Winners only.

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Lula Backs BRICS Currency to Replace Dollar in Foreign Trade

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Our nation is rotting

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I couldn’t care less, TBH. But I think it should be classified by metrics other than a pr*ck or a p*ssy.

They manage to break boxers and wrestlers into weight classes for “fairness”, but can’t figure out how to put people into classes for other sports?

‘Seems to me that the people running the show might be a bunch of fvcking idiots.

Tell me: when you see a ***** person, do you run home and start flagellating yourself with a belt? Do you feel physical pain? Does your income go down? Does your TV stop working?

What exactly happens to YOUR existence when you see a ***** person?

I honestly idgaf about the ***** thing in general...I'm absolutely against biological males competing against women...there is nothing fair in that competition...if biological men want to compete as ***** "women" either compete against other biological males or push for the own leagues and competitions...but I guess that makes me a bigot right...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Do averages simplify math?

Can averages be used nefariously?

These are questions for you. I know the answer is YES for both. For some reason your brain wont let you answer the questions. Is it because I know the answers are yes and you wouldn't dare agree with a Trump supporter? What is holding you back from simply saying yes? Pride? Ego? Arrogance? Stupidity? A diick in the old pie hole? You tell me.

The answers are yes.
Are those the ONLY things they are for? The answer is NO, even though you claimed it.
Remember when you made that claim? I sure do.

If you forget your claim, it’s part of my signature line.

Do you make so many incorrect claims because you are a Trump supporter?
Do you insist your incorrect claims are correct, even in face of irrefutable fact that proves them wrong, because you are a Trump supporter?
Is lying a thing that Trump supporters like to do?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The answers are yes.

About time.

Are those the ONLY things they are for? The answer is NO, even though you claimed it.
Remember when you made that claim? I sure do.

It's my opinion and as such should not bother you. Why you choose to take my opinions personal is a problem you need to work on.

If you forget your claim, it’s part of my signature line.

I know what I said. My opinions are based on the fact that the answers are yes. I am allowed to do that just as you are allowed to see it differently.

Do you make so many incorrect claims because you are a Trump supporter?

Irrelevant.

Do you insist your incorrect claims are correct, even in face of irrefutable fact that proves them wrong, because you are a Trump supporter?

Irrelevant.

Is lying a thing that Trump supporters like to do?

Lying is a human trait. You lie, I lie, we all lie.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I honestly idgaf about the ***** thing in general...I'm absolutely against biological males competing against women...there is nothing fair in that competition...if biological men want to compete as ***** "women" either compete against other biological males or push for the own leagues and competitions...but I guess that makes me a bigot right...

Martina Navratilova had a great solution. Create an "Open" category where gender isn't a consideration. The problem is we're being big meanies by not considering a dude who went thru puberty and then had his johnson converted into a mrs johnson a female by not allowing them to compete with females. Talk about the tyranny of the minority.

I'm not an unsympathetic person. If you're a "woman" trapped in a man's body, good luck to you because that has $uck giant donkey balls. Need to use the woman's bathroom, I can deal with that. Want me to start calling Sally instead of Sam, I'll be happy to comply. But I don't see how pretending that somebody who has reverse gendered their body to be a facsimile of a woman's body is actually 100% woman helps them. I don't see how psychiatrists can possibly think allowing/encouraging people to pretend they are something they are not is healthier than helping them come to grips with the fact that they are what they are. If I went to a psychiatrists and told them I identify as Ryan Reynolds and I want drive his Lambo around town and Disney needs to send me the script to Deadpool 3, the psychiatrist (hopefully) would help me cope with reality.

Maybe @Buck is onto something. Maybe all this "I identify as" crap is to create a society where people will voluntarily plug themselves into The Matrix and live out whatever life they want to live. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me, but former guys playing women's sports doesn't make a lot of sense either.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

If this woke, then I'm going back to bed.

University "professor" claims there is no BIOLOGICAL gender

The internet is in chaos after an alleged professor claims that there is no such thing as biological gender, as many tend to believe the contrary. Conservatives

theindependent.co

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

About time.

It's my opinion and as such should not bother you. Why you choose to take my opinions personal is a problem you need to work on.

Odd, since you are the one often whining that people live by their feelings.
More of your “do as I say, not as I do” entitled mentality.

I know what I said. My opinions are based on the fact that the answers are yes. I am allowed to do that just as you are allowed to see it differently.

OK. So those things CAN be a truth, therefore they are the ONLY truth per you.
Pretty warped thought process.

Irrelevant.

Irrelevant.

Lying is a human trait. You lie, I lie, we all lie.

You do it an awful lot.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I honestly idgaf about the ***** thing in general...I'm absolutely against biological males competing against women...there is nothing fair in that competition...if biological men want to compete as ***** "women" either compete against other biological males or push for the own leagues and competitions...but I guess that makes me a bigot right...

If a man and a woman can both bench press the same max weight, run the same speed, throw a javelin the same distance, jump the same height, would a competition between them be unfair because one has a pen*s, and one has a vag*na?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

If a man and a woman can both bench press the same max weight, run the same speed, throw a javelin the same distance, jump the same height, would a competition between them be unfair because one has a pen*s, and one has a vag*na?

No, unless the competition was say a game of chess where (obviously) the man would have a substantial advantage.

Seriously, we're talking about sports where we divide women from men and for good reason. Real women are getting crushed in competitions that they would have won if it weren't for a "unreal" woman entering the competition. Simply put, I don't think it's fair for "biological females" to compete against a "surgically/hormonally modified" humans. If they want to compete on co-ed teams, that's fine. Maybe Nike should sponsor "anything but cisgender" leagues instead of sponsoring Dylan Mulvaney. Bud Light could be the official beer of the LGBTQxyz leagues. Numerous big companies seem to be on the woke wagon, so they shouldn't be lacking for sponsors.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Smart move by the Biden administration. It's a lose, lose, lose for the GOP. If the USSC intervenes on behalf of the drug, then obviously huge loss for the GOP, but that seems highly unlikely. If the USSC intervenes at all it seems more likely they'll make the ban the law of the land - another loser for the GOP. If the USSC chooses to take a pass, then they're setting the precedent than any biased Federal Judge in any old state can in essence make Federal laws. Go GOP!!!

DOJ will ask Supreme Court to intervene in abortion pill case after ruling partially blocks access

Judges blocked mail delivery of the abortion pill mifepristone, reimposed doctor visits and shortened the length of time it can be used during pregnancy.

www.cnbc.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

No, unless the competition was say a game of chess where (obviously) the man would have a substantial advantage.

Seriously, we're talking about sports where we divide women from men and for good reason. Real women are getting crushed in competitions that they would have won if it weren't for a "unreal" woman entering the competition. Simply put, I don't think it's fair for "biological females" to compete against a "surgically/hormonally modified" humans. If they want to compete on co-ed teams, that's fine. Maybe Nike should sponsor "anything but cisgender" leagues instead of sponsoring Dylan Mulvaney. Bud Light could be the official beer of the LGBTQxyz leagues. Numerous big companies seem to be on the woke wagon, so they shouldn't be lacking for sponsors.

Agreed, and that's why if it's a concern, they should separate based on physical capability, and not genitalia.
Kevin Hart is a man. Put him up against a player from the WNBA in a little one-on-one. He is the obvious victor because he is a man playing against a woman. And they are weak.

A ridiculous hypothetical, but it really does speak to reality. If we're worried about ***** men having an advantage, then they should be excluded based on their bodies. Not the fact they HAD a d*ck, but the fact that they are 5" taller, 25lbs heavier than every other player.

Create limits. Make sure that there are at least X number of women on a team who are bigger than the ***** player. If the women are bigger, there is no advantage for the one who used to be a physical male.
Similarly, if there are biological women who fall well outside of the "norm" of women, they do not get to play because they have an unfair advantage.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Agreed, and that's why if it's a concern, they should separate based on physical capability, and not genitalia.
Kevin Hart is a man. Put him up against a player from the WNBA in a little one-on-one. He is the obvious victor because he is a man playing against a woman. And they are weak.

A ridiculous hypothetical, but it really does speak to reality. If we're worried about ***** men having an advantage, then they should be excluded based on their bodies. Not the fact they HAD a d*ck, but the fact that they are 5" taller, 25lbs heavier than every other player.

Create limits. Make sure that there are at least X number of women on a team who are bigger than the ***** player. If the women are bigger, there is no advantage for the one who used to be a physical male.
Similarly, if there are biological women who fall well outside of the "norm" of women, they do not get to play because they have an unfair advantage.

Men have greater muscle mass, faster reaction times and are just plain more athletic. And now that medically engineered unmales are competiting in women's sports we're seeing the advantGe play out in the field.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Odd, since you are the one often whining that people live by their feelings.
More of your “do as I say, not as I do” entitled mentality.

Funny, I only see you hurling these accusations.

OK. So those things CAN be a truth, therefore they are the ONLY truth per you.
Pretty warped thought process.

Right and if they can be truth and I choose to use the truth part of them in my opinions then how am I wrong? Or am I wrong because you don't agree with my view?

You do it an awful lot.

No, you claim I do it a lot. Just because you make the claim does not make it true. We don't know you so why do any of us here need to just accept that you know all and that you are telling the truth about anything?