As I have said before, you are ignorant to the terminology but want to quote passages and text as if by doing so you have any clue about anything. That's the difference, you and I can both quote the same thing however I have been educated to the meanings. You have not. Keep failing Rob.
And yet you openly and boldly deny that medical texts, Federal Regulation, mathematical theory, are wrong, simply because you BELIEVE it.
Do you see the dichotomy there?
The difference is that when I read stuff or hear stuff, I DO understand, AND I can equate what is being said to other parts of life.
Like when a nuclear physicist starts explaining targeted radiation therapy to me, and I can immediately say "same concept they use when they make 3D images in glass by crossing lasers at specific X,Y,Z coordinates to microfracture the glass" and he says "exactly".
And if I DON'T understand and am interested, I make the effort to LEARN.
As opposed to you, who just continues to insist your beliefs override any facts that are out there because you "say so" or you "question" or "think outside the box".
I can provide multiple dozens of examples of you doing it, but if I did I am confident you would call them all lies and then spin off on some tangent like saying I eat diick or something.
FFS, I am STILL waiting for you to disprove bone innervation with more than hearsay or your personal belief. STILL.
Because that is what you do.
blog.equalrightsinstitute.com
