What is?

[ThxOne Premium Member]

If it's not the booze, then why the stupid conclusions, theories, opinions?
Dehydration from lack of bowel control?

Says the guy who has ****** relations with 2nd graders.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So if someone doesn't share your fears or concerns you feel the need to put them down by claiming them a "tough guy" or "stupid"...guess that really says a lot about you as a person right there...

Nope. Just common sense.
Something that is severely lacking in the general public these days.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Nope. Just common sense.
Something that is severely lacking in the general public these days.

So now if someone doesn't share your concerns or fears...they lack common sense...

You gonna keep talking down on anyone that don't think like you?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Nope.

You HAVEN'T touted your degree as a reason you know so much more about those subjects than everyone else?
Hmmm, your posts say otherwise.

WOW. The joke being that is how you see non Biden voters.

You need to learn what a joke is. Maybe humor in general.

You're an idiot.

Say the guy who thinks this is a "joke": "How will I infect all those godless democrats with my orange man COVID if I don't venture out???"
I suggest you avoid open mic night at the Comedy Patch.

You can quote shit till you are blue in the face but 99.4% of the time you have no idea what you are posting

Not only do I know what I'M posting, I know what YOU are posting. It seem you often forget.
Remember that time you claimed it was illegal for a person to work without getting paid for it? Or when you claimed the division of Red v. Blue states was faked in order to make the Republicans look bad? Or that time you claimed supply and demand were not a factor in gas prices?
Now THAT is humor, not statements about "godless Democrats", lol.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So now if someone doesn't share your concerns or fears...they lack common sense...
You gonna keep talking down on anyone that don't think like you?

Yes. Anyone who is not concerned or has no fear about things that have such destructive potential lacks common sense.
Self-preservation is coded into us as a #1 priority. Ignoring or avoiding self-preservation indicates no commons sense.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 50501

Share the article instead of a meme.
Share the stats instead of a meme.
Share facts instead of a meme.

If you're using memes, Farcebook, Twatter, Douche Social, etc, as your source of info, you are likely a moron.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Yes. Anyone who is not concerned or has no fear about things that have such destructive potential lacks common sense.
Self-preservation is coded into us as a #1 priority. Ignoring or avoiding self-preservation indicates no commons sense.

So your take on any scenario is the correct one and the whole world should follow suit behind you...

Yeah that's not being puffed up on yourself in the least...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So your take on any scenario is the correct one and the whole world should follow suit behind you...

Until I am proved wrong, that's certainly the case. As it is with the vast majority of people.
I'll ask: Do you automatically assume every opinion or thought you have is wrong until proved right? Or, do you think you are right until proved wrong (and then continue to think you are right anyway)?

Yeah that's not being puffed up on yourself in the least...

Tell me I'm wrong. Explain how self-preservation is not our innate #1 priority.
Provide something other than "because I said so".
I'll provide this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-preservation#:~:text=Self-preservation is essentially the,it a "survival instinct".

The really good part: "If perceived reproductive potential is low enough, self-destructive behavior (i.e., the opposite) is not uncommon in social species."
i.e. Those who know they are useless to the species are more likely to act in self-destructive ways.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Tell me I'm wrong. Explain how self-preservation is not our innate #1 priority.
Provide something other than "because I said so".
I'll provide this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-preservation#:~:text=Self-preservation is essentially the,it a "survival instinct".

The really good part: "If perceived reproductive potential is low enough, self-destructive behavior (i.e., the opposite) is not uncommon in social species."
i.e. Those who know they are useless to the species are more likely to act in self-destructive ways.

Like I said...you obviously believe your take on any given situation is the only correct one...and anyone that doesn't follow lead is "lacking common sense" or "survival instinct"...


You are so full of yourself that you can't accept there's more than 1 way (ie your way) to get through any given situation...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Like I said...you obviously believe your take on any given situation is the only correct one...and anyone that doesn't follow lead is "lacking common sense" or "survival instinct"...


You are so full of yourself that you can't accept there's more than 1 way (ie your way) to get through any given situation...

"Like you said" doesn't speak to the facts fo the matter. I'll give it another shot at getting you to go beyond "Because I said so" rhetoric:

Tell me I'm wrong. Explain how self-preservation is not our innate #1 priority.
Provide something other than "because I said so".
I'll provide this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-preservation#:~:text=Self-preservation is essentially the,it a "survival instinct".
The really good part: "If perceived reproductive potential is low enough, self-destructive behavior (i.e., the opposite) is not uncommon in social species."
i.e. Those who know they are useless to the species are more likely to act in self-destructive ways.

Tell me how avoiding or ignoring an innate priority of survival that exists (even at the cellular level) is NOT lacking in common sense.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

"Like you said" doesn't speak to the facts fo the matter. I'll give it another shot at getting you to go beyond "Because I said so" rhetoric:

Tell me I'm wrong. Explain how self-preservation is not our innate #1 priority.
Provide something other than "because I said so".
I'll provide this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-preservation#:~:text=Self-preservation is essentially the,it a "survival instinct".
The really good part: "If perceived reproductive potential is low enough, self-destructive behavior (i.e., the opposite) is not uncommon in social species."
i.e. Those who know they are useless to the species are more likely to act in self-destructive ways.

Tell me how avoiding or ignoring an innate priority of survival that exists (even at the cellular level) is NOT lacking in common sense.

Your take on how others should react is based on a wiki page?

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

Your take on how others should react is based on a wiki page?

Verified facts.....lol

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Yes. Anyone who is not concerned or has no fear about things that have such destructive potential lacks common sense.
Self-preservation is coded into us as a #1 priority. Ignoring or avoiding self-preservation indicates no commons sense.

You mean destructive potential and ignoring self preservation like taking experimental shots that use gene coding to instruct your cells to build proteins, in which none of the long term side effects are know? Nor is it known what all the coding of the MRNA instructs your cells to do. The biggest MRNA experimental covid gene shot maker, Pfizer, has been sued numerous times, including the biggest medical lawsuit in all of history, for lying to the gov and people about Pfizer’s own studies and uses of their products, and subsequently permanently harmed and killed many people. It’s several massive lawsuits, where Pfizer lied and people died, before covid even happened.

You mean lack of self preservation like taking an experimental shot in mass from a company who’s known to lie and allow their products to kill people for massive profits, when Pfizer can’t be directly sued if their covid gene shot hurts you, due to corrupted vaccine protections passed by our gov? Is that considered self preservation or a lack thereof?