Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
 

"Under the proposal, adults aged 18 to 56 without disabilities or dependents would need to work or participate in a job training program at least 20 hours a week to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps, for more than three months."


Frankly if you're not disabled and no dependents...get a fckn job...
“Proposal”? This is the ABAWD rules that have been in okay for decades.

They get waived in economic emergencies, but otherwise, very old news.

Able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs) can get SNAP for only three months in a 3-year period if they do not meet certain extra work requirements. This is called the ABAWD time limit.
The law allows states to ask FNS to temporarily waive the ABAWD time limit based on evidence showing that an area has an unemployment rate of over 10 percent or does not have a sufficient number of jobs. An ABAWD time limit waiver does not waive the general SNAP work requirements.
 
Last edited:
“Proposal”? This is the ABAWD rules that have been in okay for decades.

They get waived in economic emergencies, but otherwise, very old news.

Able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs) can get SNAP for only three months in a 3-year period if they do not meet certain extra work requirements. This is called the ABAWD time limit.
The law allows states to ask FNS to temporarily waive the ABAWD time limit based on evidence showing that an area has an unemployment rate of over 10 percent or does not have a sufficient number of jobs. An ABAWD time limit waiver does not waive the general SNAP work requirements.
I get that it's basic stuff...but it's upping the age to 56 from 50 that's being held up as an evil thing in the debt limit bill...
 
I get that it's basic stuff...but it's upping the age to 56 from 50 that's being held up as an evil thing in the debt limit bill...
With retirement ages and life expectancy increasing, 6 years is not unreasonable. It’s interesting however, that a group considered to be anti-higher-minimum-wage is wanting to make a move to reduce welfare use.

What better way to reduce welfare use than to have people earning enough money to eat?
 
There are many ways to view this and yes he was an adult and was told the risks before the procedure. So my body my choice has its pro and cons…

IMHO, alot of the issue is the mental health experts in the US and around the world just ****. It seems far more logical to help these young boys and girls cope with the fact they're not happy with their bodies and/or that they aren't hetrosexual than to turn it into a medical problem. It's seems like they're just passing the buck to the docs who have to figure out how to "reconstruct" :rolleyes: the missing parts, remove the extra parts, how to suppress your hormones and how much of the opposite gender hormones to put you on, if and when to block puberty, etc, etc, etc.

I have a feeling alot of these transgender folks are what we used to call effeminate or artists or bull dykes, etc. Would they have been happier if they were born the opposite *** - maybe, probably. OTOH are they really going to be happier if they convert their existing bodies into some sort of gender defying hybrid body where they are forever dependent on surgeons and hormone therapy?
 
Last edited:


‘From the 1920s onwards, the Nazi Party targeted German youth as a special audience for its propaganda messages. These messages emphasized that the Party was a movement of youth: dynamic, resilient, forward-looking, and hopeful. Millions of German young people were won over to Nazism in the classroom and through extracurricular activities…’

 


‘From the 1920s onwards, the Nazi Party targeted German youth as a special audience for its propaganda messages. These messages emphasized that the Party was a movement of youth: dynamic, resilient, forward-looking, and hopeful. Millions of German young people were won over to Nazism in the classroom and through extracurricular activities…’


The old lets compare the other guys to the nazi party tactic - never gets old does it?
 
7jcos5.jpg
 
I'm convinced. Since all athletic competition is based on biological advantages, I say we do away with all gender based divisions in sports. I guess Title ix has to be struck or rewritten; I suggest we just offer the athletic scholarships to girls in other categories - academic, etc. I feel so much more woke now.

https://www.outkick.com/*****-swimm...al-advantages-while-defending-*****-athletes/
 
They totally screwed up the headline - the words are in the wrong order and there is no reason for a question mark.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,107,731
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top