switch, that the GOP could use a similar tactic and that I don't know if there is a FEC law forbidding the bait and switch. So why are you asking me to defend positions that I've never taken and even questioned??? You've lost touch with reality. I'm going to note that when I responded to Thx that I don't see where the COTUS prevents the bait & switch, he didn't respond with pages of "yes it does, where's your proof, etc." He just accepts that I don't think the COTUS clearly prevents the Kamala switch.

I never said any laws or rules were broken when the DNC swapped in Kamala, so why are you asking me to tell you what laws or rules were broken? That's insanity.

Exactly. But it seems to be all he can ever offer.
Years later, he demands we accept that bones do not have nerves in them BECAUSE HE SAID SO.

ThxOne is the one who posted a DEFINTION of the term "sleepy" that absolutely says it has to do with sleep. He posted it to support the meaning of the moniker "sleepy Joe". Did he post the definition of "sleepy" in order to say the definition has nothing to do with the "sleepy Joe"?

That would be like me posting a definition of "hot" that describes temperature, and then saying "I meant the woman who is sexy and has a great body". WHY post the definition regarding temperature?

Or is this just to be expected from the guy who says "in" does not mean "in" per the dictionary definition?

I have no idea why Thx thinks there are no nerves in bones, but I've learned to accept it and don't feel it's necessary to bring it up in a weak attempt to bolster an unrelated argument. Clearly you've chosen to not accept our word that we weren't being literal with "Sleepy Joe." I've gone as far as providing Biden's biographer's opinion that "Sleepy Joe" was in regards to his incoherence and yet you still want to push this narrative that "Sleepy Joe" was a literal nickname. Now I've even gone as far as to switch out "Sleepy Joe" for a literal nickname for Biden, but you still can't let this go.

Why did Thx post the definition of Sleepy? To fawk with you. That's also why I responded to Thx's post "That clears things up;" I knew it did nothing to clear it up and ultimately there is nothing I could post that would clear this up. Elementary school kids understand that nicknames aren't always literal; why is that concept beyond your grasp? I assume you used Teflon Don at some point, but you don't believe Trump is actually coated in Teflon.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You just post on here to argue about the most meaningless crap. Thx thinks the bait and switch was unethical, is he not allowed to think bait & switch tactics are unethical? The fact that you even ask him to "prove" that bait and switch is immoral is astonishing.

True.

I didn't support Thx arguments regarding Kamala; specifically, I posted that I don't see where COTUS prevents the bait and switch, that the GOP could use a similar tactic and that I don't know if there is a FEC law forbidding the bait and switch. So why are you asking me to defend positions that I've never taken and even questioned??? You've lost touch with reality. I'm going to note that when I responded to Thx that I don't see where the COTUS prevents the bait & switch, he didn't respond with pages of "yes it does, where's your proof, etc." He just accepts that I don't think the COTUS clearly prevents the Kamala switch.

Also... true.

I never said any laws or rules were broken when the DNC swapped in Kamala, so why are you asking me to tell you what laws or rules were broken? That's insanity.

I made a statement that as long as he/them get the results they are looking for then the left is ok with pushing aside laws, ethics, morals and such. I am paraphrasing here.

I have no idea why Thx thinks there are no nerves in bones, but I've learned to accept it and don't feel it's necessary to bring it up in a weak attempt to bolster an unrelated argument. Clearly you've chosen to not accept our word that we weren't being literal with "Sleepy Joe." I've gone as far as providing Biden's biographer's opinion that "Sleepy Joe" was in regards to his incoherence and yet you still want to push this narrative that "Sleepy Joe" was a literal nickname. Now I've even gone as far as to switch out "Sleepy Joe" for a literal nickname for Biden, but you still can't let this go.

Within compact bone there are no nerves. It's likened to a fossilized tree branch where there is no water in the branch. There is a thin layer around that bone that contains nerves for sure. There are hollows in the compact bone that have nerves as well... this being where the marrow is and the like.

Why did Thx post the definition of Sleepy? To fawk with you. That's also why I responded to Thx's post "That clears things up;" I knew it did nothing to clear it up and ultimately there is nothing I could post that would clear this up. Elementary school kids understand that nicknames aren't always literal; why is that concept beyond your grasp? I assume you used Teflon Don at some point, but you don't believe Trump is actually coated in Teflon.

I literally asked Rob to tell me how or what "sleepy sleep" is. I got no answer.

 

[Jimi77 5,000+ posts]

This is what I hate about California: Everything California eventually ends up Californicating Colorado.

Protesters in Aurora rally against ICE amid growing tensions across the U.S.

Demonstrators in Aurora marched from Parklane Park to the ICE detention facility Monday, demanding an end to detentions and deportations.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Jimi77 5,000+ posts]

It's autocracy when Trump enforces laws and prevents rioting and violence.

Contributor: Why I'm going to a 'No Kings' rally against Trump, and you should too

It'll do you good. It'll do our democracy good. This Saturday is our chance.

www.latimes.com

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So, you can;t supoort your own claims.
Again.

What does supoort mean? Do you mean to say I can't supoort your allegations? That would be moore correct.

Your TSS requires that you fail to provide evidence.
"Because ThxOne SAYS so" is not evidence

It is if what I say are facts.

Yet another bad job at deflecting.
It deflecting, backpedaling, tapdancing away from the facts, all you are capable of?

******? Used for? Ever seen one?

You insist that you are correct, and have demanded many times that I answer your inane and irrelevant questions.
You demand that your beliefs and opinions be demanded as facts, without being questioned.

If I insist then it is because I am correct. However, I am not running around insisting or demanding anything. You often claim I say things I do not say then demand I defend it.

YOU posted the very definition of the word. It's an adjective that describes sleep.
Then you denied that it's an adjective that describes sleep.
Did you forget that? Were you drunk or on shrooms when you did so? Did the frog in your pocket post it? Was it your babysitter and not you, perhaps?

If you don't like the definition proving you wrong, then why post it?

hot - Slang.

1. sexually aroused; lustful.
2. sexy; attractive.
   
   

   Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words

   The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!

   www.dictionary.com

So it is still the word "HOT"? The way you explained it was that there was another word hot with a different meaning. Thanks for showing that it is still the same word. Weird though that it can be used in a different context or to describe something that has nothing to do with temperature. Just baffling.

1. 
   

"Comprehend".
Tell us more about your inability to comprehend literally dozens of things discussed here.
Explain to us how "in your wheelhouse" regarding someone's capabilities, describes a boat.

From your buddies at Oxford:

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
wheel·house


/ˈ(h)wēlˌhous/


noun
noun: wheelhouse; plural noun: wheelhouses

1. 1.
   a part of a boat or ship serving as a shelter for the person at the wheel.

Tell us how "in" doesn't mean "in" when it comes to medical science.

The same way hot doesn't always mean hot. You know like..... "IN LOVE"

Tell us all about how "ironic" is not used to describe something that is the opposite of what is expected.

That is EXACTLY what it is used to describe and you have used it that way like... one time.

Tell us how "mono" means more than one.

This is a mono leaf spring. It uses 7 leaves to make one mono spring.

Tell us how the CFR is just "some ********" that is not relevant to the law.

Doesn't mean **** to me... it is literally just a bunch of rules and rules ain't law.

Tell us how the FEC decides a person must be selected as a POTUS candidate by their party in the spring.

I never, not one time, said it did. I said it is one of the step taken to become a Presidential nominee.

Tell us how Kentucky gas prices do not change as the national average goes up or down.

Here you go again. Your emotions are getting the best of you. I never made this claim. liar.

Tell us how averages are only used for lazy or nefarious purposes.

I never made that claim either liar. Tell us why you are trying to camouflage the first word in that sentence you child.

Tell us how a rest stop is not allowed to have gasoline sold for automotive use.

Never made that claim either liar. I said if it sold gas it would be a gas station.

Tell us how oil drilling permits get issued without a land lease in place.

You tell me how the left gets away with that ****.

Tell us how gas prices rose due to panic -buying of toilet paper, months before the panic occurred.

Again, I never made that claim. Liar.

Tell us how a salaried worker's pay changes based on their weekly production.

Never made that claim. Liar.

Tell us how real pricing doesn't matter when it comes to a person's expenses over time.

Tell use why you have to soften inflation by coming up with irrelevant terms.

And that's the tip of the iceberg of **** you can't begin to comprehend.

Why would anyone comprehend your lies Rob? That is just ignorant.