What is?

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

This seems to me more likely a recent definition in keeping with current events. I would be curious of the original definition.

I have no idea. When they use "they" as their (singular) pronoun it's confusing too. That seems to be part of their (plural) agenda - just create tons of confusion for everybody, confuse young kids into questioning their gender, etc. The create confusion tactic is working; people have literally gotten so confused they have forgotten there are good reasons behind why women don't generally compete against guys in athletics. People have forgotten there is a biological component to being a women.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I have no idea. When they use "they" as their (singular) pronoun it's confusing too. That seems to be part of their (plural) agenda - just create tons of confusion for everybody, confuse young kids into questioning their gender, etc. The create confusion tactic is working; people have literally gotten so confused they have forgotten there are good reasons behind why women don't generally compete against guys in athletics. People have forgotten there is a biological component to being a women.

No, I am with you.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Yeah, some interesting reading for sure. I am not sure I agree so much with the terminology of "*** assigned at birth". Being biologically male or female happens well before exiting the womb. Still reading.....

I agree "*** assigned at birth" doesn't strike me as accurate either. OTOH, I used to just be a "male." Now I'm a cisgender, binary, heterosexual male.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I agree "*** assigned at birth" doesn't strike me as accurate either. OTOH, I used to just be a "male." Now I'm a cisgender, binary, heterosexual male.

Not me...I'm still just a guy...I'm not playing into the nonsense...

And my preferred pronoun when asked is "fck off"

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I agree "*** assigned at birth" doesn't strike me as accurate either. OTOH, I used to just be a "male." Now I'm a cisgender, binary, heterosexual male.

I am a man. Tooth and nail. This fad don't scare me.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I am a man. Tooth and nail. This fad don't scare me.

IMHO you should definitely adopt cisgender, binary, heterosexual male. Man? What type of man? The type of man that plays on the women's team? A former woman who had some work done and is now "a man?" It's all very confusing. See how much more precise my "identifier" is? As a matter of fact I'm going modify it a little more for clarity's sake: Now I'm a cisgender, binary, heterosexual biological male with no medical or hormonal alterations. I think the cisgender/biological might be overkill, but better safe than sorry.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

IMHO you should definitely adopt cisgender, binary, heterosexual male. Man? What type of man? The type of man that plays on the women's team? A former woman who had some work done and is now "a man?" It's all very confusing. See how much more precise my "identifier" is? As a matter of fact I'm going modify it a little more for clarity's sake: Now I'm a cisgender, binary, heterosexual biological male with no medical or hormonal alterations. I think the cisgender/biological might be overkill, but better safe than sorry.

The Dude

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

The Most Dangerous International Treaty Ever Proposed ⋆ Brownstone Institute

The proposed new powers would cut across not only the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

brownstone.org

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

You do realize interviews are always edited and condensed??? Additionally, they didn't "censor" him, he can post on twitter or wherever else pleases. All ABC did was help him look less foolish than he actually is.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

All ABC did was help him look less foolish than he actually is.

Considering there's a lot of support for him to run on the dem pres ticket...they need to let him look however he does...

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

You do realize interviews are always edited and condensed??? Additionally, they didn't "censor" him, he can post on twitter or wherever else pleases. All ABC did was help him look less foolish than he actually is.

“We aren’t harming his message! We’re helping him!”

That’s some backwards logic, there. Can’t let free speech talk bad about big pharma! They basically own the tv news.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Considering there's a lot of support for him to run on the dem pres ticket...they need to let him look however he does...

IIRC, hasn't he been a vax "skeptic" all along??? As far as ABC him letting "look like himself" - maybe in perfect world, but isn't really up to the voters to spend a few hours researching the guy. IMHO, that's the problem with modern politics/voters - they hear what they want in a few snippets, don't research and ignore anything that "the other guys" say. That's how you end up with a Lauren Bobert in office - that woman couldn't think her way out of a paper bag, but she knows how to take shots at Liberals and post on Twitter . So there she is in Congress representing millions of Americans despite the fact that my 10 year old son is (literally) her intellectual superior. Hell my dog is her intellectual superior. I think I even have a plant that could outwit her.