Ahhhh, the repetition-to-make-truth game.More Democrats caused more debt. Sorry.
See there you go again and for the 3rd time I have to tell your ignorant ***. I never said PER TERM, I said OVERALL.Ahhhh, the repetition-to-make-truth game.
Prove it. Show us all how the Democrats incurred more debt per term than the Republicans.
Use 1913 as your base year.
Disprove all the economists.
Disprove the math.
Remember: "because I said so" is not a proof.
Repeating a lie is not a proof.
Calling mathematics bullshit is not a proof.
OVERALL is an irrelevant metric.See there you go again and for the 3rd time I have to tell your ignorant ***. I never said PER TERM, I said OVERALL.
Are you kidding me!!!!! Overall is a pretty big ******* number and you say it is irrelevant!!! You really are a clown aren't you. You will argue anything and never admit anyone else is right. Instead you would rather say some of the dumbest shit I have heard just to avoid saying - You are right.OVERALL is an irrelevant metric.
It's as dumb as "99.9% of bathtub accidents occur in the home". No shit.
Might as well say "My amp goes to ELEVEN".
Would you rather have 10 salespeople move $10M worth of product, or 15 salespeople move $12.5 million worth?
The 15 becasue they sold MORE. Right?
Nope. That would be asinine.
As asinine as saying the Dmeocrats are worse for the debt because they incurred more debt WITH MORE YEARS IN OFFICE.
Effing moronic.
We are talking about finances, mathematics, economics, statistics.Are you kidding me!!!!! Overall is a pretty big ******* number and you say it is irrelevant!!! You really are a clown aren't you. You will argue anything and never admit anyone else is right. Instead you would rather say some of the dumbest shit I have heard just to avoid saying - You are right.
Stick to masturbating to NatGeo cause you are no master debater.
So you're concerned about the lack of savings, but not concerned about all the lawsuits to hang onto every last dime of spending, every single job, every department, which basically doubles our losses. Anything but bring jobs back to the US. Anything but cut spending. Maybe if a dem wins on 2028, they'll make spending cuts and the left can get behind them. Anybody remember how thrilled the dems were when Clinton went budget slashing? Remember how the dems turned a blond eye to Obama's kids in cages and record setting deportations?They estimate $323 Billion in tax revenue alone will be lost over a decade (I may have mistakenly sai d "year" at some point).
So it costs $135 Billion to save $25 Billion (18 cents save for every dollar spent), that will cost another $300 Billion over the first decade?
We're worried about wasteful spending, but Trump wants to throw himself an almost $100 Million birthday parade, while funding for things like cancer research gets slashed?
Which lawsuits are you referencing?
I am just happy Rob is wrong and is sticking to being wrong.They've cooperated to create this massive debt bubble. The dems create the massive spending programs; the GOP doesn't hesitate to keep funding those progams.
The lawsuits are to prevent Trump, Musk, and DOGE from doing things ILLEGALLY.So you're concerned about the lack of savings, but not concerned about all the lawsuits to hang onto every last dime of spending, every single job, every department, which basically doubles our losses. Anything but bring jobs back to the US. Anything but cut spending. Maybe if a dem wins on 2028, they'll make spending cuts and the left can get behind them. Anybody remember how thrilled the dems were when Clinton went budget slashing? Remember how the dems turned a blond eye to Obama's kids in cages and record setting deportations?![]()
Please show me where I am wrong when I say that the Republicans added more to the national debt per term than the Democrats id.I am just happy Rob is wrong and is sticking to being wrong.