What is?

[djdilliodon!]

Biden was impeached?
How’d I miss that one?

Not yet but the inquiry is happening. We shall see how it goes. It only requires a simple majority in the house. Should be interesting to see how this goes.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

They didn’t see it. Yet they gave an opinion on what they didn’t see. As I said.

Try to comprehend. Try to keep up.

You try to comprehend this. I said I WILL GO RESEARCH IT FOR MYSELF THEN COMMENT. That means I will have seen it at that point. Idiot.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Not yet but the inquiry is happening. We shall see how it goes. It only requires a simple majority in the house. Should be interesting to see how this goes.

I looked it up. They want to impeach when they admit they have nothing to show that he did anything?
That's basically them admitting it's a revenge move.
Weird.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I wonder if the house impeaches Biden, will the Senate hold a witnessless trial for Sleepy Joe?

That's the way it works, right?
Or will he go the opposite and invite ALL witnesses?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You try to comprehend this. I said I WILL GO RESEARCH IT FOR MYSELF THEN COMMENT. That means I will have seen it at that point. Idiot.

Never saw that claim in the past. You always just responded to defend Trump.
What "research" did you do to figure out that the documents were only "alleged" to be classified, even after he and his lawyers admitted publicly that he took classified documents?
What "research" did you do before proclaiming the incidents of Jan 6th were only "alleged" to have happened?
What "research" did you complete to verify that Trump lost due to millions of "stolen" votes.

Don;t bother to answer those questions.
They were rhetorical.
We know you didn't do any research at all, and were just replying with a knee-jerk protection of Trump.

Had you done any research, you would know have made the claims.
Unless you completely **** at research and comprehension.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[djdilliodon!]

I looked it up. They want to impeach when they admit they have nothing to show that he did anything?
That's basically them admitting it's a revenge move.
Weird.

That is the left wing narrative. This is an inquiry which gives them the power to dig deeper. They have the receipts on hunter taking in $20+ million now I believe the total is with many messages from him stating his dad is involved. Of course some say Joe Biden had nothing to do with it and say hunter used his dads position to make it seem like he was selling access with Joe Biden not knowing. This inquiry will give them the power to dig deeper and see if Joe was involved. If he does get impeached though, be ready for it cause you 1000% know people on the right will do exactly what people on the left do. They will say he is an impeached president even though both impeachments would be by the party with the majority (partisan). I’m more interested to see what happens to hunter in all this. The way Joe is I can’t see this guy making it to run again. His press secretary had to pull him off the stage recently and they cut his mic off. Poor guy might live another year

 

[djdilliodon!]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

That is the left wing narrative. This is an inquiry which gives them the power to dig deeper. They have the receipts on hunter taking in $20+ million now I believe the total is with many messages from him stating his dad is involved. Of course some say Joe Biden had nothing to do with it and say hunter used his dads position to make it seem like he was selling access with Joe Biden not knowing. This inquiry will give them the power to dig deeper and see if Joe was involved. If he does get impeached though, be ready for it cause you 1000% know people on the right will do exactly what people on the left do. They will say he is an impeached president even though both impeachments would be by the party with the majority (partisan). I’m more interested to see what happens to hunter in all this. The way Joe is I can’t see this guy making it to run again. His press secretary had to pull him off the stage recently and they cut his mic off. Poor guy might live another year

Assuming we are talking about Burisma, the head of Burisma (not a left wing narrative) has said Joe was not involved.
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/VPanswersJuly7th2019.pdf

If he does get impeached, the right SHOULD say he has been impeached. It'd be a fact. Just like Clinton was impeached. There is no denying it.

I think there should be a debate between Joe and Donald. It'd be like watching Sinatra in his final performances.
Microphone upside down, using all the wrong words.

 

[djdilliodon!]

Assuming we are talking about Burisma, the head of Burisma (not a left wing narrative) has said Joe was not involved.
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/VPanswersJuly7th2019.pdf

If he does get impeached, the right SHOULD say he has been impeached. It'd be a fact. Just like Clinton was impeached. There is no denying it.

I think there should be a debate between Joe and Donald. It'd be like watching Sinatra in his final performances.
Microphone upside down, using all the wrong words.

I don’t think it would be in that persons best interest to say he was involved or anyone else for that matter cause that implicates you as well knowing it was wrong to do in the first place. With time we will for sure see what this all leads to. I’m pretty confident hunter is gonna get screwed but we shall see.

I don’t think there is a chance biden will debate trump. If Biden makes it that far I sure hope that happens cause that will most certainly make for some great entertainment .

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Never saw that claim in the past. You always just responded to defend Trump.
What "research" did you do to figure out that the documents were only "alleged" to be classified, even after he and his lawyers admitted publicly that he took classified documents?
What "research" did you do before proclaiming the incidents of Jan 6th were only "alleged" to have happened?
What "research" did you complete to verify that Trump lost due to millions of "stolen" votes.

Don;t bother to answer those questions.
They were rhetorical.
We know you didn't do any research at all, and were just replying with a knee-jerk protection of Trump.

Had you done any research, you would know have made the claims.
Unless you completely **** at research and comprehension.

I'm not defending Trump you childish twirp. I am defending actions. Actions people like you throw fits over or think that because you don't like the choices someone else makes they should be punished. I'm defending against tyranny.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I'm not defending Trump you childish twirp. I am defending actions. Actions people like you throw fits over or think that because you don't like the choices someone else makes they should be punished. I'm defending against tyranny.

HAHAHAHAHA "I'm defending against tyranny"
That's even better than you claiming you simply "question" and think "outside of the box" after you've been proved wrong.

Thank you for a good laugh.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

HAHAHAHAHA "I'm defending against tyranny"
That's even better than you claiming you simply "question" and think "outside of the box" after you've been proved wrong.

Thank you for a good laugh.

Put it in your sig.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Put it in your sig.

Not enough room. You have to share space with other dumb quotes.