Why do you need proof? It's what the right-wing Christians believe. Are you saying if it's not real, then they are not practicing cannibalism if they truly believe the bread and wine is the body and blood?I'm gonna need some proof Christ was a human being, or else your whole argument is invalid, because that's what you're arguing. So, you prove it if you wanna say right wingers are cannibals for drinking wine and eating bread
And fyi, I'm not a Christian or a right winger, but your argument is that Christians are cannibals because they eat the bread and wine of the body of Christ, so I need you to prove Christ was a human with a body in the first place.
The right-wing Christians truly believe the bread and wine has transubstantiated into blood and flesh of a human.
With that belief, they are willingly practicing cannibalism by eating it.
Explain which part of that I am getting wrong.
You are attempting to spin away from the FACT that Christians believe in transubstantiation of bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ. They consider it a a fact. A truth. As such, they are willingly practicing cannibalism when they eat and drink what they truly believe is the body and blood of Christ.
Explain which part i got wrong.
(Same answer to your very similar questions that you posted separately, in case you didn't notice)
Last edited:
