Current events discussion

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I still find it interesting liberals had no problems with Trump until he got that "R" behind his name

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I still find it interesting liberals had no problems with Trump until he got that "R" behind his name

It's sad how people will turn their backs on someone because they want to do what they think is right.

 

[Speed Chaser]

 

[Speed Chaser]

It's sad how people will turn their backs on someone because they want to do what they think is right.

Don't worry when it stops being trendy to hate on Trump they come back like snakes and act like they were cool the whole time just look at Snoop Dog.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Again, I am not claiming any of that. Clearly you do not pay attention even after things are explained to you. You literally ignore all explanations so you can continue to be a jerk.

#1 it's not an associates degree.

OK. So your spent FOUR years not learning things. Cool.

#2 I never claimed I know more, I pointed out a mistake. A valid mistake.

" If I have a degree and another person has the same degree. What makes that other person more of an expert than me in the field that the same degree was earned?"
"What makes them any more of an expert than me? They went to college and got degrees, so did I. I am sure we have learned many of the same things... so why am I different? Because I may have a different view or opinions? Are my thoughts not valid unless the fall in line with everyone else?"

#3 I never claimed I know more about innervation than the medical industry, I declared that you don't comprehend what you are reading about what innervation is and that I literally know more than YOU about the topic.

With you claim that all of medical science is wrong when they say bones are innervated, then you are by default claiming you know more. That's how it works.

#4 You are willfully ignoring the literal definitions and uses of the word Bridge that are applicable so you can select an example of the word that is not so you can then argue. Is the trophy that important Rob?

Ignoring "literal definitions"? What "literal definitions" am I ignoring?
The literal definition of "bridge" in electronics: "A bridge circuit is one kind of electrical circuit wherein the two branches of the circuit are linked to a third branch –which is connected in between the first two branches at some middle point along with them. The bridge circuit was mainly designed for measurement purposes in the laboratory."
There is literally NO definition with regards to electronics where "bridge" means the verb "touch two circuits or wires directly to each other".
There is literally NO definition in electronics where "bridge" is a noun that describes" touching two circuits or wires directly to each other".

All of these arguments where you insist you are right after being proved irrefutably wrong only open your future posts to being assumed wrong or a lie right off the bat.
Hate being called out on it? Maybe don't do it.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

OK. So your spent FOUR years not learning things. Cool.

Riiiiiiight. Good one.

View attachment 56743
" If I have a degree and another person has the same degree. What makes that other person more of an expert than me in the field that the same degree was earned?"
"What makes them any more of an expert than me? They went to college and got degrees, so did I. I am sure we have learned many of the same things... so why am I different? Because I may have a different view or opinions? Are my thoughts not valid unless the fall in line with everyone else?"

It's a question not a claim.

With you claim that all of medical science is wrong when they say bones are innervated, then you are by default claiming you know more. That's how it works.

I never actually did such a thing. I know in your head that is how it played out but you're deranged anyway so.

Ignoring "literal definitions"? What "literal definitions" am I ignoring?
The literal definition of "bridge" in electronics: "A bridge circuit is one kind of electrical circuit wherein the two branches of the circuit are linked to a third branch –which is connected in between the first two branches at some middle point along with them. The bridge circuit was mainly designed for measurement purposes in the laboratory."
There is literally NO definition with regards to electronics where "bridge" means the verb "touch two circuits or wires directly to each other".
There is literally NO definition in electronics where "bridge" is a noun that describes" touching two circuits or wires directly to each other".

So when you solder two separate wires to a piece of copper... can the electrons cross that BRIDGE? Yes or No?
Can you achieve the exact same effect by twisting the two wires together... removing the gap that was between them allowing the electrons to flow from one wire to the other? Yes or No?

All of these arguments where you insist you are right after being proved irrefutably wrong only open your future posts to being assumed wrong or a lie right off the bat.
Hate being called out on it? Maybe don't do it.

Stop thinking that you are "irrefutably proving me wrong" as that is what keeps hanging you up. If you are wrong then how the hell are you proving me to be anything????

Now, answer the questions numbnuts or move on.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

He could easily PM me all this stupid crap instead of talking about off topic stuff. I guess his ego wont let him.

Are those Trump shoes real????

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Ignoring "literal definitions"? What "literal definitions" am I ignoring?
The literal definition of "bridge" in electronics: "A bridge circuit is one kind of electrical circuit wherein the two branches of the circuit are linked to a third branch –which is connected in between the first two branches at some middle point along with them. The bridge circuit was mainly designed for measurement purposes in the laboratory."
There is literally NO definition with regards to electronics where "bridge" means the verb "touch two circuits or wires directly to each other".
There is literally NO definition in electronics where "bridge" is a noun that describes" touching two circuits or wires directly to each other".

Is there a definition that explains why you were the only one that couldn't comprehend the thread was about a monoblock?

Double negative and postive outputs?! Plesse help...

I have been gone from car audio for a good 10 years and recently decided to get back into it. As I'm building my first new system I noticed almost all new amps have double outputs now... my question is, can I just ignore 1 set of them if I'm using a mono Amp for 2 subs? I'm trying to do a...

www.caraudio.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I still find it interesting liberals had no problems with Trump until he got that "R" behind his name

You mean like when Trump changed his party affiliation five times and was thus anti-whatever-party-he-did-not-belong-to with each flip-flop?

Is there a definition that explains why you were the only one that couldn't comprehend the thread was about a monoblock?

Double negative and postive outputs?! Plesse help...

I have been gone from car audio for a good 10 years and recently decided to get back into it. As I'm building my first new system I noticed almost all new amps have double outputs now... my question is, can I just ignore 1 set of them if I'm using a mono Amp for 2 subs? I'm trying to do a...

www.caraudio.com

Are you the only one who didn't notice that he said "almost all new amps have double outputs now", but then asked if he could ignore outputs?
Mono amps don't have double outputs, combined with his telling us he is out of the car audio loop, should cause anyone to question if he knows what he is talking about.
Kind of like the guy who comes on here saying his 12" driver "puts out 300 watts" and then asks what amp to buy,
Or the guy who thinks a system is powered by the alternator and not the battery.

But go ahead and try to cover for Thx and his confusion that mono amps are "bridged internally",
and that two wires touching or even twisted together are "bridged".

Riiiiiiight. Good one.

Thank you.

It's a question not a claim.

And this was covered already, but if you are so ill-informed that you don't know the difference between you and an expert, then you certainly shouldn't be arguing ANYHTING. You are not smart enough to know what you don't know. Go read the paper I linked to earlier.

I never actually did such a thing. I know in your head that is how it played out but you're deranged anyway so.

Sorry sport, but you did. You told us that the ex-Jacksonville Jaguars team doctor said there are no nerves in bones. You forgot his name, though. Kinda like your girlfriend. "You wouldn't know her. She's from Canada". You get so deep in your lies, you simply can't recover.

So when you solder two separate wires to a piece of copper... can the electrons cross that BRIDGE? Yes or No?
Can you achieve the exact same effect by twisting the two wires together... removing the gap that was between them allowing the electrons to flow from one wire to the other? Yes or No?

More red herrings that have NOTHING to do with your claim that two wires touching each other are "bridged" and that mono amps are "bridged internally".
In your example, the copper piece is the "bridge". When it is removed and the wires touched to each other directly, they are "connected" not bridged.
I will bet that everyone here is rolling their eyes at your continuing failure to understand this simple concept, even if they hate me to the core.
Same for your "bones do not have nerves in them" claim, and all of your others.

Stop thinking that you are "irrefutably proving me wrong" as that is what keeps hanging you up. If you are wrong then how the hell are you proving me to be anything????

I've proved you wrong on so many things, I've lost count. Your insistence that you are still right, in the face of incontrovertible proof that are wrong, changes nothing.

Now, answer the questions numbnuts or move on.

More red herrings that have NOTHING to do with your claim that two wires touching each other are "bridged" and that mono amps are "bridged internally".
In your example, the copper piece is the "bridge". When it is removed and the wires touched to each other directly, they are "connected" not bridged.
I will bet that everyone here is rolling their eyes at your continuing failure to understand this simple concept, even if they hate me to the core.
Same for your "bones do not have nerves in them" claim, and all of your others.

Electrons can flow from a wire into a piece of copper then into another wire, assuming they are all connected or at least touching each other. They flow from negative to positive.
In that circuit, the piece of copper is the bridge, and the wires are bridged. Remove the copper and to achieve electron flow, the wires would have to touch each other or another bridge would have to be put in place.

Two wires simply touching other will never be considered "bridged".

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Are you the only one who didn't notice that he said "almost all new amps have double outputs now", but then asked if he could ignore outputs?
Mono amps don't have double outputs, combined with his telling us he is out of the car audio loop, should cause anyone to question if he knows what he is talking about.

You keep explaining everything except how EVERYONE but YOU understood what he was asking...why was that? Why was EVERYONE but YOU able to comprehend the question?

That's a real simple question with no need for you to "research" or show diagrams...

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[Speed Chaser]

"The tolerant and peaceful left, as portrayed by the media, is already threatening people who wear the Trump sneakers. Just like they targeted individuals simply for wearing a hat associated with Trump.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

"The tolerant and peaceful left, as portrayed by the media, is already threatening people who wear the Trump sneakers. Just like they targeted individuals simply for wearing a hat associated with Trump.

Democratz want a race war.....its obvious

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I love wear my Maga hat occasionally...not because I'm huge Trump fan...but because I
enjoy seeing people emotionally meltdown over a $10 hat

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I love wear my Maga hat occasionally...not because I'm huge Trump fan...but because I
enjoy seeing people emotionally meltdown over a $10 hat

I suppose you're dumb enough to open carry too?

Protesting COVID. Were they going to shoot it if it got too close?

Armed Republicans skulking around a polling center.
Were they trying to intimidate Democrat voters? Maybe stop them from voting?