What is?

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Cool, now tell me why, if you have this knowledge and know there are different ways to use words, can't you two use comprehension and common sense? Why must you try to educate people instead of going "Ahh, I see where you are going, however, what if...". Nope, you guys think we all need lessons in this and lessons in that. You first assume that whatever way you would use a word is the first and correct way to use it... even though you have this before mentioned knowledge. Unless you are both full of shit, just want to argue then find facts to support your arguments. I can see that being more true.

Going back to the Clinton example, he was just spinning to get out of a jam that created for himself and you appear to be doing the same. In this case, there was this whole thing about nerves not being in bone. Then you disputed that bones can feel pain. Then nerves only "go through" the bone, but clearly there are nerve endings in bone. Nerves aren't part of the bone, etc, etc, etc.

Furthermore, if you choose to use words in some non-traditional way, how is it the reader's fault for not understanding that? You're the one that disputed all the medically accepted facts about bone that demonstrate there are nerves in the bone, the nerves aren't part of the bone, etc, etc, etc. I don't see how that's on "everybody else."

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

My Brother is dead. I had a place with my Brother. When he died, I moved.
I do a lot of checking on things to make sure they are still functioning correctly and are safe.
I check my car tires every time before I drive it. I check my cars lights once a week. I check door locks, water faucets, toilets, lights. There is nothing wrong with safety checks. No reason at all? No, there is always a reason for taking or not taking an action.

BTW - pop that dick out of your mouth. It was your claim that I have verified facts that prove medical science has been wrong all this time. Yeah, that was a dumb *** comment you made now you want me to prove your comment. Yes, you are probably psychotic. You have done this multiple times. Make something up then demand I prove it. How about YOU prove it. Ya gay bitch.

Ad hominem, yawn, ad hominem.

Anyway, you specifically mentioned the facts that you have that I would consider wrong simply because they dispute the facts I know.

Your words: “And if I provide facts that dispute YOUR facts then mine are wrong and I am wrong... funny how you work like that.”
This is a statement that the situation has actually happened.

Have I “work(ed) like that” and not accepted your facts simply because they dispute what I have given? Or have I not accepted them because they are not verified or verifiable and are simply claims you demand are fact?
Big difference.

Since you claim to have the facts, I’ll again ask for these facts that prove medical science is wrong and has been wrong for over a century.
It’s not politics. It’s not feelings. It’s not happy or sad. It’s just facts.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Going back to the Clinton example, he was just spinning to get out of a jam that created for himself and you appear to be doing the same. In this case, there was this whole thing about nerves not being in bone. Then you disputed that bones can feel pain. Then nerves only "go through" the bone, but clearly there are nerve endings in bone. Nerves aren't part of the bone, etc, etc, etc.

Furthermore, if you choose to use words in some non-traditional way, how is it the reader's fault for not understanding that? You're the one that disputed all the medically accepted facts about bone that demonstrate there are nerves in the bone, the nerves aren't part of the bone, etc, etc, etc. I don't see how that's on "everybody else."

Here, I will clear this up for you too. I don't get in a jam, I don't get "in trouble". I am a grown *** man. If you guys don't agree with what I am saying that's fine. Don't. It matters not to me. I also don't backpedal, grovel, beg for forgiveness or other.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Ad hominem, yawn, ad hominem.

Anyway, you specifically mentioned the facts that you have that I would consider wrong simply because they dispute the facts I know.

Your words: “And if I provide facts that dispute YOUR facts then mine are wrong and I am wrong... funny how you work like that.”
This is a statement that the situation has actually happened.

Have I “work(ed) like that” and not accepted your facts simply because they dispute what I have given? Or have I not accepted them because they are not verified or verifiable and are simply claims you demand are fact?
Big difference.

Since you claim to have the facts, I’ll again ask for these facts that prove medical science is wrong and has been wrong for over a century.
It’s not politics. It’s not feelings. It’s not happy or sad. It’s just facts.

You tell me Rob. I am sure you would say because they are not verified or verifiable or whatever you had to say so that you can look like you know more. Yeah, we get it Rob.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

LOL - mini riot over covid restrictions.

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You tell me Rob. I am sure you would say because they are not verified or verifiable or whatever you had to say so that you can look like you know more. Yeah, we get it Rob.

That’s kind of an important thing with facts, wouldn’t you agree?

If you go to buy an amp and the salesperson says “this one will do 1,500 watts RMS full-spectrum” but the amp is $75.00, weighs a pound and has a 10AMP fuse, do you accept it, or ask for proof?
Is “trust me” or “because I said so” proof enough for you?

All I am asking for is proof of your claim about nerves not being in bones. Not “trust me” or “because I said so” and not proof that is unverified or unverifiable.
That should not be too much to ask for in a discussion like this, and not too much to ask for since it should be right at your fingertips.

Given the simplicity of the request, why didn’t you just do it forever and a post ago?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

That’s kind of an important thing with facts, wouldn’t you agree?

If you go to buy an amp and the salesperson says “this one will do 1,500 watts RMS full-spectrum” but the amp is $75.00, weighs a pound and has a 10AMP fuse, do you accept it, or ask for proof?
Is “trust me” or “because I said so” proof enough for you?

All I am asking for is proof of your claim about nerves not being in bones. Not “trust me” or “because I said so” and not proof that is unverified or unverifiable.
That should not be too much to ask for in a discussion like this, and not too much to ask for since it should be right at your fingertips.

Given the simplicity of the request, why didn’t you just do it forever and a post ago?

Look, just trust me... they ain't in there. Would I lie to you?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Look, just trust me... they ain't in there. Would I lie to you?

Yes. And you have. Disappointing.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Yes. And you have. Disappointing.

Leave it to an idiot to answer a joke but not a serious question. You know that by choosing yes or no will destroy your position on the topic so you are choosing not to answer. You are almost as much of a coward as Booby.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Leave it to an idiot to answer a joke but not a serious question. You know that by choosing yes or no will destroy your position on the topic so you are choosing not to answer. You are almost as much of a coward as Booby.

Did you miss the “yes” in my post. It was literally a one-word sentence to answer your question.
Yes. You would lie and have lied.
Don’t ask questions you don’t want the answer to, even if asked as satire.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

I'm not here to change your mind. I'm just saying the evidence isn't that convincing. Maybe he is making fun of the guy, I certainly wouldn't put it past him. Maybe he's just flailing about. Do I really care one way or the other, not really. This pales in comparison to the "big lie."

And the voter's spoke.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

You need to stop asking for that proof since I posted a video showing it to you. He HAS done this to other reporters. Stop ignoring shit just so you can keep typing.

Please show me the video where he mocks a different reporter the same way.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

You need to stop asking for that proof since I posted a video showing it to you. He HAS done this to other reporters. Stop ignoring shit just so you can keep typing.

Post the video kid. I'll wait.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

LOL, I came here to post the same news. I guess some people are unaware that numerous "safe and effective" drugs do have side effects and even occasionally kill people. I guess while some of us accepted that as common knowledge (watch any drug commercial on TV), it is surprising to a certain subset of people.

In the case of the Moderna vaccine your chances of getting myo/pericarditis is .00035%. The powers that be, researchers, FDA, CDC, the law firms who will have to litigate the cases, et al have some reason concluded that .00035% risk is worth the reward.

BTW, the link between the vax and myocarditis was never denied, as a matter of fact quiet the opposite, it was established right out of the gate - I'd say within weeks. Additionally, myo/pericarditis are well known adverse effects of any vaccine or viral infection.

In all, more than 2.2 million second Pfizer doses were given and more than 870,000 Moderna doses. Within 21 days of the second dose, there were a total of 59 myocarditis cases (21 Pfizer and 31 Moderna) and 41 pericarditis cases (21 Pfizer and 20 Moderna). Researchers also looked at rates per million doses and the rate was 35.6 cases per million for Moderna and 12.6 per million for Pfizer-;an almost threefold increase after Moderna shots vs. Pfizer. Comparatively, rates of myocarditis in the general population in 2018, were 2.01 per million in people under age 40 and 2.2 per million in people over age 40.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/2...een-Pfizer-and-Moderna-COVID-19-vaccines.aspx

He doesn't care. He wouldn't even get a shot if it cured his condition and he could start designing again (with crayons). I think people call that a "lost cause."

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

He doesn't care. He wouldn't even get a shot if it cured his condition and he could start designing again (with crayons). I think people call that a "lost cause."

That sentence makes me think of the people denying COVID with their last breath. The last breath because COVID killed them.
They're like the religious zealots who insist god will cure their ruptured appendix. And then they die.

Has there been a case recorded yet of god fixing something like that?