Current events discussion

Questions would not get repeated if they would just be answered.
Why is it people are so afraid to answer a question that would simply prove me wrong. Prove me wrong, and the question goes away.
Yet you can't back up the 30k claim without using the wapo database and wapo canceling the Biden tracking 100 days shows their bias...if the 30k claim is true you should be able to support it with an unbiased source...
 
Annnnd, you are 100% incorrect. I'd say nice try, but creating a fantasy in your head is not a "try".

So, have you found evidence of people getting jabbed with the COVID vax against their will yet?
Hoe about those people they pinned down and put masks on?
Already provided you the definition of "forced." Only someone gaslighting would think other than the true definition.


Speaking of gaslighting, I NEVER made a claim directly, indirectly, or even by suggesting or inference, that a human ***** is not a human *****.
I NEVER made a claim directly, indirectly, or even by suggesting or inference, that abortion is not killing a human zygote, or blastocyte, embryo, or *****.

So either stop gaslighting the other members here with the idea that I did so, or provide the proof that I did.
(Save yourself the time. It never happened).
Are you ready to apologize?
Here's your proof?
  • RobGMN - Post #5,793 - Yesterday at 12:11 PM: " A ***** is a *****, not a baby."
  • RobGMN - Post #5,583 - Friday at 6:44 PM: " A ***** is not a "living human" until it is born. It is a *****."
All your words! Plain as day! You got caught being wrong so you change your stance while hoping nobody calls you out on it. Guess what? You just got called out!

Apology Please. Or, I'll just settle for a "You're right."


And yet people chose to walk away from their job instead of getting vaxxed. Approximately 5% of the unvaxxed public makes that claim.
But wait. I thought people were FORCED to get it?
You mean people were able to make their own CHOICE? How can that be?

Stop gaslighting. Show me a case of someone who was forced to take the jab or forced to wear a mask.

And. what hospital did you work for that doesn't require healthcare workers to be vaccinated?


If you lost the job for not getting vaxed, then you could not have been forced to get vaxxed.


Apology for what? Pointing out your false arguments, claims, and gaslighting?

Provide proof of just ONE person who was jabbed without giving permission for the jab.
Provide proof of just ONE person who was forced to wear a mask against their consent to wear a mask.
Tell us what hospital you worked for that didn't require healthcare workers to be vaccinated prior to COVID.
already answered that
Prove that I claimed a human ***** was not human.
See above. Plain as day!
I'm STILL waiting for proof of a god beyond the gaslighting claim that the existence of things is proof of a god.
But, I'll probably never see those proof either, gaslighter.
So, now you are calling me something, again, because I called you one? That's pretty creative of you. So, if I tell you're ugly, you're going to call me ugly right back? You really do have childish mind.
 
Rob asked me to show him proof that he claimed a ***** was not human. I just showed him two examples, and it's truly clear that he claimed a ***** is not human. It will be interesting to see how he squirms out of this. He'll probably say something like "Well, Trump is orange."
 
Rob asked me to show him proof that he claimed a ***** was not human. I just showed him two examples, and it's truly clear that he claimed a ***** is not human. It will be interesting to see how he squirms out of this. He'll probably say something like "Well, Trump is orange."
He just said he would admit he was wrong if someone would prove him wrong but the thing is... he won't admit it because he won't accept it.
 
Already provided you the definition of "forced." Only someone gaslighting would think other than the true definition.
The defintion of "forced" is not showing me proof that someone was vaxed against their will or wore a mask against their will.
Do you think a definition of "god" is proof that one exists?
Are you ready to apologize?
Here's your proof?
  • RobGMN - Post #5,793 - Yesterday at 12:11 PM: " A ***** is a *****, not a baby."
I fail to see the word "human" in there.
Can you highlight it, perhaps?
  • RobGMN - Post #5,583 - Friday at 6:44 PM: " A ***** is not a "living human" until it is born. It is a *****."
Here, I'll REPEAT IT: " A ***** is not a living human until it is born. It is a *****."
It's not a living human. It's a ***** attached to the uterus of the woman carrying it. A human *****.

A living human is not the same as "human". It is "human" the second those human cells merge to create the single-celled zygote. Do you think a zygote is a living human? Do you think blastocytes are a living human?

Would you consider this "a living human"?
1733883125868.png

How about this?
1733883088017.png

All your words! Plain as day! You got caught being wrong so you change your stance while hoping nobody calls you out on it. Guess what? You just got called out!
"Called out"? You offered a definition of something to prove the existence of that something. That's not how it works.
Tell me that you think a zygote is "a living human".

Apology Please. Or, I'll just settle for a "You're right."
already answered that
"answered that". With no proof? That's not an answer; it's just your claim.
See above. Plain as day!

So, now you are calling me something, again, because I called you one? That's pretty creative of you. So, if I tell you're ugly, you're going to call me ugly right back? You really do have childish mind.
If the shoe fits...
And if you dislike being called names, then maybe don't call others names?

He just said he would admit he was wrong if someone would prove him wrong but the thing is... he won't admit it because he won't accept it.
How many times have I asked you to prove me wrong? Hundreds? Thousands?
If I asked you five questions right now that could prove me wrong, would you answer them, in order, with proofs, and without ad-hominem, circular references, or some form of "because I said so"?
Would you be willing to take that challenge right now?

Everyone could witness it, and you could make the post number part of your signature for posterity.
 
Last edited:
Here, I'll REPEAT IT: " A ***** is not a living human until it is born. It is a *****."
It's not a living human. It's a ***** attached to the uterus of the woman carrying it. A human *****.

A living human is not the same as "human". It is "human" the second those human cells merge to create the single-celled zygote. Do you think a zygote is a living human? Do you think blastocytes are a living human?

Would you consider this "a living human"?
I really hope you're not a parent...
 
The defintion of "forced" is not showing me proof that someone was vaxed against their will or wore a mask against their will.
Do you think a definition of "god" is proof that one exists?

I fail to see the word "human" in there.
Can you highlight it, perhaps?

Here, I'll REPEAT IT: " A ***** is not a living human until it is born. It is a *****."
It's not a living human. It's a ***** attached to the uterus of the woman carrying it. A human *****.

A living human is not the same as "human". It is "human" the second those human cells merge to create the single-celled zygote. Do you think a zygote is a living human? Do you think blastocytes are a living human?

Would you consider this "a living human"?
View attachment 61869
How about this?
View attachment 61868

"Called out"? You offered a definition of something to prove the existence of that something. That's not how it works.
Tell me that you think a zygote is "a living human".


"answered that". With no proof? That's not an answer; it's just your claim.

If the shoe fits...
And if you dislike being called names, then maybe don't call others names?


How many times have I asked you to prove me wrong? Hundreds? Thousands?
If I asked you five questions right now that could prove me wrong, would you answer them, in order, with proofs, and without ad-hominem, circular references, or some form of "because I said so"?
Would you be willing to take that challenge right now?

Everyone could witness it, and you could make the post number part of your signature for posterity.
Oh my god! You are really arguing the actual definition of a *****. It's official, Rob is a troll and he is trolling this site. He now thinks he knows better than the scholars who define words. The definitions are clear what a Zygote is and what a ***** is. You are a ******* clown. Go the **** away.
 
The issue is that too many people don't see the big picture. I bet the following hypothetical would not be understood by 80-90% of the people who read it:

Imagine a society of 1,000 people. They all work for the one company that exists, making a product they all consume as fast as it is produced. They must buy the product.
They all get paid $10 per hour. The item they make must be sold at double what it costs to make.

How long will it take before things fail?

Now, let's scale it up to a country.
Bring all mfg back to America. Employers will only pay employees 1/5 to 1/3 of their output.
The employees now must buy the product for 3-5X what they got paid to make it.
How fast do they spend all they earned, and have to buy on credit?

And people wonder why we buy goods from China at 1/5 what we'd have to pay for them if made here...
Tariffs worked in past. Also I don't think manufactures can get away with paying China wages like your post suggest. And if they can pay China wages, why can't they keep prices ~steady?
 
Don't worry I'm sure he's just gonna BS you about the meaning of force and play these little ***** games about what the word force means. You know he knows what force means and he's just being a complete jackass. Such as lose your job or take the jab that's force. Wear this mask or you can't participate in society, etc. There's no way he's that retarded. It's just not possible, nobody is that retarded and can also use a keyboard
Ironically, this is the same game he and THX play with the word 'in' except the roles are reversed.
 
Oh my god! You are really arguing the actual definition of a *****. It's official, Rob is a troll and he is trolling this site. He now thinks he knows better than the scholars who define words. The definitions are clear what a Zygote is and what a ***** is. You are a ******* clown. Go the **** away.
Words are kind of important when discussing things. Like when you use your own personal definition for "in" when you say there are no nerves "in" bones. A definition that NO ONE else uses.
It creates a communication problem. And then you cry that no one can comprehend what you are saying.
Of course they can't, because you speak your own damn language where you use English words but with different definitions.

Tell us more about how the medical field is confused and uses the word "in" when they "should" be saying "passing through".
Tell me how "tautology" is when you say the same thing twice.
Tell me how you use "an" prior to a word beginning with a consonant "y".
Tell me how averages aren't "real" and how the average cannot be part of the set used to calculate an average.
Tell me how with regards to your skills, "in your wheelhouse" describes you being in a shelter on a ship and "sounds ignorant".
GMAFB with "scholars" and "definitions". You have the language skills of a fifth-grader.


So you won't accept my challenge, then? 'Just going to continue to refuse to answer questions, and then cry when I ask them again because they haven't been answered?

You have a perfect and easy opportunity to prove me wrong, but are not going to take it, why?
 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,735
Views
448,742
Last reply date
Last reply from
ThxOne
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top