Winners only.

[ThxOne Premium Member]

To be fair, you said a full video stream of the events leading up to and including the events at the Capitol on Jan 6th was not acceptable evidence because your weren't there to actually witness it.

This seems like a selective application based on the situation. You mention "court of law" and that you can't convict based on feelings (incorrect), but when it comes to law and evidence, you shouldn't be selectively applying evidentiary analyses based on your opinion of the perp or the victim.

You have made it very clear that you think women who have *** are sluts and that women will lie about **** to get a man in trouble. Due to that, you refuse to believe a **** victim without witnessing the ****. You did make this claim, and now you say you will accept video evidence.
Why would you not accept video evidence of what happened on Jan 6th?

Sure, I will bite. Because I saw unedited videos of Jan 6th and edited video of Jan 6th. Both used by the media. One, the edited videos, clearly were used to bash Trump. That is why I will deny the Jan 6th Videos. A random CCTV video of someone being ***** doesn't have an agenda attached to the video.

To be fair? Really... how about just being unbiased and thinking rationally while using common sense?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Big tech takeover, election meddling, censoring the free speech of Americans:

'Alphabet Inc.’s Google, Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc. and their trade groups have poured almost $95 million into lobbying since 2021 as they seek to derail the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, which has advanced further than any US legislative effort to address the market power of some of the world’s richest companies.'

'Although clipping the wings of tech giants through antitrust reform had support from both Republicans and Democrats during this Congress, a likely GOP majority in the House next year is expected to focus on allegations that internet platforms squelch conservative viewpoints.'

Big Tech’s $95 Million Spending Spree Leaves Antitrust Bill on Brink of Defeat

A high-profile push by Congress to rein in the nation’s biggest internet companies is at risk of failing with time running out to pass major legislation ahead of midterm elections.

www.bloomberg.com

Pro-technology cult is taking over the world

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The people told the police that he he just shot people and the police did nothing. We will never know if the crowd was trying to detain him or kill him. Did Rosenbaum ever punch Rittenhouse like he did the little girl? Again with the "I'll kill you" talk. Do you not realize how many times that is said on a daily basis? If everybody who said I'll kill you got shot and killed then the streets would be littered with bodies and you know it. Are you taking things literal now? The same thing that people get on me about. It fits your narrative to take Rosenbaums words literal in this instance.

There is a difference between "I'll kill you" which does get uttered all the time and "If I catch you alone, I'll kill you" and then catching that person alone and aggressively charging the person you threaten. Context matters....

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Sure, I will bite. Because I saw unedited videos of Jan 6th and edited video of Jan 6th. Both used by the media. One, the edited videos, clearly were used to bash Trump. That is why I will deny the Jan 6th Videos. A random CCTV video of someone being ***** doesn't have an agenda attached to the video.

To be fair? Really... how about just being unbiased and thinking rationally while using common sense?

Because the video link I offered was basically a feature-length eyewitness style video. it was not a bunch of few-second clips mashed together to make a narrative.

I get what you're pushing for the "random CCTV" video, but most of those are utter shit compared to the GoPro and news camera footage that exists of January 6th. Maybe "random CCTV" footage is not the best comparison to offer as a good source of evidence in discussing something. Go with cellphone footage as your analogy, maybe.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Because the video link I offered was basically a feature-length eyewitness style video. it was not a bunch of few-second clips mashed together to make a narrative.

I get what you're pushing for the "random CCTV" video, but most of those are utter shit compared to the GoPro and news camera footage that exists of January 6th. Maybe "random CCTV" footage is not the best comparison to offer as a good source of evidence in discussing something. Go with cellphone footage as your analogy, maybe.

I am not familiar with the video link you posted... or if I saw it, It may have slipped my memory.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Sure, I will bite. Because I saw unedited videos of Jan 6th and edited video of Jan 6th. Both used by the media. One, the edited videos, clearly were used to bash Trump. That is why I will deny the Jan 6th Videos. A random CCTV video of someone being ***** doesn't have an agenda attached to the video.

To be fair? Really... how about just being unbiased and thinking rationally while using common sense?

Certainly the videos were editted to show the "juicy parts." Can you explain what was editted out that could possibly justify the action of the Jan 6 rioters or put Trump in "less negative" light? What facts and evidence am I missing?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Certainly the videos were editted to show the "juicy parts." Can you explain what was editted out that could possibly justify the action of the Jan 6 rioters or put Trump in "less negative" light? What facts and evidence am I missing?

I could and it has been done many times. Am I going to, no.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I could and it has been done many times. Am I going to, no.

I'm going to guess the videos (like police letting protesters in) were also carefully edited and there really isn't anyway to put Jan 6th in a good light. The right got their panties in a bunch because they lost an election and stormed the capitol, it's as simple as that.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Yeah, he's a tool. You do understand that 2 things can be true at once right Bobby?

We'll see....

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I'm going to guess the videos (like police letting protesters in) were also carefully edited and there really isn't anyway to put Jan 6th in a good light. The right got their panties in a bunch because they lost an election and stormed the capitol, it's as simple as that.

If only it were that simple. I think a group of simple minded people were manipulated into entering the building by instigators. Simple as that.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

If only it were that simple. I think a group of simple minded people were manipulated into entering the building by instigators. Simple as that.

That's exactly what happened and the instigators are getting longer sentences. Whether it's Jan 6 or BLM/ Kenosha, there is always instigators at a riot.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

lol idiot

It's hard to come back with an intelligent thought when you are faced with facts. The typical Republican response is to resort to name calling. "Kill the messenger" kid.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

We have been over this before. If you ignore it again you are on your own.

Undeniable proof - Video evidence of a person clearly forcing another person to have ***. I said I will not CONVICT a person of **** just because someone says that person ***** them. <---- I know this rational thinking is foreign to you but I promise, it is essential in a court of law. Can't convict based on your emotions even though you are still arguing with them several weeks later about Kyle.

I knocked my sister out. Not a random woman on the street. My sister. It was a family matter and she also struck me with a closed fist, in the face, first. When it comes to my sister there is no gender. She'd beat your asss I promise and she beat my Uncles asss once. She's scrappy. My ex-girlfriend threw a full can of food at me and hit me in the chest with it. I lifted her off the ground by her armpits and held her to the wall and told her quote, She would not do that again. I let her down, no hitting involved.

Read it, retain it, understand it. Got it?

Video proof of a ****? You are lost man. Rapists don't film their crime. Come back to reality.