What is?

[RobGMN Premium Member]

He has posted another video of Trump speeches where he flails his arms. Don't recall if he was mocking/criticizing people in the speeches. Wasn't exactly the same as when he "mocked" the disabled reporter. But Trump certainly lets his hands do the talking from time to time - must have some Italian in him.

Listen, I posted it. Just because BOTH of you are now too lazy to go watch it doesn't mean I did not post it. Why do you lefties insist people hold your hands every step of the way. Is it because mommy and daddy did everything for you and you never did anything for yourselves. Is that why so many of you don't leave your parents until they evict your grown ***** or they die?

Thread - What is COVID?
Page 727
Post #10,898

Because you two are lazy *****, here is the video link. Now, Admit you were wrong.

Not buying it. The two examples he was talking about people he SAW do something. He claims he had no idea Kovaleski was disabled, so he did not see him make any movements that he could mimic.
Why would he imitate groveling movements like that if he "never saw" Kovaleski, and if Kovaleski NEVER GROVELED?
Again, his defense is what damned him.

It's funny that you are so staunchly defending Trump on this, yet are 100% convinced that the entire Biden family are ********** because Biden acts like a grandfather around kids.

You change your standards based on the narrative you want to see.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Not buying it. The two examples he was talking about people he SAW do something. he claims he had no idea Kovaleski was disabled, so he did not see him make any movements.
Why would he imitate groveling movements liek that if he "never saw" Kovaleski, and if Kovaleski NEVER GROVELED?

It's funny that you are so staunchly defending Trump on this, yet are 100% convinced that the entire Biden family are ********** because Biden acts like a grandfather around kids.

You change your standards based on the narrative you want to see.

Not buying it. Of course you don't buy it. That would mean you would have to take a different stance and take back what you said originally... which would make you wrong. RobGMN can't be wrong, he is infallible.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Not buying it. Of course you don't buy it. That would mean you would have to take a different stance and take back what you said originally... which would make you wrong. RobGMN can't be wrong, he is infallible.

My decision was based on the facts of the situation, not my feelings, like your decision.
Unless the facts somehow change, I have no reason to change my analysis or my decision.
The evidence is against him.

Speaking of infallible, when are you going to admit you screwed up with this whole "bones have no nerves in them" mess?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

My decision was based on the facts of the situation, not my feelings, like your decision.
Unless the facts somehow change, I have no reason to change my analysis or my decision.
The evidence is against him.

YOU DON'T HAVE FACTS ON WHAT TRUMP DID!!!!!!!! He is mocking 3 different people in that video compilation and he is mocking them with the same vocal tone and the same arm motions. This is how Trump mocks people. You are being biased to save face. I don't care what you believe either way, that is your choice but you don't need to lie about it.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

YOU DON'T HAVE FACTS ON WHAT TRUMP DID!!!!!!!! He is mocking 3 different people in that video compilation and he is mocking them with the same vocal tone and the same arm motions. This is how Trump mocks people. You are being biased to save face. I don't care what you believe either way, that is your choice but you don't need to lie about it.

I "don't have facts on what he did" (incorrect) but you KNOW that "This is how Trump mocks people"
How do you KNOW this information? Did he SAY this is how he mocks people? Did he write it in a memoir? Did you have a personal discussion with him? Can it be quoted from the presidential archives?
Claiming you know this info without proof is simply injecting your own bias and creating the narrative you need.

My analysis is based on the actual things he DID, and the actual things he SAID. Those are factual. Those can be verified. Easily.
Show me the factual support of your claim "This is how Trump mocks people".
I'll wait.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I "don't have facts on what he did" (incorrect) but you KNOW that "This is how Trump mocks people"
How do you KNOW this information? Did he SAY this is how he mocks people? Did he write it in a memoir? Did you have a personal discussion with him? Can it be quoted from the presidential archives?
Claiming you know this info without proof is simply injecting your own bias and creating the narrative you need.

My analysis is based on the actual things he DID, and the actual things he SAID. Those are factual. Those can be verified. Easily.
Show me the factual support of your claim "This is how Trump mocks people".
I'll wait.

Aweeee... Poor Rob. To the end huh Rob? To the end. My eyes work. I am guessing yours are flawed.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Aweeee... Poor Rob. To the end huh Rob? To the end. My eyes work. I am guessing yours are flawed.

Ohh, you're not going to provide proof of your claim while simultaneously crying that I am "biased" and judging by "feelings"?
'Funny how that hypocrisy work, huh?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Ohh, you're not going to provide proof of your claim while simultaneously crying that I am "biased" and judging by "feelings"?
'Funny how that hypocrisy work, huh?

So then Rob, can we take visual proof off the list of things you will accept as proof?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So then Rob, can we take visual proof off the list of things you will accept as proof?

You think that if I see something, I should not believe it is real?
Does that apply just to me, or people in general?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Did you watch the video I posted twice of Trump mocking more than just that reporter that way?

You are not accepting that visual evidence as proof.

That is why I ask if we should take visual proof off the list of things you will accept as proof.

Are you just stupid or are you acting?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Did you watch the video I posted twice of Trump mocking more than just that reporter that way?

You are not accepting that visual evidence as proof.

That is why I ask if we should take visual proof off the list of things you will accept as proof.

Are you just stupid or are you acting?

He wasn't mocking reporters. He was talking about a bank president, a military general, and Ted Cruz. People he SAW on TV. The fourth example is when he mocks Kovaleski, who he claims to never have seen.

Perhaps you should watch the video yourself and see the VISUAL PROOF before you make the claim "the video I posted twice of Trump mocking more than just that reporter that way".

Try to keep up with the facts, kid. Getting caught in a lie yet again looks really bad for your argument.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

He wasn't mocking reporters. He was talking about a bank president, a military general, and Ted Cruz. People he SAW on TV. The fourth example is when he mocks Kovaleski, who he claims to never have seen.

Perhaps you should watch the video yourself and see the VISUAL PROOF before you make the claim "the video I posted twice of Trump mocking more than just that reporter that way".

Try to keep up with the facts, kid. Getting caught in a lie yet again looks really bad for your argument.

I have watched it several times and he IS mocking those other people the same way. They are all equally mocked. You have chosen to focus on the reporter because of a still frame that was used to elicit a desired response from those on the left. It worked and you fell for it. The truth is, he has mocked people the same way BEFORE he mocked the reporter. Ignore facts if you like if that is what it takes to continue your narrative.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I have watched it several times and he IS mocking those other people the same way. They are all equally mocked. You have chosen to focus on the reporter because of a still frame that was used to elicit a desired response from those on the left. It worked and you fell for it. The truth is, he has mocked people the same way BEFORE he mocked the reporter. Ignore facts if you like if that is what it takes to continue your narrative.

So now your story changes from "this is how he mocks reporters" because you posted "proof" of him mocking multiple reporters this way. Except the proof shows no such thing.

So your proof is not even what you think it is, but your decision remains the same.
Biased and based on feelings.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So now your story changes from "this is how he mocks reporters" because you posted "proof" of him mocking multiple reporters this way. Except the proof shows no such thing.

So your proof is not even what you think it is, but your decision remains the same.
Biased and based on feelings.

My story hasn't changed. What is wrong with you?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So now your story changes from "this is how he mocks reporters" because you posted "proof" of him mocking multiple reporters this way. Except the proof shows no such thing.

So your proof is not even what you think it is, but your decision remains the same.
Biased and based on feelings.

So you didn't watch it now you are telling me my story has changed then saying it doesn't show him mocking people? Your screws are loose fella.