Winners only.

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"If you are working on that lunch you are working off the clock. It is not rocket science, not a Trump conspiracy... It's just breaking the law."
"There are reasons for these laws and none of your spins or fast talking would fool a judge or prosecuting attorney."
-Thxone

These are your words, your singular views that YOU posted, and there really aren't any "multiple meanings" that could be claimed of them.
It is very clear that you think working during a lunch hour is working "off the clock", which is "breaking the law".
Working "off the clock" is "the work employees perform outside of their working hours and for which they are not compensated." Skipping a 30-consecutive -minutes lunch but taking three ten-minute breaks is not "working off the clock", no matter how much you FEEL it should be. So you're already wrong on that point, but we'll continue:

The second part of what you say there is also very clear. It states *I* am "breaking the law", since *I* would be the one "working off the clock".

In another post, you tack on that none of my "spins or fast talking would fool a judge or prosecuting attorney". This indicates you think *I* would be in court, defending myself in front of a judge or prosecuting attorney. There is no other reason those people would hear my "spins or fast talking", except for ME being prosecuted. In court. For breaking your "law".

So, it is fully established that *I* would be the one breaking the law AND that *I* would be the one going to court for doing so. These are YOUR claims. Clear as crystal.
Given those claims: What is the legal punishment I could face if my defense is a failure and I get convicted of breaking this law you believe exists?

I'm not asking for an employer-meted punishment, but a LEGAL punishment from the JUDGE.
What is it?

This is the LAST time I will attempt to help you understand.

This is a simplified example. Let's say you work for McDonalds. In reality you are the employee, they are the employer. You are BOTH McDonalds. You as an employee represent McDonalds and anything you do can have consequences for Mcdonalds. This includes violating labor laws. It does not matter what the reason is or was you cannot work off the clock.

Part of the problem you are having is YOU think it is not violating labor laws because you are rearranging the minutes in which you do it. Labor laws are also clear federally and by state how many and how often workers get breaks and how long those breaks have to be. You are trying to argue something else for your ego.

If your employer is brought to trial and you are called in to testify that you worked off the clock, your fast talk and spins wont help and your employer will still bare the punishments for you working off the clock. If you continue to refuse to understand I am not interested in explaining it a 7th time. I am done.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Biden may have, but he can honestly say, "I don't recall."

I like that.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

This is the LAST time I will attempt to help you understand.

This is a simplified example. Let's say you work for McDonalds. In reality you are the employee, they are the employer. You are BOTH McDonalds. You as an employee represent McDonalds and anything you do can have consequences for Mcdonalds. This includes violating labor laws. It does not matter what the reason is or was you cannot work off the clock.

Part of the problem you are having is YOU think it is not violating labor laws because you are rearranging the minutes in which you do it. Labor laws are also clear federally and by state how many and how often workers get breaks and how long those breaks have to be. You are trying to argue something else for your ego.

If your employer is brought to trial and you are called in to testify that you worked off the clock, your fast talk and spins wont help and your employer will still bare the punishments for you working off the clock. If you continue to refuse to understand I am not interested in explaining it a 7th time. I am done.

Instead of ignoring the very simple question I have asked, you post these multi-paragraph tapdances to avoid being proved wrong.

I asked you at least five times to simply answer what punishment I could receive for breaking the law that you insist applies to me, and that I would be breaking and prosecute for.

You refuse to answer the question. So you either cannot or will not.
Either way, not answering the question means you have no facts to support what you claim; what you are claiming is merely your feelings about the law.

You FEEL the law applies to me and I can get in legal trouble and be punished for breaking this “law”, but you can’t or won’t support your feelings by presenting facts.
That’s a failed argument on your part.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Instead of ignoring the very simple question I have asked, you post these multi-paragraph tapdances to avoid being proved wrong.

I asked you at least five times to simply answer what punishment I could receive for breaking the law that you insist applies to me, and that I would be breaking and prosecute for.

You refuse to answer the question. So you either cannot or will not.
Either way, not answering the question means you have no facts to support what you claim; what you are claiming is merely your feelings about the law.

You FEEL the law applies to me and I can get in legal trouble and be punished for breaking this “law”, but you can’t or won’t support your feelings by presenting facts.
That’s a failed argument on your part.

Just like you refuse to stop being an idiot and comprehend. You keep doing you and being unethical while putting your employer at risk. I said I was done and will not explain it to you again.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Brought to you by the Great Reset people

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Brought to you by the Great Reset people

And what is so bad about using technology to help the teacher and students achieve better education outcomes? Worried our cheap labor pool will dry up???

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Brought to you by the Great Reset people

I am not a fan. Reading facial expressions to determine the persons emotional state??? Facial expressions can be faked. What if the person is just engaged in a conversation and is trying to convey something via a facial expression and this system tags the person for having an emotional state that has been programmed into this system as dangerous and the child is removed and punished for being some kind of threat?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I am not a fan. Reading facial expressions to determine the persons emotional state??? Facial expressions can be faked. What if the person is just engaged in a conversation and is trying to convey something via a facial expression and this system tags the person for having an emotional state that has been programmed into this system as dangerous and the child is removed and punished for being some kind of threat?

Looks so dystopian. Sitting in a classroom where they limit how you think to be the perfect little obeying drone for the state. There’s no humanity in that, and you know some moron toolkit is the one setting the rules.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Looks so dystopian. Sitting in a classroom where they limit how you think to be the perfect little obeying drone for the state. There’s no humanity in that, and you know some moron toolkit is the one setting the rules.

The more obedient you make them the easier it is to have your way with them.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

The more obedient you make them the easier it is to have your way with them.

It’s straight up training slaves. Our gov involvement in schooling has made our national intelligence dive off a cliff. Everything the gov gets involved with just doesn’t work correctly.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

It’s straight up training slaves. Our gov involvement in schooling has made our national intelligence dive off a cliff. Everything the gov gets involved with just doesn’t work correctly.

Yet other countries whose govt's are even more heavily involved in education blow us out of the water. OTOH, I think you'd be hard pressed to find countries with no gov't education system are severely lacking - ie look at what the religious schools in the middle east are producing.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I am not a fan. Reading facial expressions to determine the persons emotional state??? Facial expressions can be faked. What if the person is just engaged in a conversation and is trying to convey something via a facial expression and this system tags the person for having an emotional state that has been programmed into this system as dangerous and the child is removed and punished for being some kind of threat?

One would HOPE that if they have ways to analyze emotional state by facial expression, they’d also be able to easily determine a “misdiagnosed” emotional state.

Unless of course, they shoot first and ask questions later.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

I think you're wrong; he has a D&D strategy: Deny & Delay. He doesn't really Distract. As a matter of fact he does the opposite of distract, he loves the attention. Trump definitely embraces the "There is no such thing as bad publicity" motto. I wonder if it's a campaign strategy so he play and victim card and continue whining about the "deep state."

I meant distract by bringing up other shit. Witch hunt, Democrats, Hunter, Biden, Pelosi, McConnell, Cheney, etc....

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

It’s straight up training slaves. Our gov involvement in schooling has made our national intelligence dive off a cliff. Everything the gov gets involved with just doesn’t work correctly.

Remember when your boy Trump believed Putin over our own intelligence? You probably don't. Do some research.