Can RobGMN or stocker08 explain how a DEI hire with little to no skills is the right choice over a person who is actually highly qualified for a position?
You're skipping off on tangents without addressing the things asked of you.
Why do you always do that? inability to answer?
You never offered any rebuttal for all of the ethics and legal violations that Trump committed, other than "call the cops", which is decidedly not the "adult conversation" you demanded after getting your hand slapped by the mods for acting like a child.
You also said it was a lie that the url for Major General Charles C Rogers' webpage had been wiped, and replaced with a dei-modified url.
You said this despite the existence of the dei-modified url that now redirects to the original, plus evidence on the Wayback Machine that shows the original url was gone for a period of time.
Have you tried loading the modified url, or is this just another case of "because you said so", and you just demand we accept your claim as correct?
Can RobGMN or stocker08 explain how a DEI hire with little to no skills is the right choice over a person who is actually highly qualified for a position?
You are assuming that all people who got hired under a DEI initiative have little to no skills.
So, you think that every person who is not caucasian must have little to no skills.
Why do you think people of color by default have little to no skills?