Winners only.

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Proof the fix was always in. Even with a USSC dominated by "conservatives," they refuse to even hear the case. It would be one thing if they heard the case and decided against Trump, but they wouldn't even hear the case. Soros probably told them to take a pass on the case.

MSN

www.msn.com

SCOTUS has been taken over by lizard people who are Democrats. They are funded by hospitals who got bonuses for killing people and claiming it was COVID.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Sure can. What I won’t do is accept “because I said so” from someone as a proof that I am wrong.

I also won’t accept it as proof they are right.

Or accept a spelling error without going full conspiracy theory about it

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So are you switching topics or just information? Moving goalpost or just spinning things?

Information. You posted the definition of bridge, but then created your own definition of it.
If a bridge connects two separated things, how can you say that two things that are touching each other are bridged?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

We discussed the whole rhetorical question thing long ago, yet you seem again to not understand it.
For such a smart guy, you seem to not know a lot.

You are making statements under the guise of rhetoric when you could just make the statement.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Or accept a spelling error without going full conspiracy theory about it

Fine. You time-traveled and quoted an error that I corrected.
At 3:35, you went back to 3:31 and quoted a post that was corrected at 3:32.

Happy?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Information. You posted the definition of bridge, but then created your own definition of it.
If a bridge connects two separated things, how can you say that two things that are touching each other are bridged?

Yup... just as I thought. Now you will turn full smart asss.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Fine. You time-traveled and quoted an error that I corrected.
At 3:35, you went back to 3:31 and quoted a post that was corrected at 3:32.

Happy?

You are unbelievable.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Yup... just as I thought. Now you will turn full smart asss.

Stop deflecting. Answer the question.
If a bridge is something that joins two things, how can two things that are directly joined be “bridged”?
Specifically, how can you consider two wires that are touching each other as having a “bridge”?
If they are soldered together, why would you not say “spliced”?

YOU are the one so often arguing your words are misconstrued, taken literally when you want them interpreted or vice versa, or not comprehended.
If you feel words are such a problem, wouldn’t it make sense to speak as accurately as possible?
Wouldn’t it make sense to use the words that are appropriate for the context you are trying to convey?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

For all you folks that Thxone thinks are too dumb to understand the words I use:
“lest - with the intention of preventing (something undesirable); to avoid the risk of.”

Do you think the other people on this forum are too dumb to understand that you are yet again speaking for me?

I bet you smell like unwashed fat guy balls.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Stop deflecting. Answer the question.
If a bridge is something that joins two things, how can two things that are directly joined be “bridged”?
Specifically, how can you consider two wires that are touching each other as having a “bridge”?
If they are soldered together, why would you not say “spliced”?

YOU are the one so often arguing your words are misconstrued, taken literally when you want them interpreted or vice versa, or not comprehended.
If you feel words are such a problem, wouldn’t it make sense to speak as accurately as possible?
Wouldn’t it make sense to use the words that are appropriate for the context you are trying to convey?

At least we know why you need everyone to be literal. You are too stupid to comprehend anything.

Also, it's nobody else's job to cater to you and help you understand people.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Fine. You time-traveled and quoted an error that I corrected.
At 3:35, you went back to 3:31 and quoted a post that was corrected at 3:32.

Happy?

Or I quoted it and had to do something before making the post...but yeah time travel is way more likely...

Just can't accept making a spelling error...

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

You are unbelievable.

Shim is believable when you realize zi is an idiot.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Do you think the other people on this forum are too dumb to understand that you are yet again speaking for me?

I bet you smell like unwashed fat guy balls.

You suggested that while YOU understood my words, others here did not. That means you think they are not as intelligent as you.
I know YOU understood, but I didn’t want them to be confused, as unintelligent can often be.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Whoa now...shim figured out that I developed time travel technology to go 3 minutes back in time to make of his spelling...zi is a frigging genius

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

It’s pretty funny how you knothead snowflakes can do little more than deflect when you are wrong.

I’ll ask all three of you (since you seem to be the human centipede in this discussion): Show me where anyone with any decent knowledge of audio and electronics has correctly referred to spliced wires in an enclosure as “bridged internally”.
Show me where a monoblock amp circuit has more than one “output”.

I’ll wait.