Current events discussion

Feel free to screenshot the posts and prove this claim. Do it in your response so there is no confusion ever again whether you did it or not.
I don't think ANYONE should post anything you demand until you reciprocate.
Funny how both you and ThxOne consider two wires touching each other to be "bridged", even though you both offer a definition of "bridge" as a third item that connects the first two in some way.

Two wires touching each other are not "bridged".
YES IT IS!!
Damn, it IS liek you and ThxOne share a common pea-sized brain.
Show me a schematic of ANY mono amplifier circuit that shows multiple outputs off of the amplifier.
ONE.
I've asked Thx this a dozen times, but he simply can't do it.
I'll wait for yours.
Again, your denial does not mean we are wrong.
 
Trump is an upstanding President.

Hey Rob lol READ THIS YOU TWIT!

To "bridge" wires means to connect two wires together directly, essentially creating a single point of contact between them; this is usually done by stripping the ends of both wires, twisting the bare strands together, and then optionally securing the connection with solder, a wire nut, or heat shrink tubing, depending on the application and desired level of security
 
Trump will make the economy great again.

Hey Rob, Read this too!!!

"Internally bridged" means that within a device, typically an amplifier, two separate channels are electronically combined to act as a single, more powerful channel, effectively giving you the output power of both channels combined by internally wiring them in a "bridged" configuration; this allows you to drive a single speaker with significantly more power than using just one channel alone.
 
Trump will eventually find a way to get these damn egg prices down lol

Hey Rob... Read this. It's you!!!

When someone argues even when they are demonstrably wrong, it usually means they are being stubborn, obstinate, or contrarian; prioritizing the act of arguing and defending their position over acknowledging the truth, often due to ego, pride, or a strong need to be right regardless of the facts.



Key points about this behavior:
  • Ego-driven:
    The person might feel their self-worth is tied to "winning" the argument, even if it means distorting facts or logic.
  • Denial mechanism:
    Sometimes, people may be unconsciously denying evidence that contradicts their beliefs, making it difficult to admit they are wrong.

  • Contrarian attitude:
    Some people simply enjoy taking the opposing view, even when it's not well-supported, just to challenge the status quo
 
Hey... Robbie?
 

Attachments

  • 469419873_458460830612751_6601065746316188383_n.jpg
    469419873_458460830612751_6601065746316188383_n.jpg
    42.3 KB · Views: 6
Elon is not a member of the Administrative Branch.
Trump has no clue what Elon and team are doing, and I think we both know that. Hell, his team doesn't seem to know what they are doing. (cough) COBOL (cough)

He doesn't have motivation? TESLA
Not to mention billions in government contracts.
Actually I'm pretty sure Trump does know what Elon is doing. And Tesla stock is suffering with Elon heading DOGE. Clearly Elon is a member of the Administrative Branch doing administrative stuff. This may be your wrongest post yet.
 
Compelling, and rich. Really adding a lot to the conversation, huh?
You know, that thing that you always whine like a little snowflake Karen about?

But yeah, it's a lot easier to be a little snowflake Karen than pony up up prove the verbal diarrhea you spew here.
It's funny how snowflake Karens claim they have mono amps with multiple outputs, yet can't seem to show a SINGLE schematic of a mono amp with multiple outputs.

It's funny how snowflake Karens claim their extensive study of anatomy across 20 pages in a textbook told then that bones do not have nerves in them, yet they can't provide a SINGLE quote or ANY other proof regarding it.

It's funny how little snowflake Karens use words incorrectly because their English skills are less than that of a 6th grader, but it's everyone ELSE'S fault for not knowing the little snowflake Karen made up their own definitions that match NO OTHER definition for a word.

It's funny how little snowflake Karens accuse others of living with their dead parents or grandparents, yet it's the little snowflake Karens who actually had to move back in with mommy and daddy after the last relative who would house them got sick of their shit and kicked them out.

Little snowflake Karens sure are funny.
 
Trump is an upstanding President.

Hey Rob lol READ THIS YOU TWIT!

To "bridge" wires means to connect two wires together directly, essentially creating a single point of contact between them; this is usually done by stripping the ends of both wires, twisting the bare strands together, and then optionally securing the connection with solder, a wire nut, or heat shrink tubing, depending on the application and desired level of security
No, it doesn't.

"A bridge circuit is a topology of electrical circuitry in which two circuit branches (usually in parallel with each other) are "bridged" by a third branch connected between the first two branches at some intermediate point along them."
THIRD BRANCH CONNECTED BETWEEN THE FIRST TWO
Two wires connected by touching each other are not "bridged", as there is no "third branch". They are CONNECTED.
Do you think your battery your battery cable terminal clamp are "bridged" when the clamp is on the post? NOPE. They are CONNECTED.
The cable and the battery terminal post are "bridged" by the terminal clamp.
The clamp is the THIRD BRANCH CONNECTED BETWEEN THE FISRT TWO.

Man, I thought a person would actually have to put effort into demonstrating so little knowledge, but you make it look easy.
 
Actually I'm pretty sure Trump does know what Elon is doing. And Tesla stock is suffering with Elon heading DOGE. Clearly Elon is a member of the Administrative Branch doing administrative stuff. This may be your wrongest post yet.
DOGE didn't even understand they were working on a system running on COBOL, but you think Trump has his finger on the pulse of what they are doing?

For **** sake, he is stealing money that was legally appropriated by Congress, in violation of the Constitution and the Impoundment Act of 1974.
Either he doesn't know the law, or he knows it and is breaking it with intent.

Which is it?
 
Trump will eventually find a way to get these damn egg prices down lol

Hey Rob... Read this. It's you!!!

When someone argues even when they are demonstrably wrong, it usually means they are being stubborn, obstinate, or contrarian; prioritizing the act of arguing and defending their position over acknowledging the truth, often due to ego, pride, or a strong need to be right regardless of the facts.
In other words, a guy who has refused to admit for THREE YEARS now that he screwed up in claiming bones do not have nerves in them. A claim he has never ONCE made an effort to prove.

Key points about this behavior:
  • Ego-driven:
    The person might feel their self-worth is tied to "winning" the argument, even if it means distorting facts or logic.
Like when you lie and say you provided proof to back up your claims, but never have.
You will make up your own proofs in the form of collateral claims that are unverifiable (i.e. the "THREE" doctors you spoke to, who confirmed your claim of "bones do not have nerves in them" for you).
Like when you lie and say all of medical science uses the word "in" incorrectly when saying there are nerves IN bone, but they only do it for the unwashed masses who are not as smart as you. The guy who went to school to learn to take dirt samples.
The guy who says a subwoofer is not "in" his car, but is merely "passing through" because it is not "attached".
  • Denial mechanism:
    Sometimes, people may be unconsciously denying evidence that contradicts their beliefs, making it difficult to admit they are wrong.
You have been proved wrong dozens of times, but are still fighting and denying EVERY single one of them.
Keep it simple: PROVE your old claim that bones do not have nerves in them.
  • Contrarian attitude:
    Some people simply enjoy taking the opposing view, even when it's not well-supported, just to challenge the status quo
Like claiming that bones do not have nerves in them? Or that "subsonic" means something other than "less than the speed of sound"? Or that ****** identity IS determined by the *** organs, yet not being able to tell us the ****** identity of the >500,000 people in the US alone, that are born intersex?

This would all be interesting if you had been able to prove me wrong just ONCE.

****, I'm STILL waiting for your proof that bones do not have nerves in them.
STILL waiting for you to prove with a schematic that your mono Rockford amp has multiple outputs.
STILL waiting for you to prove your claim that ****** identity is determined by the *** organs.
STILL waiting for you to prove your claim that vaccinating more than 99% but less than 100% of a population is not possible.
STILL waiting for you to prove your claim that Trump built 571 MILES of wall.
STILL waiting for you to prove your claim that Biden caused insulin prices to go up.
STILL waiting for you to prove your claim that orgasm exists to stimulate ovulation in women.
STILL waiting for your claim that Biden broke the law when he sold oil from the SPR.
STILL waiting for you to prove that just ONE lie in the database of Trump lies was actually a truth.
STILL waiting for you to prove your claim that people in low wage jobs do not want to get paid more than they already do.
STILL waiting for you to prove your claims that I have lied, made stuff up, altered quotes or screenshots of your words.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg with your bullshit claims that you cannot prove.
Funny how that works, huh?


If tires don't determine the speed of a car, why does removing them reduce the speed to zero?
(A response to the picket sign that shows the guy holding it has an IQ in the double digits. Was that you?).
 
Last edited:
So we're going to illegally sell citizenship to people? Cool!

1740543793158.png


18 U.S.C. § 1427 says, “Whoever unlawfully sells or disposes of a declaration of intention to become a citizen, certificate of naturalization or citizenship, or copies of other documentary evidence of naturalization or citizenship, will be fined under this title or imprisoned for up to 25 years if committed to facilitating an act of international terrorism, as defined in section 2331, 20 years if committed to facilitating a drug trafficking crime, as defined in section 929(a), ten years for the first or second such offense, or 15 years in the case of any other offense.”
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,962
Views
527,630
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
Curves.jpg

ThxOne

    May 25, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top