- Status
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
'Why is natural immunity remaining protective for the unvaccinated, whereas in the vaccinated their ‘protection’ goes negative even if they have natural immunity?'
dailysceptic.org
Covid Vaccine Destroys Natural Immunity, NEJM Study Shows – The Daily Sceptic
A new study in NEJM shows not only that Pfizer vaccine effectiveness becomes negative within five months but that the vaccines destroy any protection a person would have had from natural immunity.
dailysceptic.org
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
'Dr. Desmet explains that a strategy for those coping with the constant anxiety is to form a new social connection to battle the object causing fear (death from a virus) with a collective singlemindedness (masks, social distancing and the ultimate weapon, vaccines). “All the anxiety connects to this object [virus] and people are willing to follow the strategy [vaccines] to deal with this object, no matter what the cost.”
Accordingly, he says that a “new kind of social bond emerges and a new kind of sense-making.” The sudden switch from lack of connection to a massive social connection leads to a mental intoxication. This intoxicated state, Dr. Desmet says is “what makes mass formation, or crowd formation, the exact equivalent of hypnosis.”
Dr. Desmet emphasizes that it “doesn’t matter anymore whether the narrative is correct or wrong, even blatantly wrong. What matters is that it leads up to this mental intoxication. And that’s why they continue to go along with the narrative, even if they could know by thinking for one second, that it is wrong.”
The official narrative cannot be challenged, or the hypnosis could break and elicit the initial anxiety and psychological discontent. All aggression is targeted at dissonant voices while at the same time, the hypnotized are radically tolerant of the government, corporations and media who communicate the mainstream narrative.'
ca.childrenshealthdefense.org
Accordingly, he says that a “new kind of social bond emerges and a new kind of sense-making.” The sudden switch from lack of connection to a massive social connection leads to a mental intoxication. This intoxicated state, Dr. Desmet says is “what makes mass formation, or crowd formation, the exact equivalent of hypnosis.”
Dr. Desmet emphasizes that it “doesn’t matter anymore whether the narrative is correct or wrong, even blatantly wrong. What matters is that it leads up to this mental intoxication. And that’s why they continue to go along with the narrative, even if they could know by thinking for one second, that it is wrong.”
The official narrative cannot be challenged, or the hypnosis could break and elicit the initial anxiety and psychological discontent. All aggression is targeted at dissonant voices while at the same time, the hypnotized are radically tolerant of the government, corporations and media who communicate the mainstream narrative.'
Mass Formation: Mass Brainwashing? - Children's Health Defense California Chapter
Recently, the term “Mass Formation Psychosis,” or more appropriately “Mass Formation,” emerged to describe today’s unquestioning compliance. This delusional psychosis phenomenon is fear fueled by government, corporations and media colluding together to perpetuate the irrationality. “Without...
ca.childrenshealthdefense.org
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Why? Why do you insist on thinking people don't "understand" just because they argue with you? Why do you insist on trying to convince people to see shit your way?
The problem is Rob that the dollar doesn't have the same buying power from year to year or day to day for that matter which is one of the reason you have to estimate and use averages. We have come to a moment in time were our dollar doesn't buy as much as it did in the past. In 1978 my single dollar would buy almost 2 gallons of gas at $.62 a gallon. Today my dollar will buy less than a 3rd of a gallon of gas. That is the reality of the numbers Rob. So for you to site the numbers you posted and play down what we actually get for out dollar is not relevant to today's prices for products.
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
'Dr. Desmet explains that a strategy for those coping with the constant anxiety is to form a new social connection to battle the object causing fear (death from a virus) with a collective singlemindedness (masks, social distancing and the ultimate weapon, vaccines). “All the anxiety connects to this object [virus] and people are willing to follow the strategy [vaccines] to deal with this object, no matter what the cost.”
Accordingly, he says that a “new kind of social bond emerges and a new kind of sense-making.” The sudden switch from lack of connection to a massive social connection leads to a mental intoxication. This intoxicated state, Dr. Desmet says is “what makes mass formation, or crowd formation, the exact equivalent of hypnosis.”
Dr. Desmet emphasizes that it “doesn’t matter anymore whether the narrative is correct or wrong, even blatantly wrong. What matters is that it leads up to this mental intoxication. And that’s why they continue to go along with the narrative, even if they could know by thinking for one second, that it is wrong.”
The official narrative cannot be challenged, or the hypnosis could break and elicit the initial anxiety and psychological discontent. All aggression is targeted at dissonant voices while at the same time, the hypnotized are radically tolerant of the government, corporations and media who communicate the mainstream narrative.'
Mass Formation: Mass Brainwashing? - Children's Health Defense California Chapter
Recently, the term “Mass Formation Psychosis,” or more appropriately “Mass Formation,” emerged to describe today’s unquestioning compliance. This delusional psychosis phenomenon is fear fueled by government, corporations and media colluding together to perpetuate the irrationality. “Without...
Wow
'This 50-page study, which was published on The Social Science Research Network at the end of August, analyzed CDC and industry-sponsored data on vaccine adverse events, and concluded that mandates for COVID-19 boosters for young people may cause 18 to 98 actual serious adverse events for each COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization theoretically prevented.'
'A look at the currently available data shows that mandates will result in what the authors call a “net expected harm” to young people. This expected harm will exceed the potential benefit from the boosters.'
'The lack of effectiveness of the vaccines is a major concern to these researchers. Based on their analysis of the public data provided to the CDC, they estimated that between 22,000 and 30,000 previously uninfected young adults would need to be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent just a single hospitalization.
However, this estimate does not take into account the protection conferred by a previous infection. So, the authors insisted, “this should be considered a conservative and optimistic assessment of benefit.”
In other words, the mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 are essentially useless.'
When you argue that 2+2=5, you obviously don't understand math.
So you're not confused, I was using that as an example, not saying you actually argued that 2+2=5.
You HAVE argued that averages are not real numbers. "Nefarious" and "lazy", as you described them.
You HAVE argued that you cannot have more than 99% or less than 100% of a large quantity.
You HAVE argued that you cannot calculate a percentage of a number that is not a multiple of 100.
You HAVE argued that a majority cannot be less than 50%.
You HAVE argued that historical numbers are not relevant when discussing increases or decreases.
You HAVE argued that the nominal price of an item is the only thing that matters when discussing price changes over time.
You HAVE argued (and just did) that a dollar in 1978 should buy the same thing it does today.
All incorrect assertions. All examples that you don't understand simple math.
And I'm sure there are plenty more that I haven't seen.
125 million incomes are directly affected byt eh CPI, but the mean "fvck all" in the real world?Yes they mean fck all in the real world...they use data points up to 10 years old to figure current cpi...not to mention its constantly changing...so what the cpi was calculated at in '78 now looks different using today's data points for calculating cpi in 78...
And I don't know anybody in the real world who on.y saw a 10 cent bump in gas since '19...
Interesting.
That's similar to Thxone's argument that the stock market is all just a big scam because he is unable to make money in it and from it, and never has.
Way to ignore the reality around you.
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
When you argue that 2+2=5, you obviously don't understand math.
So you're not confused, I was using that as an example, not saying you actually argued that 2+2=5.
You HAVE argued that averages are not real numbers. "Nefarious" and "lazy", as you described them.
Proves you made up your own opinion of what was actually said which was not this.
You HAVE argued that you cannot have more than 99% or less than 100% of a large quantity.
That was not the argument and I would say you know that but you are stupid.
You HAVE argued that you cannot calculate a percentage of a number that is not a multiple of 100.
This is a distortion of the facts that were discussed and is not accurate to what was said.
You HAVE argued that a majority cannot be less than 50%.
Not once have I engaged in this topic as you have presented it.
You HAVE argued that historical numbers are not relevant when discussing increases or decreases.
I said your post is not relevant to what we are paying at the pump right now.
You HAVE argued that the nominal price of an item is the only thing that matters when discussing price changes over time.
You are the person discussing changes over time. You brought that shit up dumbasss.
You HAVE argued (and just did) that a dollar in 1978 should buy the same thing it does today.
No I didn't.
All incorrect assertions. All examples that you don't understand simple math.
And I'm sure there are plenty more that I haven't seen.
Jesus Christ. Yeah, ok lol. I am convinced that you are out of your mind.
So you're not confused, I was using that as an example, not saying you actually argued that 2+2=5.
You HAVE argued that averages are not real numbers. "Nefarious" and "lazy", as you described them.
Proves you made up your own opinion of what was actually said which was not this.
You HAVE argued that you cannot have more than 99% or less than 100% of a large quantity.
That was not the argument and I would say you know that but you are stupid.
You HAVE argued that you cannot calculate a percentage of a number that is not a multiple of 100.
This is a distortion of the facts that were discussed and is not accurate to what was said.
You HAVE argued that a majority cannot be less than 50%.
Not once have I engaged in this topic as you have presented it.
You HAVE argued that historical numbers are not relevant when discussing increases or decreases.
I said your post is not relevant to what we are paying at the pump right now.
You HAVE argued that the nominal price of an item is the only thing that matters when discussing price changes over time.
You are the person discussing changes over time. You brought that shit up dumbasss.
You HAVE argued (and just did) that a dollar in 1978 should buy the same thing it does today.
No I didn't.
All incorrect assertions. All examples that you don't understand simple math.
And I'm sure there are plenty more that I haven't seen.
Jesus Christ. Yeah, ok lol. I am convinced that you are out of your mind.
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Not one time did I ever say this about the stock market. You love making shit up don't you.
You HAVE argued that averages are not real numbers. "Nefarious" and "lazy", as you described them.
Proves you made up your own opinion of what was actually said which was not this.
Your words, quoted: "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means" "This is what I meant by averages being used by lazy people or for nefarious reasons.'
You HAVE argued that you cannot have more than 99% or less than 100% of a large quantity.
That was not the argument and I would say you know that but you are stupid.
Your words: "How do you vaccinate part of a person. It's like trying to ask a Democrat where the money is really going. Just crickets." In response to a news headline that more than 99% of a very large group had been vaccinated.
You HAVE argued that you cannot calculate a percentage of a number that is not a multiple of 100.
This is a distortion of the facts that were discussed and is not accurate to what was said.
Your words: "It isn't your strong suit either genius... where are the 10 brown M&M's??? You only counted 90."(When I tried to explain a majority doesn't have to be over 50% by using 90 M&M candies of various colors.)
You HAVE argued that a majority cannot be less than 50%.
Not once have I engaged in this topic as you have presented it.
Your words: "41% is not all Republicans. Looks to me like less than half by your quoted stats." (You were trying to counter the idea that if 41% of antivaxers are Republican, they can actually represent a majority)
You HAVE argued that historical numbers are not relevant when discussing increases or decreases.
I said your post is not relevant to what we are paying at the pump right now.
Your words: "Do you think, Rob, that anyone gives a shit about cost over time or what something cost 40 years ago over what they are paying right now, TODAY'S prices." "Go live in the past and continue thinking it has any relevance to what people are paying in actual money right now."
You HAVE argued that the nominal price of an item is the only thing that matters when discussing price changes over time.
You are the person discussing changes over time. You brought that shit up dumbasss.
I guess "nominal price" threw you on this one. Your reply is not relevant to nominal price, but it's comical that you think time is irrelevant with regard to change.
You HAVE argued (and just did) that a dollar in 1978 should buy the same thing it does today.
No I didn't.
Your words: "In 1978 my single dollar would buy almost 2 gallons of gas at $.62 a gallon. Today my dollar will buy less than a 3rd of a gallon of gas. That is the reality of the numbers Rob." Completely ignoring all of the other numbers that have changed along with the dropping gas prices.
All incorrect assertions. All examples that you don't understand simple math.
And I'm sure there are plenty more that I haven't seen.
Jesus Christ. Yeah, ok lol. I am convinced that you are out of your mind.
You are arguing simple math concepts that you don't even understand and refuting you said things that I am able to quote in seconds, but I'M the one who is out of his mind? Hahahaha, a Monday morning funny. Good on you.
With regards to making money on stocks, your words: "I don't care how I leave the planet for these idiots when I die yet you will speak happily about your market profits you claim to make as people struggle and suffer with this inflation while you profit from their plight. THAT is why you are a piece of shit"
How is making money on stocks being a piece of shit who is "profiting from" people's "plight"?
Proves you made up your own opinion of what was actually said which was not this.
Your words, quoted: "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means" "This is what I meant by averages being used by lazy people or for nefarious reasons.'
You HAVE argued that you cannot have more than 99% or less than 100% of a large quantity.
That was not the argument and I would say you know that but you are stupid.
Your words: "How do you vaccinate part of a person. It's like trying to ask a Democrat where the money is really going. Just crickets." In response to a news headline that more than 99% of a very large group had been vaccinated.
You HAVE argued that you cannot calculate a percentage of a number that is not a multiple of 100.
This is a distortion of the facts that were discussed and is not accurate to what was said.
Your words: "It isn't your strong suit either genius... where are the 10 brown M&M's??? You only counted 90."(When I tried to explain a majority doesn't have to be over 50% by using 90 M&M candies of various colors.)
You HAVE argued that a majority cannot be less than 50%.
Not once have I engaged in this topic as you have presented it.
Your words: "41% is not all Republicans. Looks to me like less than half by your quoted stats." (You were trying to counter the idea that if 41% of antivaxers are Republican, they can actually represent a majority)
You HAVE argued that historical numbers are not relevant when discussing increases or decreases.
I said your post is not relevant to what we are paying at the pump right now.
Your words: "Do you think, Rob, that anyone gives a shit about cost over time or what something cost 40 years ago over what they are paying right now, TODAY'S prices." "Go live in the past and continue thinking it has any relevance to what people are paying in actual money right now."
You HAVE argued that the nominal price of an item is the only thing that matters when discussing price changes over time.
You are the person discussing changes over time. You brought that shit up dumbasss.
I guess "nominal price" threw you on this one. Your reply is not relevant to nominal price, but it's comical that you think time is irrelevant with regard to change.
You HAVE argued (and just did) that a dollar in 1978 should buy the same thing it does today.
No I didn't.
Your words: "In 1978 my single dollar would buy almost 2 gallons of gas at $.62 a gallon. Today my dollar will buy less than a 3rd of a gallon of gas. That is the reality of the numbers Rob." Completely ignoring all of the other numbers that have changed along with the dropping gas prices.
All incorrect assertions. All examples that you don't understand simple math.
And I'm sure there are plenty more that I haven't seen.
Jesus Christ. Yeah, ok lol. I am convinced that you are out of your mind.
You are arguing simple math concepts that you don't even understand and refuting you said things that I am able to quote in seconds, but I'M the one who is out of his mind? Hahahaha, a Monday morning funny. Good on you.
With regards to making money on stocks, your words: "I don't care how I leave the planet for these idiots when I die yet you will speak happily about your market profits you claim to make as people struggle and suffer with this inflation while you profit from their plight. THAT is why you are a piece of shit"
How is making money on stocks being a piece of shit who is "profiting from" people's "plight"?
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Hahahaha. More ad hominem after you are proved wrong for the umpteenth time. Don't you love it when you claim "I didn't say that" and then the quotes show you INDEED said it?
You are like a human punching bag. Glutton for punishment. Maybe you get off on it.
Do you call those 1-900 lines where they tell you that you are garbage for $5.99 a minute?
Last edited:
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
How can you prove me wrong. You are arguing your own opinions and take on what was argued originally. You are arguing against yourself. You can't prove me wrong if you are arguing against yourself. If you actually argued what was said and not your take on what you thought was said you might be able to stand and argue... but this is not what you did or do.
Now say a bunch of dumb shit to make people think you accomplished something or proved a point you never actually had. Idiot.
Can you use the word argue a few more times? You are so wound up, you aren't even makin sense any more. Take your Adderall
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Can you prove an actual fact? One not based on your feelings or the use of Google?
- Status
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
About this thread
- Start date
- Participants
- Who Replied
- Replies
- 19,273
- Views
- 804,179
- Last reply date
- Last reply from
- administrator
