Winners only.

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You're talking to a guy who knocked his own sister out. He has no problem beating girls/women. He doesn't believe in **** unless there is a video of it.

Those are inaccurate statements. I wish you could get it in your head to not be a diick just because people don't live like you do.

I have a huge problem with people hitting women.

I 100% believe **** happens. I said I will not convict someone based on the word of another. If there is undeniable PROOF, then that is a different case.

Stop being an assshole because you choose to be closed minded.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I've clocked a few kids who went after my little brother, but never a girl. Kyle should have pulled her off rather than sucker punch her from behind. What a tool.

I don't disagree.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

yes. he killed two people who deserved to be killed.



you said killer denoting that he is a murder. This is just your idiot way of trying to apply rational to the words you mince.



i don't know if they would be alive today. considering the way they acted like out of control animals, there is a good chance they would have been shot and killed by someone else by now.



He used the force necessary to neutralize a threat from 3 thugs.

Seems pretty damn rational to me.

Idiot

They acted out of control just like Rittenhouse did when he sucker punched that little girl. He's lucky he didn't get killed that day. He will always be a killer. Always! Once somebody kills somebody they will forever be a killer. I didn't denote anything. I said he was a killer and he is and always will be.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Those are inaccurate statements. I wish you could get it in your head to not be a diick just because people don't live like you do.

I have a huge problem with people hitting women.

I 100% believe **** happens. I said I will not convict someone based on the word of another. If there is undeniable PROOF, then that is a different case.

Stop being an assshole because you choose to be closed minded.

What is undeniable proof in your mind? Did you knock your own sister out? You said if a woman says that she has been ***** that you wouldn't believe her.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Once somebody kills somebody they will forever be a killer

So our veterans are killers?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

So our veterans are killers?

Trained killers or assassins. Call them what you want. Haven't you ever heard a veteran say that they had a hard time killing people and they have to live with it everyday for the rest of their lives?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

I don't disagree.

You agree that Rittenhouse is a tool?

 

[Kayge 10+ year member]

They acted out of control just like Rittenhouse did when he sucker punched that little girl. He's lucky he didn't get killed that day. He will always be a killer. Always! Once somebody kills somebody they will forever be a killer. I didn't denote anything. I said he was a killer and he is and always will be.

lol idiot

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Biden already forgot about his massive anti-MAGA speech he gave. Wow, what a tool

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Biden already forgot about his massive anti-MAGA speech he gave. Wow, what a tool

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I have to agree with Trump here:

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

It’s getting quite heated:

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

What is undeniable proof in your mind? Did you knock your own sister out? You said if a woman says that she has been ***** that you wouldn't believe her.

We have been over this before. If you ignore it again you are on your own.

Undeniable proof - Video evidence of a person clearly forcing another person to have ***. I said I will not CONVICT a person of **** just because someone says that person ***** them. <---- I know this rational thinking is foreign to you but I promise, it is essential in a court of law. Can't convict based on your emotions even though you are still arguing with them several weeks later about Kyle.

I knocked my sister out. Not a random woman on the street. My sister. It was a family matter and she also struck me with a closed fist, in the face, first. When it comes to my sister there is no gender. She'd beat your asss I promise and she beat my Uncles asss once. She's scrappy. My ex-girlfriend threw a full can of food at me and hit me in the chest with it. I lifted her off the ground by her armpits and held her to the wall and told her quote, She would not do that again. I let her down, no hitting involved.

Read it, retain it, understand it. Got it?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You agree that Rittenhouse is a tool?

Yeah, he's a tool. You do understand that 2 things can be true at once right Bobby?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

We have been over this before. If you ignore it again you are on your own.

Undeniable proof - Video evidence of a person clearly forcing another person to have ***. I said I will not CONVICT a person of **** just because someone says that person ***** them. <---- I know this rational thinking is foreign to you but I promise, it is essential in a court of law. Can't convict based on your emotions even though you are still arguing with them several weeks later about Kyle.

I knocked my sister out. Not a random woman on the street. My sister. It was a family matter and she also struck me with a closed fist, in the face, first. When it comes to my sister there is no gender. She'd beat your asss I promise and she beat my Uncles asss once. She's scrappy. My ex-girlfriend threw a full can of food at me and hit me in the chest with it. I lifted her off the ground by her armpits and held her to the wall and told her quote, She would not do that again. I let her down, no hitting involved.

Read it, retain it, understand it. Got it?

To be fair, you said a full video stream of the events leading up to and including the events at the Capitol on Jan 6th was not acceptable evidence because your weren't there to actually witness it.

This seems like a selective application based on the situation. You mention "court of law" and that you can't convict based on feelings (incorrect), but when it comes to law and evidence, you shouldn't be selectively applying evidentiary analyses based on your opinion of the perp or the victim.

You have made it very clear that you think women who have *** are sluts and that women will lie about **** to get a man in trouble. Due to that, you refuse to believe a **** victim without witnessing the ****. You did make this claim, and now you say you will accept video evidence.
Why would you not accept video evidence of what happened on Jan 6th?