- Status
"Finding"and "fabricating" mean the same thing?
Last edited:
Can you show me where he asked/says this? A real quote/transcript perhaps? Opinions are not facts
Last edited:
Sorry, sport. It was posted and acknowledged. Even djdillodon who does not agree with me said that the words I posted were not a direct quote of Trump's words.
Keep failing.
If the votes did not exist, tehn asking them to be "found" is asking for them to be fabricated.
The only way to "find" something that does not exist is to fabricate it.
If they DID exist and Brad knew where they "were", then Brad has a hand in vote manipulation, and Trump is advising him on what to do with the votes.
Sop let's keep it simple:
Do you think the votes existed, or not?
So if i ask my wife to go find my car keys....she has to create a new pair to find them? How do you personally know the votes didnt exist?
Last edited:
That doesn't have a thing to do with your lie that I claimed those were his words.
A lie that you insisted was truth over and over and over again, even when there was irrefutable proof you were lying.
So let's speak to that first. Let's discuss your lie where you insisted I claimed those were Trumps words.
Then, lets speak to your attempted lie to show us that Ivermectin was FDA approved for COVID treatment.
Speak to each lie of yours separately. Why did you do them, and why did you keep insisting they were fact?
Jimi77
Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
If the votes existed, then how is it fraud? If existing votes were being withheld, then (Brad) was guilty of stealing the election.
Did the car keys exist? Then obviously not.
If they didn't exist, then you are being dishonest in asking her.
if they didn't exist and you asked her to "find" them, with the implication that something really bad would happen to her, then you would be forcing her to get some fabricated for her own protection.
Kind of like all of Trump's sycophants had to do, or else face his wrath. From being fired, to Trump wanting them hanged.
Noe I'll ask again: Did the votes exist or not?
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
Are you ready for climate lockdowns?
“The science is clear. The world is in a state of climate emergency, and we need to shift into emergency gear.”
www.unep.org
“The science is clear. The world is in a state of climate emergency, and we need to shift into emergency gear.”
The Climate Emergency
The science is clear. The world is in a state of climate emergency, and we need to shift into emergency gear. Humanity’s burning of fossil fuels has emitted enough greenhouse gases (GHGs) to significantly alter the composition of the atmosphere and average world temperature has risen between 1.1...
If they existed but were withheld and Brad had control of them, it's fraud.
Voting had already been well closed when Trump asked on January 2nd for the votes to be "found".
If they existed, then Brad knew they had not been counted, and had control of them.
If they didn't exist, then Brad was being asked to make them up.
Regardless of the reality of the votes, Trump was advising Brad on illegal action regarding votes.
Kind of like a woman offering to pay an undercover cop to kill her husband. It'll never happen b/c it's an undercover cop, but her attempt is illegal.
Please prove the votes did or didnt exist, YOU are making the claim....facts matter, at this point it is just your crazy leftist opinion. Being the "loudest" in the room doesnt make anything you say fact
Last edited:
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
We’re drowning in artificial EMF’s; it’s killing us softly:
“However, there’s limited awareness that certain nonionizing EMFs are also classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as class 2B carcinogens—a category indicating potential human carcinogenicity.”
“Nonionizing radiation doesn’t have enough energy to damage DNA directly. Yet various studies have linked exposure to nonionizing EMFs with DNA breakage. Cells from EMF-exposed animals and phone users have shown genetic damage.”
“For this reason, Dr. Carpenter suggests EMFs may be carcinogenic just by inducing “reactive oxygen species” that stress the cell environment through oxidation. Oxidation generated by EMFs have been shown to break DNA in human sperm and fibroblast cells, indicating potentially carcinogenic risks.”
“Contrastingly, the 2018 U.S. National Toxicology Program study from the 1990s presented “clear evidence” of radiofrequency-induced heart tumors in rats, along with “some evidence” of brain and adrenal cancers.
The Ramazani Institute’s 2018 study also discovered heart and brain tumors in rats, aligning with these findings.”
““Brain gliomas associated with cellphones have the most research. The gliomas appear after 10 years of moderate cellphone use, primarily ipsilateral cancers (cancer on the same side of head where you hold the cellphone),” Professor Emerita Magda Havas told The Epoch Times over email.”
“His research found a 30 percent higher likelihood of brain tumors in wireless phone users. These tumors primarily developed on the side of the head in contact with the phone, with an over 60 percent higher risk after 10 years of phone use.”
www.zerohedge.com
“However, there’s limited awareness that certain nonionizing EMFs are also classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as class 2B carcinogens—a category indicating potential human carcinogenicity.”
“Nonionizing radiation doesn’t have enough energy to damage DNA directly. Yet various studies have linked exposure to nonionizing EMFs with DNA breakage. Cells from EMF-exposed animals and phone users have shown genetic damage.”
“For this reason, Dr. Carpenter suggests EMFs may be carcinogenic just by inducing “reactive oxygen species” that stress the cell environment through oxidation. Oxidation generated by EMFs have been shown to break DNA in human sperm and fibroblast cells, indicating potentially carcinogenic risks.”
“Contrastingly, the 2018 U.S. National Toxicology Program study from the 1990s presented “clear evidence” of radiofrequency-induced heart tumors in rats, along with “some evidence” of brain and adrenal cancers.
The Ramazani Institute’s 2018 study also discovered heart and brain tumors in rats, aligning with these findings.”
““Brain gliomas associated with cellphones have the most research. The gliomas appear after 10 years of moderate cellphone use, primarily ipsilateral cancers (cancer on the same side of head where you hold the cellphone),” Professor Emerita Magda Havas told The Epoch Times over email.”
“His research found a 30 percent higher likelihood of brain tumors in wireless phone users. These tumors primarily developed on the side of the head in contact with the phone, with an over 60 percent higher risk after 10 years of phone use.”
EMFs A Possible Human Carcinogen | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
Jimi77
Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
What am I missing here. If Brad was withholding legitimate Trump votes, then Brad is committing fraud not Trump.
- Status
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
About this thread
- Start date
- Participants
- Who Replied
- Replies
- 33,976
- Views
- 1,094,481
- Last reply date
- Last reply from
- Buck
