I am glad you asked that question, rhetorical or not. Why post a bunch of "what if's" as you called it. Well, it starts conversations. That's why. It allows for interaction from other people and sets the tone for a back and forth, an exchange of thoughts, opinions and information.
Why not just post provable facts? <--- This was your question. Well, for one, this is an internet forum. It is not a place where every outcome depends on or needs facts. This is a place literally created for continuing conversations between people. You know, a "conversation" - a talk, especially an informal one, between two or more people, in which news and ideas are exchanged.
You far left guys apparently feel your conversation skills are sub-par or you may not know how to have an actual conversation. Whatever the situation it has caused you to fall back on just posting what you have accepted as facts and now think arguments are conversation. If they had only taught something in school that might help...
With that said MSNBC is already telling us "Wide spread voter fraud does not exist in the United States" Why do they feel the need to tell us this? The voting isn't even done yet and they are already in defensive mode. Now if Republicans win will the left remember that there is no wide spread voter fraud or will they cry foul?
freespeech.org
