Current events discussion

The point was that overall Democrats have added more. I am aware of the rest and never disputed it. RobGMN however has to argue no matter what.

Yes, I would reelect him. Democrats keep electing their party even though they also have amassed a great debt to this country, a greater debt. It's a no win situation.

One more thing... The Debt being higher if Republicans were in the White house more is just an assumption. It takes more money to undo the Democrats screw ups.
You spent all that time typing all those posts, when you could have just said "I don't understand the math".

Answer these questions, and we will have a better understanding or your abilities:
Over the course of the year , you buy 90 apples for $54 total. Your wife buys 50 apples for $32.50 total. Whose purchases ended up being better for the houeshold expenses?

Team A plays 225 games a year and wins 180. Team B plays 175 games a year and wins 155 games. Which team is better?

Gambling Dan bets $2,000 on a boxing match, and wins $750. Gambling Denise bets $15,000 on a boxing match, and wins $4,125. Who had the btter win?
 
It's not just Rob, the DNC & libs in general seem unwilling to change or moderate their positions.
OK, cool.
Help Thxone prove his belief that the Republicans are better for debt control than the Republicans.

I've asked him several times to prove it mathematically, and he simply cannot.
Prove it to me mathematically so I can change or moderate my position.

I like math becasue it has nothing to do with feelings, beliefs, opinions, or "trust me bro" bullshit.
 
LOL - now you expect me to believe the left is the law and order party. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Considering you have claimed that Obama deported people illegally, and that Clinton's budget cuts were illegal, but have been unable to prove (with multiple requests from me) any laws were broken in either case, I would say yes.

The GOP actually claims they are the "law and order" party, yet they elect a ******, felon, ****** predator, thief, as POTUS, and he essentially tells a judge to "**** off" when the judge makes a decision.
A POTUS who is saying that people should not have their legally protected day in court, because it's not worth the court system's time.
A POTUS who has violated the COTUS more times in his last term, than all other presidents combined.
A POTUS who has lost about 93% of court cases he has been involved in (how DARE anyone take Dear Leader to court for ANYTHING!).
A POTUS who literally steal from a charity.

Need more?
 
Republican #1 adds $100 to the debt
Democrat #1 adds $75
Democrat #2 adds $80
Democrat #3 adds $70
Democrat #4 adds $90
Democrat #5 adds $85
Republican #2 adds $150


By Robs logic the Republicans have added more to the debt. You know, because $250 is MORE than $400. Idiot.
The Reublicans added $125 per person to the debt.
The Democrats added $80 per person to the debt.

So the Republicans are better for the debt because they lost the election more often, even though they outspend the Democrats by $45 per person?
If that was 5 and 5, the Republicans would have spent $625, and the Democrats would have spent $400
In government debt numbers that could be $22.5 TRILLION more that the Republicans spent.

Great example to show again you are wrong.
 
Last edited:
You spent all that time typing all those posts, when you could have just said "I don't understand the math".

Answer these questions, and we will have a better understanding or your abilities:
Over the course of the year , you buy 90 apples for $54 total. Your wife buys 50 apples for $32.50 total. Whose purchases ended up being better for the houeshold expenses?

Team A plays 225 games a year and wins 180. Team B plays 175 games a year and wins 155 games. Which team is better?

Gambling Dan bets $2,000 on a boxing match, and wins $750. Gambling Denise bets $15,000 on a boxing match, and wins $4,125. Who had the btter win?
Your little math game will not change facts. Democrats have added to the National Debt more than Republicans. It's the same bank account, who has spent the most? Democrats. I don't even care that you refuse to accepts facts anymore. Just shows how delusional you are and how willing you are to come up with endless bullshit to somehow trick people into seeing things the liberal way.
 
If, hypothetically, Dem deficit spending is a result of just spending more time in power, then why have they never used that time in power to reduce spending as Trump currently is attempting to do? Personally, I'm more concerned about the present and at the present the left is highly committed to keeping spending as high as possible regardless of what ridiculous programs, practices and policies DOGE uncovers. They'll use the courts to muck everything up and when these issues go before the legislature, we know the Dems will do everything to grind the system to a halt.
If the Republicans are all about debt and spending reduction, why do they spend more per term than the Democrats?
Seems like the same logic as the subsidized farmers being anti-welfare.
 
Your little math game will not change facts. Democrats have added to the National Debt more than Republicans. It's the same bank account, who has spent the most? Democrats. I don't even care that you refuse to accepts facts anymore. Just shows how delusional you are and how willing you are to come up with endless bullshit to somehow trick people into seeing things the liberal way.
It was YOUR example, kid. I just expanded it.
And your own example burned you and proved you wrong. Again.

Don't complain when you try to use math that you don't understand, and it once again backfires on you.

Here's a FACT: Per term since 1913, Republicans outspend Democrats. It's history, and it will not change.
'Sucks when the facts don't land where you want them to, huh?

1746402472695.png
 
Last edited:
I answered that already. Because it cost a lot more to fix democrats **** ups.
"**** ups" like having a better economy than the Republicans for 75 years?
Explain all these "**** ups" that the Republican s"pay for" by increasing the national debt more than the Democrats do.
Give us a list.
 
It was YOUR example, kid. I just expanded it.
And your own example burned you and proved you wrong. Again.

Don't complain when you try to use math that you don't understand, and it once again backfires on you.

Here's a FACT: Per term since 1913, Republicans outspend Democrats. It's history, and it will not change.
'Sucks when the facts don't land where you want them to, huh?
I know you can't read and your brain is stuck in "******* off the left" mode but I never disputed that. I know these facts, have known these facts... probably before you had to Google them. Still, the fact remains... Overall, Democrats have added more to the national debt than Republicans. It's killin you isn't it? Not being able to dispute facts.
 
I know you can't read and your brain is stuck in "******* off the left" mode but I never disputed that. I know these facts, have known these facts... probably before you had to Google them. Still, the fact remains... Overall, Democrats have added more to the national debt than Republicans. It's killin you isn't it? Not being able to dispute facts.
So the Republicans are worse for the debt AND worse for the economy.
And you don't dispute it.
Got it.
 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,958
Views
512,143
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top