Winners only.

[SlugButter]

He wasn't being called as a witness. He was not legally required to be at the hearing.
It may have been a dumb move for him to choose not to testify, but it may also have been the best move given his penchant for fvcking up his public speaking.

It’s not a legitimate court case for any type of crime. You’re big on evidence when asking others to back up a claim. Where’s the evidence?

 

[SlugButter]

It’s not a legitimate court case for any type of crime. You’re big on evidence when asking others to back up a claim. Where’s the evidence of a crime?

 

[SlugButter]

So Trump was only a witness in the trial and not a defendant?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I’m sure he was a vulgar dick. Usually when someone doesn’t show up to a legitimate court case there is a bench warrant put out and he is arrested. It’s called a failure to appear, which Im sure you know. If there was a shred of evidence that a male ***** a female, why is that warrant not already filed?

It was a civil case. As the defendant, he did not have to be there unless he was being called to testify.
There was no plan for him to be called to testify, so he did not break any law by choosing not to testify on his own behalf.
He did not fail to appear in the sense you are thinking.

 

[SlugButter]

It was a civil case. As the defendant, he did not have to be there unless he was being called to testify.
There was no plan for him to be called to testify, so he did not break any law by choosing not to testify on his own behalf.
Hid di not fail to appear in the sense you are thinking.

It’s a civil case because they have no evidence to bring a criminal case. Remember the lady who sued McDonald’s for hot coffee being spilled in her lap by herself? Seems a lot like a money thing. No evidence, but someone wants paid.

 

[SlugButter]

There was way more evidence in the McDonald’s hot coffee case than the Trump **** case I bet.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

It’s not a legitimate court case for any type of crime. You’re big on evidence when asking others to back up a claim. Where’s the evidence?

The evidence in any they said/they said case is most often in the testimony of the parties involved.
She told her side of the story. He COULD have told his side.
Once that is done, the jury gets to decide the plausibility of both sets of testimony and pass judgement.

First-hand or eyewitness testimony is just that: testimony. Evidence not necessary.

 

[SlugButter]

Where is this evidence by the way? Can Anyone on the entire internet e provide any? Since we are all worried about “misinformation” these days, maybe we should see some evidence on this one.

 

[SlugButter]

The evidence in any they said/they said case is most often in the testimony of the parties involved.
She told her side of the story. He COULD have told his side.
Once that is done, the jury gets to decide the plausibility of both sets of testimony and pass judgement.

First-hand or eyewitness testimony is just that: testimony. Evidence not necessary.

So you have no facts? Aren’t you big on knowing the facts for yourself? Since when is a rich white Americans word good enough for you?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

There was way more evidence in the McDonald’s hot coffee case than the Trump **** case I bet.

There was plenty of evidence in the coffee case. A fair amount was provided by McD's corporation.
The interesting thing about that one is they were offered a $20K settlement, They refused and chose a court hearing. She got awarded $3M

 

[SlugButter]

I used to think that republicans were the problem. Now I think it’s idiot liberals who have no core of belief that is the problem. We believe in the right things, but will get fooled into following idiots and tyrants who are using our goodness against us. It’s the religious tactic being used against us in real time and we don’t even see it, I’m so disappointed in the lack of deep thought in the modern liberal brain.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So you have no facts? Aren’t you big on knowing the facts for yourself? Since when is a rich white Americans word good enough for you?

I'm not a judge, nor a juror. I'm not an attorney. I don't make laws. I don't control the courts. I didn't write the Constitution.
I get to choose whether or not I will believe something with or without facts to back it up.

I also accept the way the legal system works, which is for a jury to be chosen to represent the public, since it is not feasible to have all US citizens make a decision in each and every court case.
The jurors made the decision based on the testimony they heard.
Would the decision have been different had Trump testified? Who knows?

Do you have firsthand knowledge of her testimony and reasons to believe the jury got it wrong?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Where is this evidence by the way? Can Anyone on the entire internet e provide any? Since we are all worried about “misinformation” these days, maybe we should see some evidence on this one.

What evidence?

 

[SlugButter]

I'm not a judge, nor a juror. I'm not an attorney. I don't make laws. I don't control the courts. I didn't write the Constitution.
I get to choose whether or not I will believe something with or without facts to back it up.

I also accept the way the legal system works, which is for a jury to be chosen to represent the public, since it is not feasible to have all US citizens make a decision in each and every court case.
The jurors made the decision based on the testimony they heard.
Would the decision have been different had Trump testified? Who knows?

Do you have firsthand knowledge of her testimony and reasons to believe the jury got it wrong?

This isn’t a criminal trial. Its just obviously a political takedown. I don’t like Trump either, but I just don’t see any actual evidence at all. I see a priveleged white liberal taking down a political enemy, and liberals all around me telling me evidence is the case itself. I don’t see that as evidence. It’s not like I’m ever voting for Trump or Biden anyway, so I guess maybe I’m not partisan enough anymore for this game.

 

[SlugButter]

What evidence?

My point exactly. You’ve convicted him of **** already in your mind. where’s your thought pattern to get to this point?