Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I understand. That's why I was specific to Rob about the terminals themselves and not bridging the amplifier channels. He chooses to ignore 99.4% of what I say so he can argue. He could have easily said "I prefer to call it _____________ when speaking about speaker output terminals." But that's not his agenda. He wants to argue. It's fine. I am fine talking about something else anyway.

Brother, you can voice your opinions with me all you like. I have no problem understanding the majority of your post.
You prefer to say “in” has a different meaning when YOU are describing your theory that there are no nerves in bones.

Sorry, but that’s not how language works. When discussing car audio and electrical circuits in general, “bridge” and “output” have very specific meanings and usage. Just because YOU want to arbitrarily assign the words other meanings does not make you correct.
 
Keep failing, dummy. No one in the audio world would ever say two wires connected together are “bridged” unless they wanted to look like a fvcking dope.
No one who has a clue thinks a terminal bus creates multiple “outputs” from a mono amp.
Show me one example of anyone in electronics or electrical engineering saying they “bridged” two wires when connecting them together.

Look up “bridge” when used in terms of electronics. I’ll give examples that you will say are fake, so search them yourself:
View attachment 47442


View attachment 47443
Here we go again. Look, just admit that you ignore post so you can argue. Just admit it because I posted words and meanings as well with synonyms. You are ignoring them and choosing to use the word in a way that fits your argument. For the last time, nobody except you is talking about bridging the amplifier.
 
You prefer to say “in” has a different meaning when YOU are describing your theory that there are no nerves in bones.

Sorry, but that’s not how language works. When discussing car audio and electrical circuits in general, “bridge” and “output” have very specific meanings and usage. Just because YOU want to arbitrarily assign the words other meanings does not make you correct.
It seems to work fine when you want words to support your arguments and while we are on the subject, show me the RULES that says you have to use words ONE WAY when talking about a given topic. I will wait.

Furthermore, I am not "assigning" other meanings, they are already there. It is MY choice how I use them. If you truly are educated like you claim to be you would have no problem with comprehending. Alas, here you are, arguing that your choice of meanings or use is the only correct one.
 
Here is a picture of something that should clear this up... but it won't because Rob will deny it or ignore it.

This is made by Phoenix Connect. They make this. They call it a BRIDGE CONNECTION. The terminals of my mono amplifier will be connected inside the amplifier like the wire bridge seen here. The only difference is they are using wires whereas the amp is using traces on a circuit board. Literally the same circuit.

I encourage people to expand their vocabulary and ways of thinking. Remember, just because you haven't heard of it doesn't make it not true. Rob, this is the proof of a company using the phrase "bridge". You asked, I provided. Rob, are you wearing your pointe shoes?

Phoenix-Contact.jpg
 
Too bad it was a Christian school vs a "regular" school. Set's up the Christian vs LGBTQxyz narrative. Nevertheless I support the girls. Girls shouldn't have to compete against biological males in sports.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/c...d=hpmsn&cvid=d9c04660f79144de80513b31960514fd
 
So Asian aren’t considered POC? minority? Useful tool for the dnc
View attachment 47452
Racial equality?

Here is a chart representative of these United States and the population therein. In order to make things "racially equal" there is going to have to be some MAJOR racial oppression.

Why is this country targeting white people like it is? Unless the goal of this government is to turn the United States into a 3rd world country so they can more easily control it and make more money off its people it doesn't make sense.

Chart.jpg
 
Why is this country targeting white people like it is?
Marxism. Using the identity freaks to hate the biggest population in the US so it destroys the country. Anti white racism has been green lit because people want America to be destroyed as it is. It’s all part of old school playbooks for ruining a nation, like China would like to do for us.
 
Marxism. Using the identity freaks to hate the biggest population in the US so it destroys the country. Anti white racism has been green lit because people want America to be destroyed as it is. It’s all part of old school playbooks for ruining a nation, like China would like to do for us.

Not Marxism. Even the so-called marxist countries are no where near marxism.

IMHO, it's just the whole everybody needs somebody/something to hate, somebody to blame for all the world's ills, etc. Some people blame blacks, some blame the Jews, some blame liberals, some blame TV, etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,116,369
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top