Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Go eat a diick" and other weak ad hominem that you spew endlessly is not an "opinion", kid. It's a childish outburst by a triggered snowflake.
In your case, it occurs whenever you are proved wrong and have no argument to offer, or when you are asked to support your argument and are unable.

Big difference.
Ya think? A snowflake? What is a snowflake in the context you are using because I think it would fit someone like yourself better. I don't have a problem with people having their own opinions and have stated several times it is a good thing. YOU get triggered when other people voice their opinions so here you go...

""Snowflake" is a derogatory slang term for a person, implying that they have an inflated sense of uniqueness, an unwarranted sense of entitlement, or are overly-emotional, easily offended, and unable to deal with opposing opinions."
 
I hope people are paying attention because if he is willing to do this then he is well past giving a shit and there is NO REASON anyone should believe a word Putin has to say. He is not interested in peace of any kind.

He's interested in reassembling (to whatever extent he can) the old USSR. I know it sounds sadistic, but the Ukrainian war is an excellent opportunity to bleed Putin dry and we should take the opportunity while it's still there.
 
He's interested in reassembling (to whatever extent he can) the old USSR. I know it sounds sadistic, but the Ukrainian war is an excellent opportunity to bleed Putin dry and we should take the opportunity while it's still there.
Or... "someone" could take him out. Clean and quiet like. The headline "Putin suffers massive heart attack". That kind of C.I.A. thing.
 
Don't they get it; no election is legitimate. All elections are the result of the Cabal's meddling. The only reason DeSantis was "appointed" gov of Florida is so he can mount a credible campaign against Trump; thereby weakening Trump, ******* up Trump's campaign resources, etc, etc, etc. The Cabal will go to any lengths to compromise their most formidable enemy (Trump).

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...A15CWgU?cvid=8738964cfa11403db5fed62ae5d5af5b
 
Ya think? A snowflake? What is a snowflake in the context you are using because I think it would fit someone like yourself better. I don't have a problem with people having their own opinions and have stated several times it is a good thing. YOU get triggered when other people voice their opinions so here you go...

""Snowflake" is a derogatory slang term for a person, implying that they have an inflated sense of uniqueness, an unwarranted sense of entitlement, or are overly-emotional, easily offended, and unable to deal with opposing opinions."
There are billions upon billions of people on the planet. Uniqueness went out the window long ago.
The rest of the definition applies to you. Your are entitled with your “because I said so” method of debate, and the way you think your personal experience represents everyone’s, your total disregard for the future generations, etc.
You are overly emotional and easily offended as evidenced by your namecalling and other attempts at personal attack every single time you fail at an argument. Offended by facts, no less.
You consider feelings and opinions as facts, and freak out over them. You deny them. You complain that people just “use others’ facts” instead of finding their own. You make up your own “facts” that you somehow think refute established facts and empirical evidence.

You fit the definition that you provided, almost to the letter.
Good job!
 
There are billions upon billions of people on the planet. Uniqueness went out the window long ago.
The rest of the definition applies to you. Your are entitled with your “because I said so” method of debate, and the way you think your personal experience represents everyone’s, your total disregard for the future generations, etc.
You are overly emotional and easily offended as evidenced by your namecalling and other attempts at personal attack every single time you fail at an argument. Offended by facts, no less.
You consider feelings and opinions as facts, and freak out over them. You deny them. You complain that people just “use others’ facts” instead of finding their own. You make up your own “facts” that you somehow think refute established facts and empirical evidence.

You fit the definition that you provided, almost to the letter.
Good job!
It's responses like this that are the reasons I call you names, insult you or generally blow you off. Pure ignorance. That's all your response is. When I respond to YOUR ignorance you come back with your standard labels of me.

"Because I said so" - This is literally from your head, made up by you and I am sure you say it to other people. It's just one of your go to phrases.

"My personal experiences" - When I speak about MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCES it is because I experienced them so I have FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE.

"Overly Emotional" - You have no idea what my emotional state is. Period. If you think you do it's because you are ignorant and arrogant.

"Offended" - By what? By you? Don't flatter yourself. I have never been offended by text on a website forum let alone by an internet troll such as yourself.

"You consider feelings and opinions as facts" - Another one of your go to phrases based on ignorance.

"Complain" - Responding and engaging in the conversation is not by default "complaining".

"Using others facts" - Tell us professor... what facts have you come up with on your own?

Diick eater - Merry Christmas... or in your case, Happy Holidays.
 
It's responses like this that are the reasons I call you names, insult you or generally blow you off. Pure ignorance. That's all your response is. When I respond to YOUR ignorance you come back with your standard labels of me.

"Because I said so" - This is literally from your head, made up by you and I am sure you say it to other people. It's just one of your go to phrases.

No. You’ve demonstrated it many times, but have also actually posted the words. When you say you don’t need to provide facts in order to verify your claims, and tell the questioner to go find the proof themselves, it’s a “because I said so” claim.

"My personal experiences" - When I speak about MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCES it is because I experienced them so I have FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE.

Yes. But when you act like your personal experiences represent the nation or world, it shows egocentricity. Kind of like the guy who said there is no global warming because he experienced a day of cooler temps.

"Overly Emotional" - You have no idea what my emotional state is. Period. If you think you do it's because you are ignorant and arrogant.

You show your emotional state with so many of your posts, I couldn’t even count them all. Every ad hominem freak-out is a clear indicator.

"Offended " - By what? By you? Don't flatter yourself. I have never been offended by text on a website forum let alone by an internet troll such as yourself.

If you don’t get offended by having your BS called on, why do you get so triggered when it happens? Coincidence?

"You consider feelings and opinions as facts" - Another one of your go to phrases based on ignorance.

A recent example: you feel and opine that bones do not have nerves in them. You have literally made dozens of posts in support of what you consider as fact, in spite of an almost equal number of posts proving you wrong with facts and evidence.

"Complain" - Responding and engaging in the conversation is not by default "complaining".

You have complained probably dozens of times about the price of gas, and life in general. Remember you complained about Biden using the SPR, or COVID for “making you work”?

"Using others facts" - Tell us professor... what facts have you come up with on your own?

Do you have any idea how ridiculous that argument is? I’m not an explorer, I’m not a scientist, I’m not an economist. Does that mean I can’t utilize the facts those people discovered?
Did you build the laptop or phone you post with? Did you discover ohms law that you seem not to understand, but affects your use of electronics dramatically? Did you discover how to turn crude oil into gasoline?
But you could still reference facts about them, right?
What schools did you go to where you had to rediscover all facts you used to write a term paper, do math problems, wrote a book report?


Diick eater - Merry Christmas... or in your case, Happy Holidays.

Happy Holidays. Putz. lol
 
Last edited:
It's responses like this that are the reasons I call you names, insult you or generally blow you off. Pure ignorance. That's all your response is. When I respond to YOUR ignorance you come back with your standard labels of me.

"Because I said so" - This is literally from your head, made up by you and I am sure you say it to other people. It's just one of your go to phrases.

No. You’ve demonstrated it many times, but have also actually posted the words. When you say you don’t need to provide facts in order to verify your claims, and tell the questioner to go find the proof themselves, it’s a “because I said so” claim.

"My personal experiences" - When I speak about MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCES it is because I experienced them so I have FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE.

Yes. But when you act like your personal experiences represent the nation or world, it shows egocentricity. Kind of like the guy who said there is no global warming because he experienced a day of cooler temps.

"Overly Emotional" - You have no idea what my emotional state is. Period. If you think you do it's because you are ignorant and arrogant.

You show your emotional state with so many of your posts, I couldn’t even count them all. Every ad hominem freak-out is a clear indicator.

"Offended" - By what? By you? Don't flatter yourself. I have never been offended by text on a website forum let alone by an internet troll such as yourself.

If you don’t get offended by having your BS called on, why do you get so triggered when it happens? Coincidence?

"You consider feelings and opinions as facts" - Another one of your go to phrases based on ignorance.

A recent example: you feel and opine that bones do not have nerves in them. You have literally made dozens of posts in support of what you consider as fact, in spite of an almost equal number of posts proving you wrong.

"Complain" - Responding and engaging in the conversation is not by default "complaining".

You have complained probably dozens of times about the price of gas, and life in general. Remember you complained about Biden using the SPR, or COVID for “making you work”?

"Using others facts" - Tell us professor... what facts have you come up with on your own?

Do you have any idea how ridiculous that argument is? I’m not an explorer, I’m not a scientist, I’m not an economist. Does that mean I can’t utilize the facts those people discovered?
Did you build the laptop or phone you post with? Did you discover ohms law that you seem not to understand, but affects your use of electronics dramatically? Did you discover how to turn crude oil into gasoline?
But you could still reference facts about them, right?
What schools did you go to where you had to rediscover all facts you used to write a term paper, do math problems, wrote a book report?

Diick eater - Merry Christmas... or in your case, Happy Holidays.

Happy Holidays. Putz. lol
What you are doing and continue to do is respond with your own feelings to what I say. Don't act like it is what I think or how I feel when YOU are the one making the claim. You assume I respond in whatever way I respond because of the way YOU assume I feel. You should stop doing that. I could tell you to eat diicks with no emotions what so ever because I have chosen to identify you as a diick eater. Mainly by the way you respond and based on your arrogance and ignorance. You are the one I am assuming is attaching emotions to your responses.

Case in point. Look at your triggered response to you using other peoples facts. You jump right into defensive mode and start with the verbal attacks. This is something a diick eater would do. How do I know this? Because this is ALL YOU DO. All diick eating aside as I am sure you have temporomandibular joint disorder at this point, why would you say it seems I don't understand ohms law? We have had no such discussion for you to draw this conclusion.
 
Kari is absolutely correct, the very fact that the lawsuit got tossed is the smoking gun that proves elections are fraudulent. That also means the elections Trump contested and got tossed out of court are also fraudulent therefore making Trump the rightful POTUS. :poop:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,118,243
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top