- Status
That’s the problem with you instant-gratification seeking millennials.
No desire or ability to deal with a long haul.
When you consider the medical advice from a politician to carry more weight than medical advice from thousands of doctors.
Willful ignorance is frighteningly prevalent in this country.
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Good thing that post you quoted isn't "advise" but is rather just a STATEMENT.
The bad thing is dumb people take such statements and use them as the basis for adviCe and personal decision-making.
Building a structure on a foundation of sand, as it were.
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
“Does this mean that the CDC believes that the mRNA Covid-19 injections are so safe, there is no need to monitor adverse event reports any longer? What is the argument against continued monitoring, especially since the V-safe website was already up and paid for?
While CDC’s V-safe was stealthily and abruptly turned off, refusing to accept new safety reports, to this very day the CDC continues to urge everyone ages 6 months and older to stay up to date with COVID-19 vaccines and boosters.”
“Unlike my old Bronco, mRNA injections have only been on the market for about twoyears, and according to the FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database, mRNA “vaccines” have been named the primary suspect in over 1.5 million adverse event reports, of which there are >20,000 heart attacks and >27,000 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis just in the USA alone. Worldwide numbers would be greater. According to many references, including an FDA-funded study out of Harvard, VAERS reports represent fewer than 1 percent of vaccine adverse events that actually occur.”
CDC Now Refusing New COVID Vaccine Adverse Event Reports in Its V-Safe Program
In George Orwell’s 1984, characters are told by The Party to “reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.” The CDC isn’t even allowing evidence.
brownstone.org
So he’s mad they took away an app used for reporting adverse events (the app being the ONLY way), while VAERS (with its multiple methods of reporting an event) remains active.
“Does this mean that the CDC believes that the mRNA Covid-19 injections are so safe, there is no need to monitor adverse event reports any longer? What is the argument against continued monitoring, especially since the V-safe website was already up and paid for?
While CDC’s V-safe was stealthily and abruptly turned off, refusing to accept new safety reports, to this very day the CDC continues to urge everyone ages 6 months and older to stay up to date with COVID-19 vaccines and boosters.”
“Unlike my old Bronco, mRNA injections have only been on the market for about twoyears, and according to the FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database, mRNA “vaccines” have been named the primary suspect in over 1.5 million adverse event reports, of which there are >20,000 heart attacks and >27,000 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis just in the USA alone. Worldwide numbers would be greater. According to many references, including an FDA-funded study out of Harvard, VAERS reports represent fewer than 1 percent of vaccine adverse events that actually occur.”
CDC Now Refusing New COVID Vaccine Adverse Event Reports in Its V-Safe Program
In George Orwell’s 1984, characters are told by The Party to “reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.” The CDC isn’t even allowing evidence.
Huh.
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Or lable it as something it isn't so people can be put down.
Looks like Trump adding up his tax deductions.
Last edited:
Jimi77
Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Why are they even talking Covid restrictions?
www.nationalreview.com
Just Say No to New Mandatory Covid Restrictions | National Review
The ‘experts’ are back.
www.nationalreview.com
- Status
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
About this thread
- Start date
- Participants
- Who Replied
- Replies
- 19,273
- Views
- 802,839
- Last reply date
- Last reply from
- administrator
