- Status
Jimi77
Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Yeah, it goes straight into Pelosi's bank account.
Oh how I miss the days of Trump, when tax revenues only went where they supposed to...
“Rules are for me, but not for thee”
Right, hypocrites?
Right, hypocrites?
"Actual free speech"? You mean like when Trump wanted to pin liability on private companies for allowing people to post their free speech on social media?
"Section 230 says that internet platforms that host third-party content — think of tweets on Twitter, posts on Facebook, photos on Instagram, reviews on Yelp, or a news outlet’s reader comments — are not liable for what those third parties post (with a few exceptions). For instance, if a Yelp reviewer were to post something defamatory about a business, the business could sue the reviewer for libel, but it couldn’t sue Yelp. Without Section 230’s protections, the internet as we know it today would not exist. If the law were taken away, many websites driven by user-generated content would likely go dark.
After Facebook and Twitter deleted posts containing factual inaccuracies about the risks of Covid-19, Trump issued his loudest demand yet to repeal the law:
So sorry to let facts get in the way of your dumbass memes, child.
And yet it's always the Republicans found to be cheating when investigations happen.
- Status
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
About this thread
- Start date
- Participants
- Who Replied
- Replies
- 33,976
- Views
- 1,118,696
- Last reply date
- Last reply from
- Buck
