What is?

[ThxOne Premium Member]

A “clown” chooses reputable and trustworthy over lies and misinformation? I guess I’m a clown, then.

You can be the ringmaster and choose stupidity. Congrats?

And you couldn't give a specific one... not one. Just your usual fast talking bullshit.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

5'1" 235lbs

That would raise questions about all the women you claim to bang as the leading ladies’ man of the forum.
Did you pay them all?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

That would raise questions about all the women you claim to bang as the leading ladies’ man of the forum.
Did you pay them all?

I'd probably have to if I was 5'1" tall and round like a ball. Even stranger would be the actual fact of my 76" reach.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

And you couldn't give a specific one... not one. Just your usual fast talking bullshit.

Give a specific what? Source?
OK, here’s one: Gray’s Anatomy. A medical book that’s been around for over a century. I would trust their take on bones having nerves in them more than I would yours.

Care for another? The CFR and state statutes. I would trust them more to provide information on law than I would trust you.

More? The NIH. I would trust them more than a far-right website that provides incomplete and out-of-context quotes of NIH documents in order to push a narrative?

More? The OED. I trust the OED more to provide an accurate definition of a word than I would trust you to give a definition.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Give a specific what? Source?
OK, here’s one: Gray’s Anatomy. A medical book that’s been around for over a century. I would trust their take on bones having nerves in them more than I would yours.

Care for another? The CFR and state statutes. I would trust them more to provide information on law than I would trust you.

More? The NIH. I would trust them more than a far-right website that provides incomplete and out-of-context quotes of NIH documents in order to push a narrative?

More? The OED. I trust the OED more to provide an accurate definition of a word than I would trust you to give a definition.

We were specifically talking about news sources. Dude, you are making my boner go away.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I'd probably have to if I was 5'1" tall and round like a ball. Even stranger would be the actual fact of my 76" reach.

So, another member asks for honesty and you post a lie.
And you get angry when people ask you to prove the bullshlt you post as “fact”.
Go figure

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

We were specifically talking about news sources. Dude, you are making my boner go away.

Medical data doesn’t come from news sources. You look to Fox or CNBC or Zerohedge for medical data?

Which one told you there are no nerves in bone?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So, another member asks for honesty and you post a lie.
And you get angry when people ask you to prove the bullshlt you post as “fact”.
Go figure

I can see you calling it a lie while others might call it humor. Since lefties apparently have none, I am 5'10" tall, I wear a size 10 shoe, I am 188lbs, I have a 76" reach, I am well above average down there, I have blue eyes and brown hair, I sport a decently groomed beard and I am right handed. Good enough?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Medical data doesn’t come from news sources. You look to Fox or CNBC or Zerohedge for medical data?

Which one told you there are no nerves in bone?

When I chimed in you were commenting on someone posting info from what you called a bad source and it was a news site. I ask you to specifically tell us the good one's.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I can see you calling it a lie while others might call it humor. Since lefties apparently have none, I am 5'10" tall, I wear a size 10 shoe, I am 188lbs, I have a 76" reach, I am well above average down there, I have blue eyes and brown hair, I sport a decently groomed beard and I am right handed. Good enough?

Your reach is 6” more than your height. That’s unique. Familial trait?

 

[powerlifter405]

I bet 95% of the people on this forum technically have a co-morbidity. The graphs would say I'm obese at 5'11" and 195 pounds. I asked you if you would've worn a mask if HIV was transmissible in the air?

Yep, and certain ones are worse than others.
It didn't stop me from sharing drinks and doing food prep together so probably not.
I'd have to look at the table but its not accurate as it does not take into account factors besides scale weight and height.
At 200+ and only 5'7" I was morbidly obese by BMI standards yet my labs were medically perfect, I had a 31" waist, I could easily carry a sofa pull out couch over my head and didn't need transmission jacks to do transmission work.

Just like urgent cares don't have to provide medical aid to you if don't have the right insurance. You want people to have a choice to not get vaxxed or not but don't want to give Doctor's a choice if they want to see the unvaxxed or not. You have an interesting thought process.

But providers are refusing care based on rona vax status which goes against their Hippocratic Oath oath. By refusing care they are doing harm and you did make the comment about dr refusing trump supporters. Its not 100% the same but the mantra exists. Cops will stop responding to family violence calls until callers profess their stance on 'defund the police'.

A dr wanting to go down that route should have the ethical scruples to provide alternate providers to customers. I wouldn't want to be seen by a dr who's views are so askew-ed of my own, that is causes me to question the veracity of their treatment they might actually provide. I actually dumped my first dr in my current city after she tried to shove meds down my throat that I did not agree with.

If we do go down that route, police, fire and EMT should stop responding to calls in bad neighborhoods.
Like the saying goes, kill'em all and let God sort them out. But my dr and her whole clinic refused the rona vaxx so I'm good to go. No harm no foul.

If a doctor decides to go that route, they should let their current patients and the public be aware so potential patients can make informed decisions.

Lastly, the AMA code of ethics:
1.1.2 Prospective Patients
As professionals dedicated to protecting the well-being of patients, physicians have an ethical obligation
to provide care in cases of medical emergency. Physicians must also uphold ethical responsibilities not
to discriminate against a prospective patient on the basis of race, gender, ****** orientation or gender
identity, or other personal or social characteristics that are not clinically relevant to the individual’s care.
Nor may physicians decline a patient based solely on the individual’s infectious disease status.

Since the rona was so severe, millions dying right, Dr's shouldn't be turning people away.

(c) Meeting the medical needs of the prospective patient could seriously compromise the physician’s
ability to provide the care needed by his or her other patients. The greater the prospective patient’s
medical need, however, the stronger is the physician’s obligation to provide care, in keeping with
the professional obligation to promote access to care.

I don't like forcing any profession to do work they deem unethical, religiously conflicting, etc.. but they should have no issue making their stance public. Its a slippery slope.

 

[powerlifter405]

Your graph is junk. I'll believe John's Hopkins. It's still over 1%.

View attachment 43377

Its late, I'm tired and sober lol
I'm not sure which graph your referring too?

 

[powerlifter405]

We were specifically talking about news sources. Dude, you are making my boner go away.

You two fukers go at it constantly but that is some funny shit right there
Thats going in my sig

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

When I chimed in you were commenting on someone posting info from what you called a bad source and it was a news site. I ask you to specifically tell us the good one's.

OK. I had said to Bucko: "If you want to push a narrative, try using sources that aren't widely known for being full of shit, maybe?" I didn't say news sources. just sources.
You chimed in with: "Ahhhhhhhhhhh tell us Rob, which are the "correct sources". Please be specific. "Specific" means clearly defined or identified."
I responded: "Sources that are not widely known for promoting lies and misinformation."

I didn't identify specific sources, but your request said "clearly defined OR identified".
I would consider my description as "clearly defined", given that it is very easy to find out what any information source is all about (political leaning, financial motive, background of authors, how the info came to be, etc) and whether they are widely known to be full of shit (like the one he linked to).
Fair?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Yep, and certain ones are worse than others.
It didn't stop me from sharing drinks and doing food prep together so probably not.
I'd have to look at the table but its not accurate as it does not take into account factors besides scale weight and height.
At 200+ and only 5'7" I was morbidly obese by BMI standards yet my labs were medically perfect, I had a 31" waist, I could easily carry a sofa pull out couch over my head and didn't need transmission jacks to do transmission work.



But providers are refusing care based on rona vax status which goes against their Hippocratic Oath oath. By refusing care they are doing harm and you did make the comment about dr refusing trump supporters. Its not 100% the same but the mantra exists. Cops will stop responding to family violence calls until callers profess their stance on 'defund the police'.

A dr wanting to go down that route should have the ethical scruples to provide alternate providers to customers. I wouldn't want to be seen by a dr who's views are so askew-ed of my own, that is causes me to question the veracity of their treatment they might actually provide. I actually dumped my first dr in my current city after she tried to shove meds down my throat that I did not agree with.

If we do go down that route, police, fire and EMT should stop responding to calls in bad neighborhoods.
Like the saying goes, kill'em all and let God sort them out. But my dr and her whole clinic refused the rona vaxx so I'm good to go. No harm no foul.

If a doctor decides to go that route, they should let their current patients and the public be aware so potential patients can make informed decisions.

Lastly, the AMA code of ethics:
1.1.2 Prospective Patients
As professionals dedicated to protecting the well-being of patients, physicians have an ethical obligation
to provide care in cases of medical emergency. Physicians must also uphold ethical responsibilities not
to discriminate against a prospective patient on the basis of race, gender, ****** orientation or gender
identity, or other personal or social characteristics that are not clinically relevant to the individual’s care.
Nor may physicians decline a patient based solely on the individual’s infectious disease status.

Since the rona was so severe, millions dying right, Dr's shouldn't be turning people away.

(c) Meeting the medical needs of the prospective patient could seriously compromise the physician’s
ability to provide the care needed by his or her other patients. The greater the prospective patient’s
medical need, however, the stronger is the physician’s obligation to provide care, in keeping with
the professional obligation to promote access to care.

I don't like forcing any profession to do work they deem unethical, religiously conflicting, etc.. but they should have no issue making their stance public. Its a slippery slope.

It sounds like the Doctor's don't want to put their and their family's health at risk. That is perfectly fine with me. That should be their choice. If you didn't want to take medicine as prescribed by a Doctor then why did you go to the Doctor? You should just treat yourself from now on. Republicans are always crying about having the freedom to choose then why can't Doctor's have that same right?