You spent all that time typing all those posts, when you could have just said "I don't understand the math".The point was that overall Democrats have added more. I am aware of the rest and never disputed it. RobGMN however has to argue no matter what.
Yes, I would reelect him. Democrats keep electing their party even though they also have amassed a great debt to this country, a greater debt. It's a no win situation.
One more thing... The Debt being higher if Republicans were in the White house more is just an assumption. It takes more money to undo the Democrats screw ups.
OK, cool.It's not just Rob, the DNC & libs in general seem unwilling to change or moderate their positions.
Considering you have claimed that Obama deported people illegally, and that Clinton's budget cuts were illegal, but have been unable to prove (with multiple requests from me) any laws were broken in either case, I would say yes.LOL - now you expect me to believe the left is the law and order party.![]()
The Reublicans added $125 per person to the debt.Republican #1 adds $100 to the debt
Democrat #1 adds $75
Democrat #2 adds $80
Democrat #3 adds $70
Democrat #4 adds $90
Democrat #5 adds $85
Republican #2 adds $150
By Robs logic the Republicans have added more to the debt. You know, because $250 is MORE than $400. Idiot.
Your little math game will not change facts. Democrats have added to the National Debt more than Republicans. It's the same bank account, who has spent the most? Democrats. I don't even care that you refuse to accepts facts anymore. Just shows how delusional you are and how willing you are to come up with endless bullshit to somehow trick people into seeing things the liberal way.You spent all that time typing all those posts, when you could have just said "I don't understand the math".
Answer these questions, and we will have a better understanding or your abilities:
Over the course of the year , you buy 90 apples for $54 total. Your wife buys 50 apples for $32.50 total. Whose purchases ended up being better for the houeshold expenses?
Team A plays 225 games a year and wins 180. Team B plays 175 games a year and wins 155 games. Which team is better?
Gambling Dan bets $2,000 on a boxing match, and wins $750. Gambling Denise bets $15,000 on a boxing match, and wins $4,125. Who had the btter win?
If the Republicans are all about debt and spending reduction, why do they spend more per term than the Democrats?If, hypothetically, Dem deficit spending is a result of just spending more time in power, then why have they never used that time in power to reduce spending as Trump currently is attempting to do? Personally, I'm more concerned about the present and at the present the left is highly committed to keeping spending as high as possible regardless of what ridiculous programs, practices and policies DOGE uncovers. They'll use the courts to muck everything up and when these issues go before the legislature, we know the Dems will do everything to grind the system to a halt.
I answered that already. Because it cost a lot more to fix democrats **** ups.If the Republicans are all about debt and spending reduction, why do they spend more per term than the Democrats?
Seems like the same logic as the subsidized farmers being anti-welfare.
It was YOUR example, kid. I just expanded it.Your little math game will not change facts. Democrats have added to the National Debt more than Republicans. It's the same bank account, who has spent the most? Democrats. I don't even care that you refuse to accepts facts anymore. Just shows how delusional you are and how willing you are to come up with endless bullshit to somehow trick people into seeing things the liberal way.
"**** ups" like having a better economy than the Republicans for 75 years?I answered that already. Because it cost a lot more to fix democrats **** ups.
I know you can't read and your brain is stuck in "******* off the left" mode but I never disputed that. I know these facts, have known these facts... probably before you had to Google them. Still, the fact remains... Overall, Democrats have added more to the national debt than Republicans. It's killin you isn't it? Not being able to dispute facts.It was YOUR example, kid. I just expanded it.
And your own example burned you and proved you wrong. Again.
Don't complain when you try to use math that you don't understand, and it once again backfires on you.
Here's a FACT: Per term since 1913, Republicans outspend Democrats. It's history, and it will not change.
'Sucks when the facts don't land where you want them to, huh?
So the Republicans are worse for the debt AND worse for the economy.I know you can't read and your brain is stuck in "******* off the left" mode but I never disputed that. I know these facts, have known these facts... probably before you had to Google them. Still, the fact remains... Overall, Democrats have added more to the national debt than Republicans. It's killin you isn't it? Not being able to dispute facts.
So the Democrats add more to the debt overall and you claim Republicans are worse for the economy.So the Republicans are worse for the debt AND worse for the economy.
Got it.