Current events discussion

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Buffoonery? To ask someone to walk the walk if they want to talk the talk?
I just think that's being a realistic adult.


It's been 12 hours and it's a weekend.
Do you think there might be some repercussions on Monday morning? On Facebook, a whole lot of people are calling for him to be fired.

You think asking somebody to dox themselves is being a realistic adult??? Whatever floats your boat.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Our own money funding our own fall

Soros-funded Dems suddenly upset by billionaires in government

USAID isn’t representing the United States around the world. It is representing a narrow and now very dated view around the world.

nypost.com

Pure insanity. Ultimately it's not the billionaires that bother them, it's the wrong billionaires.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Meanwhile Trump is adding trillions to the national debt. Republican's don't care about that. USAID was around Trump's first four years and he did nothing. Why not? People gave Kamala sh*t for not doing anything during her fours years as VP. Why didn't Trump do anything during his first four years? There are one million millions in a trillion. Keep crying about millions.

He's doing something now and the liberals are in tears. And rather than saying "Puck this grift, shut this down and lets find more of this and shut it down" the left justifies it by saying it survived Trump's first term, Melania supported an USAID event, Elon wasn't elected, etc, etc, etc. Just shows us where the priorities lie. Welcome back Bobby.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No, I actually showed exactly where you took the words from, and provided a link to the Mayo website that had them.

You did not actually.

Say's the guy with HUNDREDS of posts screaming ********** ad hominem when he gets proved wrong.

You keep bringing it up as if you miss it. Or you just think you are smart by saying ad hominem when you aren't even Latin. If anyone is actually using ad hominems it's you everytime you argue against anyone. You know when we "paint ourselves in a corner" or "listen to every lie that Trump says".

It's obviously complaining, don't try more of your stupid backpedal-spin attempts to change the meaning of what you say. No one (well, ALMOST no one) here is stupid enough to believe it.

You are the person who is complaining the most on this entire site Rob. Trying to convince me that when I am having a conversation that I am complaining because you don't like it. You are in opposition to everyone here and you are negative about everything we post... you are the definition of complaining.

noun
noun: complaining

1. the expression of dissatisfaction or annoyance about something.
   "his complaining has been a little bit annoying"
   

adjective
adjective: complaining

1. expressing dissatisfaction or annoyance about something.
   "she apologized to the complaining crowd"

Thank you, Captain Obvious.
I hope you didn't really think that anybody was wondering if the forum employed people to prove their claims to me.
Did you?

I hope like hell my sarcasm is obvious.

Libelous AND slanderous. And if Trump gets his way and eliminates Section 230, the owners of this website could be held liable for your actions.
You pose a danger to the continued operation of the site. You may want to knock that shit off.

Oh I am sorry, are you saying you never said...

"I was a *********"
-RobGMN

I am going to teach you a lesson here. You did indeed say these exact words and in this exact order together. What I am doing here is exactly what you do when you quote me. I will grab words you have indeed typed on this forum but I will do the far left democrat "RobGMN" thing and leave out the context. When other people read a quote that you have indeed typed on this forum how do you think their opinion of you will go?

So by acknowledging this quote as "Libelous AND slanderous" and telling me that if Trump gets his way... there is his name you can't stop saying, that the site owners can be held liable for MY actions. I pose a danger and I may want to knock it off huh? Nah, nothing I have said here is untrue. Dig this, I can BACK IT UP with facts as well as proof. Wanna see it? Now if you would like me to remove the quote you said you can do the same and remove the quotes you have posted of me out of context. You know, the one's that if Trump gets his way can make the site owners liable for YOUR actions.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Welcome back Bobby.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You think asking somebody to dox themselves is being a realistic adult??? Whatever floats your boat.

So you are worried about even your name being posted here amongst a dozen or so active participants, but have no problem with a man (and his goon squad) who was not hired, not appointed, not contracted, not vetted, not granted proper clearance, to have access to HOW many million Americans' personal info, trillions of dollars in funding control, access to government contract data (when his company has its own contracts that can now be monkeyed with)?

So as long as it's not YOUR info, it's OK? Interesting.

You said it yourself that our COTUS is evolving, and that the right to privacy is basically going away under the conservative SCOTUS.
You sure seem to be OK with it, so walk the walk. Post your name here.

No, I'm not really expecting you to. I know it's a LOT easier to talk the talk, and that you would be too concerned that a nutter here would use it against you in some way. But think about that. You are afraid to put your name here, but are OK with Musk walking in and assuming command.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You did not actually.

For the third time:

You keep bringing it up as if you miss it. Or you just think you are smart by saying ad hominem when you aren't even Latin. If anyone is actually using ad hominems it's you everytime you argue against anyone. You know when we "paint ourselves in a corner" or "listen to every lie that Trump says".

Back to school for you. As usual.

Ad Hominem - (Attacking the person): This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.​

I post facts that prove you wrong, then you hurl ********** epithets, simple pejoratives, threats of violence, suggestions of *******.
A clear example that even you could understand:

You are the person who is complaining the most on this entire site Rob. Trying to convince me that when I am having a conversation that I am complaining because you don't like it. You are in opposition to everyone here and you are negative about everything we post... you are the definition of complaining.

noun
noun: complaining

1. the expression of dissatisfaction or annoyance about something.
   "his complaining has been a little bit annoying"

adjective
adjective: complaining

1. expressing dissatisfaction or annoyance about something.
   "she apologized to the complaining crowd"

I hope like hell my sarcasm is obvious.

Oh I am sorry, are you saying you never said...

"I was a *********"
-RobGMN

There you go again, posting info that proves you're wrong. You complain all the time. You even complain that you are participating in this thread, that NO ONE is forcing you to be in.
Feel free to be happy, and leave.

Keep posting that. Let's see how the moderators like it.

I am going to teach you a lesson here. You did indeed say these exact words and in this exact order together. What I am doing here is exactly what you do when you quote me. I will grab words you have indeed typed on this forum but I will do the far left democrat "RobGMN" thing and leave out the context. When other people read a quote that you have indeed typed on this forum how do you think their opinion of you will go?

Let's see it.

So by acknowledging this quote as "Libelous AND slanderous" and telling me that if Trump gets his way... there is his name you can't stop saying, that the site owners can be held liable for MY actions. I pose a danger and I may want to knock it off huh? Nah, nothing I have said here is untrue. Dig this, I can BACK IT UP with facts as well as proof. Wanna see it? Now if you would like me to remove the quote you said you can do the same and remove the quotes you have posted of me out of context. You know, the one's that if Trump gets his way can make the site owners liable for YOUR actions.

You post stuff that is libelous AND slanderous. And yes, if Trump gets his way with a rollback of Section 230, the site owners can be held liable for what others post here.
You seem very willing to take risks with their money. You think $3/month gives you that right?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

He needs to win so he can pay for the ****** assault. Am I wrong? He owes her over $80 million.

Welcome back.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

So you are worried about even your name being posted here amongst a dozen or so active participants, but have no problem with a man (and his goon squad) who was not hired, not appointed, not contracted, not vetted, not granted proper clearance, to have access to HOW many million Americans' personal info, trillions of dollars in funding control, access to government contract data (when his company has its own contracts that can now be monkeyed with)?

So as long as it's not YOUR info, it's OK? Interesting.

You said it yourself that our COTUS is evolving, and that the right to privacy is basically going away under the conservative SCOTUS.
You sure seem to be OK with it, so walk the walk. Post your name here.

No, I'm not really expecting you to. I know it's a LOT easier to talk the talk, and that you would be too concerned that a nutter here would use it against you in some way. But think about that. You are afraid to put your name here, but are OK with Musk walking in and assuming command.

You do know there are people at Dept of Ag, Treasury Dept, IRS, etc that have access to the info already? Hell, google already has all my info anyway. Ever do any research on intrawebz marketing; they have 300 points of data on "everybody." Hell Elon already has the info he wants on us and if he doesn't he can buy it for cheap. How do you know these guys aren't vetted? Trump said Elon was a Special Gov't Employee and I'm pretty sure when you're Elon Musk "they" already have him vetted.

But I get it, TDS above everything else and since USAID was funding Politico and the BBC, they're the good guys in your eyes. Who cares that gov't agencies are fawking the American taxpayers as long as the conservative taxpayers get fawked a little harder.