You're clearly demonstrating your lack of understanding of our judicial system.
I am calling him a ****** because the justice stem defines him as a ******. I have shared the legal documents to prove as much.
IF you want to deny he is a ******, your argument is with the judge, the jury, the legal system, not me. Not any more than if you wanted to argue that 2+2 does not equal 4, when I say it does.
The court decision says he is a ******.
Unless you can prove that decision was rescinded or overturned on appeal, it does not change, nor will I stop calling him a ******.
"And since the jury's answer to Question 1 demonstrates that it was unconvinced that there was penile penetration, the only remaining conclusion is that it found that Mr. Trump forcibly penetrated her ****** with his fingers – in other words, that he “*****” her in the sense of that term broader than the New York Penal Law definition."
So once again to be VERY clear: Your argument is with the court hearing decision, with the judge, with the jury, with the legal system.
Until you can prove otherwise, Trump is a ******.