Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
That was comical.
More of your bigotry coming out. People driving big trucks, people living in trailers. Kinda ignorant don't you think? Some of those trucks go for well over $100K. Single-wide? Not everyone needs or wants to live in something bigger.

I'd like you to just shut up now. Just close your bigoted, hypocritical mouth. You want to tell ME I am a sad representation of too many citizens of this country. Really. I dislike a handful of people in office right now. I dislike the jobs they are doing or not doing. You are so full of hate that you have grouped together literally half the country and have chosen to hate them... why, because they didn't vote like you? They don't see things the way you do? The have their own opinions? How are you going to sit their, hating half the country and try to talk down to me? Like I said, stay put, work from home and be safe.
COMPREHEND, kid. Did you notice the "6MPG" qualifier? Yeah, that regards the people like you, who think Biden sets gas prices for the world and complain about gas prices while driving a gas pig.
Yes single-wide. They NEVER appreciate in value like a house will. Don't b!tch about the economy and gas prices while living in a place that depreciates by the minute. Makes no sense.

"You are so full of hate that you have grouped together literally half the country and have chosen to hate them" "How are you going to sit their, hating half the country and try to talk down to me?"

Ironic words, coming from a guy who literally dozens of times has spoken negatively of the Democrat party, of liberals, of homosexuals, and of people in any group you dislike, as a whole.
You don't point out singular people, you speak of an entire population of them.
Yet you're upset that I do the same thing?
Hypocrite.
 
COMPREHEND, kid. Did you notice the "6MPG" qualifier? Yeah, that regards the people like you, who think Biden sets gas prices for the world and complain about gas prices while driving a gas pig.
Yes single-wide. They NEVER appreciate in value like a house will. Don't b!tch about the economy and gas prices while living in a place that depreciates by the minute. Makes no sense.

"You are so full of hate that you have grouped together literally half the country and have chosen to hate them" "How are you going to sit their, hating half the country and try to talk down to me?"

Ironic words, coming from a guy who literally dozens of times has spoken negatively of the Democrat party, of liberals, of homosexuals, and of people in any group you dislike, as a whole.
You don't point out singular people, you speak of an entire population of them.
Yet you're upset that I do the same thing?
Hypocrite.
Nice try but it didn't help you.
When I "bitch" about Democrats it is literally the ones like you. The far left libertards.
I call you a homo****** because you "claim" to be heterosexual and I KNOW it fucks with you.
Listen to you dictate how people should live or how they should speak. You fascist *******.
Comprehend? 😢 Now you want ME to decipher YOUR qualifiers! 😢 How dare you yet again be a hypocrite!!! :cry: Go shave your pubes with a rusty razor and shove some toothbrushes up your ***. Clown.
 
So you think registering as a Democrat or Republican doesn't mean you are a Democrat or Republican? Are you suggesting that all the registered Democrats should have or DID vote for Trump?

If you're not registered to vote, then it doesn't matter WHAT party you support; YOU'RE NOT VOTING. There could be 320,000,000 Republicans and 10,000,000 Democrats, but if only 1,000 Democrats register and vote and only 90 Republicans do, then the Republicans lose.
Do you think party affiliation matters if there is no matching vote?

That's the great thing about elections (for Dems). If they need your vote to be blue, it doesn't matter who you voted for or if you voted at all, you will vote blue.
 
You can tell every time Rob is confused because his response is always "So you think..."
How is that "confused"?
You admit yourself that your words have to be interpreted in each post, since you make up various definitions for the same word and use them as your narrative requires.
To add to that, one minute you want to be taken literally, the next minute you want to be taken figuratively, sometimes you want to be taken metaphorically, sometimes humorously.

The problem is that you can't match your words with how you want them to be taken until they get used against you. You make a mistake and it gets pointed out, and you suddenly claim it was "humor". You screw up worse, and call it "metaphor". You claim something is a fact, then cry about being taken literally when your "fact" turns out to be a lie.

As I said, you're way over your head here. You really should dial back your posts and try to just speak of things you know to be true (and double-check THOSE before you post).
 
From now on when somebody asks who I voted for, I'm going to answer, "I have no idea for whom my vote got cast, but I'm pretty sure dead Uncle voted Dem."

Quick question: are dems switching votes or just creating "fake" votes. Just curious because if Dems need to cover a 200k difference, they can just switch a little over 100k red ballots to blue. OTOH, "finding" over 200k ballots seems more challenging. Pulling 200k ballots seems like the most problematic method to steal an election.

Has Lake clarified how this fraud occurred?
 
From now on when somebody asks who I voted for, I'm going to answer, "I have no idea for whom my vote got cast, but I'm pretty sure dead Uncle voted Dem."

Quick question: are dems switching votes or just creating "fake" votes. Just curious because if Dems need to cover a 200k difference, they can just switch a little over 100k red ballots to blue. OTOH, "finding" over 200k ballots seems more challenging. Pulling 200k ballots seems like the most problematic method to steal an election.

Has Lake clarified how this fraud occurred?
I would think they would go for the easier possibility since all Democrats just want to live off of welfare. You know how lazy they all are.
 
How is that "confused"?
You admit yourself that your words have to be interpreted in each post, since you make up various definitions for the same word and use them as your narrative requires.
To add to that, one minute you want to be taken literally, the next minute you want to be taken figuratively, sometimes you want to be taken metaphorically, sometimes humorously.

The problem is that you can't match your words with how you want them to be taken until they get used against you. You make a mistake and it gets pointed out, and you suddenly claim it was "humor". You screw up worse, and call it "metaphor". You claim something is a fact, then cry about being taken literally when your "fact" turns out to be a lie.

As I said, you're way over your head here. You really should dial back your posts and try to just speak of things you know to be true (and double-check THOSE before you post).
Your confusion is of your own doing. YOU made the choice to only speak about "facts" as you see them. YOU have made the choice in your head that everything being discussed needs to be literal. Let me clue you in, YOU DON'T SET THE RULES ON HOW EVERYONE ELSE SPEAKS BASED ON YOUR CHOICES. You arrogant fucktrard.
 
44775
 
Your confusion is of your own doing. YOU made the choice to only speak about "facts" as you see them. YOU have made the choice in your head that everything being discussed needs to be literal. Let me clue you in, YOU DON'T SET THE RULES ON HOW EVERYONE ELSE SPEAKS BASED ON YOUR CHOICES. You arrogant fucktrard.
"YOU have made the choice in your head that everything being discussed needs to be literal."
Hate to tell you, but when it comes to facts, you HAVE to be literal. You can't just mould them as you see fit, in order to support your chosen narrative.

YOU are the one who was whining about people using their feelings to analyze and make decisions, yet you now whine about people wanting to use facts. You're worse than a girl trying to decide what lipstick she wants to wear.
Make up your mind: Do you want FACTS, or do you want FEELINGS?
 
"YOU have made the choice in your head that everything being discussed needs to be literal."
Hate to tell you, but when it comes to facts, you HAVE to be literal. You can't just mould them as you see fit, in order to support your chosen narrative.

YOU are the one who was whining about people using their feelings to analyze and make decisions, yet you now whine about people wanting to use facts. You're worse than a girl trying to decide what lipstick she wants to wear.
Make up your mind: Do you want FACTS, or do you want FEELINGS?
You are the only one whining. The fact is, we all can speak however we damn well choose. You don't dictate how we speak. If we don't want to be factual... guess what, we won't. You'll just have to suck it up son.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,119,862
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top