What is?

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What kind of lessons? You are the one who said you were IGNORING it but that you also LOOKED. You can't ignore it once you have seen it.

Another display of your limited ability to comprehend anything beyond the simplest sentences.
I’ll give you another lesson. Here’s what I posted: “You say “view” as if you actually proved your argument, but I’m just ignoring it.”
It’s a complex sentence, with a phrase removed for simplification.
Instead of “You say ‘view’ as if you actually proved your argument, but I’m just ignoring the fact that you actually proved your argument”, I simplified the rest of the sentence to “it”. “It” referencing the alleged proof of argument.
I guess this one would really confuse you too: “I told Steve to bring charcoal to the barbecue, but he didn’t bring it.”
I thought you might be smart enough to comprehend the sentence, but obviously not.

YOU are the one who thinks they are right. We wouldn't be arguing if you didn't.

You’re the one arguing what you believe is the correct use of the word. It’s your argument, so it’s your opportunity to be incorrect.
And you are.

Close enough that you have gotten it wrong a couple of times now by trying to label me a masochist. Yes, almost identical meanings and yes they are the opposites to each other. I know, your mind is blown by the existence of things that are so similar but are opposites.

Opposite yet almost identical?
Tell us more about that.
What other opposites are almost identical?
Daylight and pitch dark?
Ice cold and boiling hot?
Rough as 60 grit, but smooth as glass?

No. None of those work.
Give us some examples.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

If you don’t enjoy it in some way, then why keep doing it?

Wouldn't you like to know.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Another display of your limited ability to comprehend anything beyond the simplest sentences.

Tell me how you are ignoring it.

You’re the one arguing what you believe is the correct use of the word. It’s your argument, so it’s your opportunity to be incorrect.
And you are.

Prove me wrong.

Opposite yet almost identical?
Tell us more about that.
What other opposites are almost identical?
Daylight and pitch dark?
Ice cold and boiling hot?
Rough as 60 grit, but smooth as glass?

No. None of those work.
Give us some examples.

Wow your brain has really locked up huh. I almost forgot that your brain is Black or White. Nothing but facts. Trapped in a box. It is impossible for you to imagine anything you can't directly look up on the internet.

Both get pleasure - Same
Both involve pain - Same
One gives the pain the other receives it.

You being the sad assshole you are that can't wrap your tiny brain around that now wants to be sarcastic and make a list that has nothing to do with my statement in hopes of misdirecting the fact that you have limited brain function.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So, is anyone getting the new covid shot? Rob, you should get it and tell us how it works for you.

If the variant comes this way and is doing major damage, I probably will.
If there is no threat, I probably won't.
It's kind of like flood insurance. We'd have to have a flood of Gilgamesh (the epic flood fable the Noah fable was based on) proportions for my house to be threatened. With those odds, I don't think it's necessary.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Tell me how you are ignoring it.

Prove me wrong.

Wow your brain has really locked up huh. I almost forgot that your brain is Black or White. Nothing but facts. Trapped in a box. It is impossible for you to imagine anything you can't directly look up on the internet.

Both get pleasure - Same
Both involve pain - Same
One gives the pain the other receives it.

You being the sad assshole you are that can't wrap your tiny brain around that now wants to be sarcastic and make a list that has nothing to do with my statement in hopes of misdirecting the fact that you have limited brain function.

So a giver and a taker are identical?
Then you as a taxpayer are identical to the government as a tax taker?
A man with Down's Syndrome and an IQ is identical to Stephen Hawking? Both humans!
Peter Dinklage is identical to Lebron James? Both humans!
Your Ford Escape is identical to a McLaren Artura? Both cars!
Your brother's house is identical to the Biltmore? Both houses!

I don't think so, kid.
It's not how identical works, kid.
identical - "similar in every detail; exactly alike"
When the one detail is such a primary detail (like being a giver versus a taker, a genius versus an idiot, a hypercar versus a rusty shitbox), the idea of "identical" goes right out the window.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So a giver and a taker are identical?

See, you're doing it again. I even listed the things that are the same and here you are, being you. You know good and damn well that the giver and taker part are the opposite parts of this example. Do you derive joy from being an assshole all your life?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

See, you're doing it again. I even listed the things that are the same and here you are, being you. You know good and damn well that the giver and taker part are the opposite parts of this example. Do you derive joy from being an assshole all your life?

Yes. You listed similarities between two things to try and prove that they are identical.
Well, aside from the height differences, Peter and LeBron ore obviously identical because they are humans, right? The McLaren and the For are identical because they are 4-wheel motorized vehicles that get you form point A to point B.

As usual, you painted yourself into a corner you can't get out of.
Sorry, that may be confusing to you. I'll try again "As you usually do in circumstances such as we are encountering here, you painted yourself into a corner."

And you should know this at your advanced age, but using pejoratives doesn't make your argument any stronger, or correct. It just makes it more obvious you have nothing to back up what you say.
Chirp, chirp, chirp.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Yes. You listed similarities between two things to try and prove that they are identical.
Well, aside from the height differences, Peter and LeBron ore obviously identical because they are humans, right? The McLaren and the For are identical because they are 4-wheel motorized vehicles that get you form point A to point B.

As usual, you painted your self into a corner you can't get out of.
And you should know this at your advanced age, but using pejoratives doesn't make your argument any stronger, or correct. It makes it more obvious you have nothing to back up what you say.
Chirp, chirp, chirp.

I know, we all know. Every time you can't comprehend something we all paint ourselves into corners blah blah blah. Go finish your afternoon cock snack.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I know, we all know. Every time you can't comprehend something we all paint ourselves into corners blah blah blah. Go finish your afternoon cock snack.

"Comprehend". Says the guy who thinks a sadist and a masochist are identical because they are people who do something.
The guy who think's "who's" is the same as "whose".
The guy who thinks "too" should be used as an infinitive marker.
The guy who got confused by a compound sentence because it had been simplified.
The guy who thinks based on what the polls tell him to think. (That sentence could have ended at "to", but I didn't want you to get confused and sad again).

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"Comprehend". Says the guy who thinks a sadist and a masochist are identical because they are people who do something.
The guy who think's "who's" is the same as "whose".
The guy who thinks "too" should be used as an infinitive marker.
The guy who got confused by a compound sentence because it had been simplified.
The guy who thinks based on what the polls tell him to think. (That sentence could have ended at "to", but I didn't want you to get confused and sad again).

I did not say they are identical.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

From post #18,279

"Almost identical meanings you jackasss except one receives and the other gives. Seriously, smarten up kid."

The underlined being what makes them not identical. I know, you just want to argue so continue.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

From post #18,279

"Almost identical meanings you jackasss except one receives and the other gives. Seriously, smarten up kid."

The underlined being what makes them not identical. I know, you just want to argue so continue.

OK. ALMOST identical.
Peter and LeBron are ALMOST identical because they are both humans.
The Ford and the McLaren are ALMOST identical because they are both vehicles.
The sadist and the masochist are ALMOST identical because they are humans doing something, except one gets gratification from giving pain (or a version of it) while the other gets pleasure from receiving pain (or some version of it).
The thief and the victim are ALMOST identical, except one takes the property and the other one loses it.

Good stuff.
It's really wild how you come up with shit to explain your inability to comprehend.
Does it date back further than your claim that the medical science world is using a special-definition version of the word "in" when they say that bones have nerves IN them? I'm pretty sure that kerfuffle predates the claim that "bridged" means two things physically touching each other.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

OK. ALMOST identical.
Peter and LeBron are ALMOST identical because they are both humans.
The Ford and the McLaren are ALMOST identical because they are both vehicles.
The sadist and the masochist are ALMOST identical because they are humans doing something, except one gets gratification from giving pain (or a version of it) while the other gets pleasure from receiving pain (or some version of it).
The thief and the victim are ALMOST identical, except one takes the property and the other one loses it.

Good stuff.
It's really wild how you come up with shit to explain your inability to comprehend.
Does it date back further than your claim that the medical science world is using a special-definition version of the word "in" when they say that bones have nerves IN them? I'm pretty sure that kerfuffle predates the claim that "bridged" means two things physically touching each other.

Don't be upset Rob. You thought you had me but all you had to do was read. Now that you have lost you try to bring up more shit to attempt a recovery of your bruised ego.

You need facts. It is a fact that almost identical means they are not identical. See, facts aren't just for you to argue with.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Don't be upset Rob. You thought you had me but all you had to do was read. Now that you have lost you try to bring up more shit to attempt a recovery of your bruised ego.

You need facts. It is a fact that almost identical means they are not identical. See, facts aren't just for you to argue with.

"Bringing up more shit"? You mean talking about your confusion of the correct usage of "too" and "to", "who's" and "whose", "sadist" and "masochist"?
I thought that WAS the stuff we were talking about, since you refuse to discuss your plan for reducing inflation faster that it is already dropping.

I guess I missed the newest topic tangent you tossed.
Maybe I was too busy marveling how it's almost identical outside today as it was last Christmas, except for the lack of snow, and being about 70 degrees warmer...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"Bringing up more shit"? You mean talking about your confusion of the correct usage of "too" and "to", "who's" and "whose", "sadist" and "masochist"?
I thought that WAS the stuff we were talking about, since you refuse to discuss your plan for reducing inflation faster that it is already dropping.

I guess I missed the newest topic tangent you tossed.
Maybe I was too busy marveling how it's almost identical outside today as it was last Christmas, except for the lack of snow, and being about 70 degrees warmer...

Yeah, bringing up more shit.

"Good stuff.
It's really wild how you come up with shit to explain your inability to comprehend.
Does it date back further than your claim that the medical science world is using a special-definition version of the word "in" when they say that bones have nerves IN them? I'm pretty sure that kerfuffle predates the claim that "bridged" means two things physically touching each other." - The lover of ***** Men, RobGMN

When you lose you are ALL OVER THE PLACE.