Can you rephrase that so it has relevance to the fact that I save the taxpayer 6-7x more than it costs to employ me?
Try again? I PROVE they stole it. The judges are already employed to handle appeals by clients who are not happy with changes made to their case. Appeals outnumber my prosecutions by 116:1.
All costs are already factored into the rate of return I provide.
You're not even trying, so I can't say "try again".
Huh? The Republicans claim that all welfare recipients are Democrats. Now you want to say they are all Republicans, and that is why I investigate and prosecute them?
As usual, you can't even keep up with your own bullshit.
You consistently fail.
Sorry, but being good at failing doesn't mean you are a success.
You're not even bright enough to know that DOGE has no power whatsoever over my employment.
In fact, I would LOVE for Musk and his entire team to descend on my office, and tell me that I can take a payout or be fired. It would not end well for any of them.
The people who dislike authority the most, are msot often the ones breaking the rules.
You seem to REALLY hate that I investigate and prosecute welfare fraud. That lands you in range of people likely to be committing welfare fraud.
So you paid income taxes when you weren't working, and you paid the full taxes on all the cash tips you got when delivering pizzas?
That doesn't answer the question. Did you post lies or truths?
You asked for proof. Did you forget that quickly?
follower - an adherent or devotee of a particular person, cause, or activity
supporter - a person who approves of and encourages someone or something (typically a public figure, a movement or party, or a policy).
Failing to answer the question. As always.
I post here regularly. I offer ideas to the mods to increase traffic. I post helpful info in threads where I can offer it. I purchase from advertisers.
And?
Here you go:
https://www.caraudio.com/threads/trump-being-trump.614388/
Why would I leave? I'm not the one constantly whining that I'm reading and posting in a thread named "Trump being Trump". That's YOU.
Fine. You think Google is the be-all/end-all to an argument.
Let's start from the beginning: Use Google to show me proof that bones do not have nerves in them.
Once you've done that, we'll chronologically move to your next false claim. You can just type "Google" in your PC, and it will give you all the answers.
Yes. Your "extensive" study in anatomy, where you learned that bones do not have nerves in them.
Because all dirt sample takers are trained extensively in anatomy. A course that you MIGHT have to take ONE of to get a degree.
With "extensive" study in anatomy, where they taught you that bones do not have nerves in them?
While your field of study was microorganisms?
Got any other possibilities?