What is?

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Yes. You are talking averages. American males are on average taller than Asians.
Yet in some strange happenstance, Asians play pro basketball on US teams.

They are outliers, yet they manage to exist.

How does that have anything to do with pretend women competing in women's sports?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

How does that have anything to do with pretend women competing in women's sports?

It has to do with having people of similar abilities competing with each other instead of worrying about whether they have or had a d*ck or a p*ssy.

Are you so fvcking thick that you don’t get it, or just refusing to accept it so you can hang on to your feelings with every ounce of strength you have ?

Christ, you’re as bad as Thxone who is still insisting bones don’t have nerves in them.
Willfully ignorant.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

It has to do with having people of similar abilities competing with each other instead of worrying about whether they have or had a d*ck or a p*ssy.

Are you so fvcking thick that you don’t get it, or just refusing to accept it so you can hang on to your feelings with every ounce of strength you have ?

Christ, you’re as bad as Thxone who is still insisting bones don’t have nerves in them.
Willfully ignorant.

You're just fckn stupid...I thought you an just toeing the party line with ***** athlete stuff...but you are just fckn stupid

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You're just fckn stupid...I thought you an just toeing the party line with ***** athlete stuff...but you are just fckn stupid

Strong argument there. “I’ve got no facts to back up what I say, but you’re stupid.”

Compelling, and rich

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Strong argument there. “I’ve got no facts to back up what I say, but you’re stupid.”

Compelling, and rich

It ain't my fault you don't comprehend the differences between men and women...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

It has to do with having people of similar abilities competing with each other instead of worrying about whether they have or had a d*ck or a p*ssy.

Except you are using ethnic background in your example. Not the same as ***.

Are you so fvcking thick that you don’t get it, or just refusing to accept it so you can hang on to your feelings with every ounce of strength you have ?

Seems like that is exactly what you do Rob.

Christ, you’re as bad as Thxone who is still insisting bones don’t have nerves in them.
Willfully ignorant.

Define in as you are using it.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

It ain't my fault you don't comprehend the differences between men and women...

It ain't my fault you think two people who can both lift a maximum of 300 pounds have different lifting ability. Or two people who can both high jump a maximum of 6 feet have different jumping ability.

I'll assume your 1,500 watt RMS @ 2 ohm amp is more powerful than Steve's 1,500 watt RMS @ 2 ohm amp.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Except you are using ethnic background in your example. Not the same as ***.

And why is that?

Seems like that is exactly what you do Rob.

Ahhh, says the guy who does everything by opinion and feelings, yet complains when people question his opinions and feelings while also accusing people of acting by their opinions and feelings.
Try to at least keep your lies straight.

Define in as you are using it.

I'm using it the exact same way that it is used by the likes of Gray's Anatomy, and every other medical reference that exists. Unlike you, I don't make up my own definitions for words in order to backpedal, cover my errors, or try to be right when I am wrong.

in-expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else.
in-that is located inside or within
in-located or situated within; inner; internal
in-inside a container, place, or area, or surrounded or closed off by something
in- used to indicate location or position within something

So, tell us all how the medical profession has been using the word "in" improperly when they describe nerves as "in" bone.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Complaining that opinions are not accepted as facts:

Calling the use of verifiable facts feelings (and implying feelings are the wrong thing):

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

It has to do with having people of similar abilities competing with each other instead of worrying about whether they have or had a d*ck or a p*ssy.

Are you so fvcking thick that you don’t get it, or just refusing to accept it so you can hang on to your feelings with every ounce of strength you have ?

Christ, you’re as bad as Thxone who is still insisting bones don’t have nerves in them.
Willfully ignorant.

We're not worried about them having an innie or an outie. We are worried about an inherent gender advantage. Keep in mind for a male to undergo gender affirming surgery, they have to go thru the puberty process.

This isn't some stuff a bunch of neoconservative rednecks came up with while drinking moonshine around the campfire because "***** is bad." Splitting women and men up for athletic competition dates back to (at least) 6th century BC, when the ancient Greeks had the Heraean Games as the female counterpart to the Olympics. I see it 4 days a week at my kiddo's soccer practice/games - the same age/size girls just don't have the speed, strength, level of coordination, reflexs, reaction time and aggressiveness the boys display. It's not even close.

As I've said before what this comes down is there a small minority that wants the rest of the world to accept them as 110% women, when in reality they're more like 60/40% women. These poor folks that believe they are trapped in the wrong body have my sympathy. However, they ultimately need to accept that regardless of surgeries, regardless of hormone treatments, they still got the wrong body and that comes with some consequences.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

It ain't my fault you think two people who can both lift a maximum of 300 pounds have different lifting ability. Or two people who can both high jump a maximum of 6 feet have different jumping ability.

I'll assume your 1,500 watt RMS @ 2 ohm amp is more powerful than Steve's 1,500 watt RMS @ 2 ohm amp.

But we can't have a "who can lift 300lbs but no more" class for power lifters and obviously some people would cheat. And what happens if somebody in the 300 class lifts 310? Are we going to split up Olympians by, these are the people that jumped 6ft, these are the people who jumped 5'10", these are the people that jumped 5'8"... I don't see that making for very compelling sport, not to mention such a system would inevitably have the effect of pushing women out of sports because as has been noted, men have a genetic/gender advantage over the ladies. As a person that supports female athletics, the "Rob" system wouldn't set women's athletics back, it would destroy women's athletics.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So if this dude cut off his junk and claimed to be a woman, there is no way we should ever let him compete in women's sports.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

So if this dude cut off his junk and claimed to be a woman, there is no way we should ever let him compete in women's sports.

View attachment 48503

Well he did compete at pretty high level in college football.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

And why is that?

Because they are different. Just as male and female are different. Not the same.

Ahhh, says the guy who does everything by opinion and feelings, yet complains when people question his opinions and feelings while also accusing people of acting by their opinions and feelings.
Try to at least keep your lies straight.

This is what page in the liberal playbook of responses? You use it often.

I'm using it the exact same way that it is used by the likes of Gray's Anatomy, and every other medical reference that exists. Unlike you, I don't make up my own definitions for words in order to backpedal, cover my errors, or try to be right when I am wrong.

I ask how YOU were using it. Good job following instructions.

in-expressing the situation of something that is or appears to be enclosed or surrounded by something else.
in-that is located inside or within
in-located or situated within; inner; internal
in-inside a container, place, or area, or surrounded or closed off by something
in- used to indicate location or position within something

So, tell us all how the medical profession has been using the word "in" improperly when they describe nerves as "in" bone.

So you spend all this time arguing when you could have led with this. This is LITERALLY how I have been using the word through. IN/THROUGH. Not IN as part of/attached.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Because they are different. Just as male and female are different. Not the same.

Can a woman be the VP of a company? President? Fly a plane? Fight in war?

This is what page in the liberal playbook of responses? You use it often.

Ahhh, the old liberal playbook of keeping feelings for things like your favorite flavor of ice cream, and facts for things like economic studies and the discussion thereof.
Good thing the the phone you are typing on was designed with facts instead of feelings, huh?
IOW, put your feelings in your left hand, and take a shit in your right hand. See which one fills up first.

I ask how YOU were using it. Good job following instructions.

Poor job at comprehension, dickweed, I told you EXACLTY how *I* am using it; you just failed to comprehend. As usual: "I'm using it the exact same way that it is used by the likes of Gray's Anatomy, and every other medical reference that exists."

So you spend all this time arguing when you could have led with this. This is LITERALLY how I have been using the word through. IN/THROUGH. Not IN as part of/attached.

You have denied dozens of times that bones have nerves in them. You even used the example of the hardware being removed from your finger by the ex-Jacksonville Jaguars doctor as proof that there are no nerves in bone. Then you try to tapdance away from your mistake with this whole "through, not in" nonsense.
And you screw up your own argument by using the tunnel analogy and saying a car is in as it is passing through.
At least try to be consistent with your arguments, even if they are wrong.