Your facts would not just have to dispute mine, they would have to be verified as accurate through the scientific method. If you have facts that have been verified as such, and that disprove that bones have nerves in them, then you should have shared it long ago.And if I provide facts that dispute YOUR facts then mine are wrong and I am wrong... funny how you work like that.
Additionally, you should be sharing it with the medical community and be on tour showing everyone that you turned science on its ear. You disproved something that was first proved over a century ago, has been confirmed probably hundreds of times in real-world practice, and has been accepted by the entire medical community as true.
i do not accept a simple DISPUTE of a well-known fact as PROOF that the well-known fact is incorrect or inaccurate. 'Kind of like the claims of perpetual motion or cold fusion that are always around, but can never be demonstrated.
THAT is how I work.
So go ahead and share these verified facts you have that prove medical science has been wrong all this time. We have been asking for your proof all along.
