Winners only.

[RobGMN Premium Member]

No, you proved there is a list under the law. What is this administration claiming from this list as th reason to tap the reserves. It's a straight forward question. If you don't know then just say you don't. But don't drone on and on clinging to nothing until the end.

"Because of Putin’s war of choice, less oil is getting to market, and the reduction in supply is raising prices at the pump for Americans"
"a significant amount of Russian oil is not making it to market"

severe energy supply interruption
(8) The term “severe energy supply interruption” means a national energy supply shortage which the President determines— (A) is, or is likely to be, of significant scope and duration, and of an emergency nature; (B) may cause major adverse impact on national safety or the national economy; and (C) results, or is likely to result, from (i) an interruption in the supply of imported petroleum products, (ii) an interruption in the supply of domestic petroleum products, or (iii) sabotage, an act of terrorism, or an act of God.

This is the reason.
Now I will ask you yet again: What action of tapping the SPR was "illegal", and why was it "illegal" under the law established in 1975?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

That's right MY OPINIONS, the way I see things, what I believe is not up for debate. They are mine and mine alone.

If I were to say God exist... that is my opinion. Who the fuck are you to think you need to debate it?
If I want to say gay *** is gross... That is my opinion. Who the fuck are you to tell me I am wrong?

When I say Presidents can affect oil prices it's because they can through direct and indirect actions. Tell me why you think they can't.

Yeah, Biden and his Admin want credit for bringing down the price of gas. That's what I said!!!!

No that's not what you said. A dozen pages and you never once mentioned Biden taking credit....

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No that's not what you said. A dozen pages and you never once mentioned Biden taking credit....

Well then you read about as well as Rob does then.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"Because of Putin’s war of choice, less oil is getting to market, and the reduction in supply is raising prices at the pump for Americans"
"a significant amount of Russian oil is not making it to market"

severe energy supply interruption
(8) The term “severe energy supply interruption” means a national energy supply shortage which the President determines— (A) is, or is likely to be, of significant scope and duration, and of an emergency nature; (B) may cause major adverse impact on national safety or the national economy; and (C) results, or is likely to result, from (i) an interruption in the supply of imported petroleum products, (ii) an interruption in the supply of domestic petroleum products, or (iii) sabotage, an act of terrorism, or an act of God.

This is the reason.
Now I will ask you yet again: What action of tapping the SPR was "illegal", and why was it "illegal" under the law established in 1975?

Ahhh so the answer is to tap our reserve instead of upping production on our own soil. What a dashing idea. Let's piss Russia off knowing good damn well what the results will be then we can deplete our reserves, problem solved, now let's force everyone to go green like we tried to force them to take a vaccine they didn't need. Man, they are on the ball huh.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Well then you read about as well as Rob does then.

You're active here.
Are you going to explain the "illegal" nature of the SPR transactions? I did ask earlier. And I did answer your question of why it was legal. With direct references to the CFR.

Can also you show us where you changed your thinking from last week that Biden made prices go up but cannot make them go down, to Biden did things that may or may not affect pricing directly or indirectly?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You're active here.
Are you going to explain the "illegal" nature of the SPR transactions? I did ask earlier. And I did answer your question of why it was legal. With direct references to the CFR.

Can also you show us where you changed your thinking from last week that Biden made prices go up but cannot make them go down, to Biden did things that may or may not affect pricing directly or indirectly?

Can you prove to me you don't have both male and female *** organs? Can you prove to me that your brain is not damaged?

Illegal as they, the current admin, have created false crisis so that they can deplete the reserves in their quest to go green. Prove they aren't doing that.

I showed your ignorant and willfully stupid *** a post from July 22 this year where I also said Biden can affect gas prices... why are you ignoring that? Answer that question before you comment on anything else or seriously fuck off.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Can you prove to me you don't have both male and female *** organs? Can you prove to me that your brain is not damaged?

Illegal as they, the current admin, have created false crisis so that they can deplete the reserves in their quest to go green. Prove they aren't doing that.

I showed your ignorant and willfully stupid *** a post from July 22 this year where I also said Biden can affect gas prices... why are you ignoring that? Answer that question before you comment on anything else or seriously **** off.

I fail to see your proof that the actions taken violated the CFR.

Please show us how they "created a false crisis". Be specific. Avoid ad hominem attacks, red herrings, appeals to ignorance, and all the other logical fallacies that you use so unskillfully.

JUST TELL US WHAT PART OF THE LAW WAS VIOLATED, AND HOW.

You have argued all along the "Biden raised gas prices". That is a far cry from direct or indirect actions that may or may not affect gas prices.

Try harder, kid. You're falling further behind the curve with every lie.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

That's not an explanation of why the decisions made were illegal. it's simply a complaint that you think they don't know how the SPR works.

So, again please, explain how the actions taken broke the CFR established in 1975. The CFR established specifically to allow for use of the SPR as they have been used this year and in years past.

Me.... You.... Brick wall. Why constantly demand shit over and over when any and all responses will get the same reaction from you? Fuck off.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Terms and things the left doesn't understand:

Humor
Metaphors
Figure of speech
Gist
Jest
Quote
Opinions
Feelings
The phrase "You are wrong"
Morals
Ethics
Fair Play
Equal Opportunity
Proper voting procedures
Rules
and so on...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Me.... You.... Brick wall. Why constantly demand shit over and over when any and all responses will get the same reaction from you? Fuck off.

In other words your false claims are "not up for discussion"?
You cry that we should answer your rhetorical questions and demand that we provide proof, but you are exempt form meeting those standards?

For someone who constantly calls other people "hypocrite", that sure is some hypocritical action.
Not what I would call "fair play".

I have said and proved "you are wrong" to you in myriad ways, but you refuse to prove you are right. it seems you don't understand the phrase "you are worng".

You have claimed that your erroneous feelings are humor, yet defend the errors with all your heart and soul instead of saying "I was joking. I don't feel that way".

You have lied and been caught in lies here several times. Not a moral thing to do.

You declare Biden broke laws in using the SPR, but the law clearly states he can do it. You must not understand rules.

Once again, your words have trapped you back in that corner. if your list in the post above is accurate, then you are labeling yourself a Democrat.
Interesting turn of events.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

In other words your false claims are "not up for discussion"?
You cry that we should answer your rhetorical questions and demand that we provide proof, but you are exempt form meeting those standards.

For someone who constantly calls other people "hypocrite", that sure is some hypocritical action.

Nice dodge. You have avoided many questions.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Nice dodge. You have avoided many questions.

The red herring. You have not asked any. So go ahead and ask.

While typing the questions, speak to this request:

I fail to see your proof that the actions taken violated the CFR.
Please show us how they "created a false crisis". Be specific. Avoid ad hominem attacks, red herrings, appeals to ignorance, and all the other logical fallacies that you use so unskillfully.

JUST TELL US WHAT PART OF THE LAW WAS VIOLATED, AND HOW.

"Why constantly demand shit over and over when any and all responses will get the same reaction from you? **** off." is not a question that is asking for an answer.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The red herring. You have not asked any. So go ahead and ask.

While typing the questions, speak to this request:

I fail to see your proof that the actions taken violated the CFR.
Please show us how they "created a false crisis". Be specific. Avoid ad hominem attacks, red herrings, appeals to ignorance, and all the other logical fallacies that you use so unskillfully.

JUST TELL US WHAT PART OF THE LAW WAS VIOLATED, AND HOW.

Seriously, homo, you are going to tell me to not use ad hominems? Did you not read the laws yourself? Do you think this administration is not capable of what I said? Do you want to take the red or blue pill? Tell me why they would not create a crisis to deplete our oil so they could complete their goal of going green. You lover of gay men.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]