Winners only.

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

That's not what he said. At least quote him correctly and say that he apologized for saying it.

View attachment 41989

Same fckn difference...if nitpicking is all you got...pack it in

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Same fckn difference...if nitpicking is all you got...pack it in

Nice spin on his words. He still apologized. Please name one time that your cult leader Trump apologized in his life? Just once.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Nice spin on his words. He still apologized. Please name one time that your cult leader Trump apologized in his life? Just once.

An apology doesn't forgive an unacceptable statement imo...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

An apology doesn't forgive an unacceptable statement imo...

Like Trump saying that he wanted people killed who were innocent? What about admitting to not renting to blacks? He did that to. He promised not to discriminate anymore against black people. And you forgive all of that. Interesting.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Like Trump saying that he wanted people killed who were innocent? What about admitting to not renting to blacks? He did that to. He promised not to discriminate anymore against black people. And you forgive all of that. Interesting.

I'm not excusing him for that either...but you're in the same boat about Rittenhouse...so glass house and all that...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

I'm not excusing him for that either...but you're in the same boat about Rittenhouse...so glass house and all that...

Rittenhouse is getting paid for people talking. Being found not guilty is different than being acquitted of all charges. You know that.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Rittenhouse is getting for people talking. Being found not guilty is different than being acquitted of all charges. You know that.

Same situation...innocent person (declared by law) somebody thinking they're still guilty...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Same situation...innocent person (declared by law) somebody thinking they're still guilty...

Answer the question then. Do you think OJ didn't do it?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Oj absolutely did it...but that has no bearing on Rittenhouse...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Oj absolutely did it...but that has no bearing on Rittenhouse...

Overwhelming evidence and found not guilty. Would you let Rittenhouse or OJ babysit your kids?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Overwhelming evidence and found not guilty. Would you let Rittenhouse or OJ babysit your kids?

Neither or anybody else I don't know on personal level...

There's plenty of video in the Rittenhouse case that shows he was assaulted first...there's zero footage for oj...outside hiding in the back of a bronco on the freeway...so yeah...oj has no bearing on the Rittenhouse case...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Neither or anybody else I don't know on personal level...

There's plenty of video in the Rittenhouse case that shows he was assaulted first...there's zero footage for oj...outside hiding in the back of a bronco on the freeway...so yeah...oj has no bearing on the Rittenhouse case...

Not with the first Rittenhouse murder. Please provide proof that he was assaulted first in the first shooting. I'll wait.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Neither or anybody else I don't know on personal level...

There's plenty of video in the Rittenhouse case that shows he was assaulted first...there's zero footage for oj...outside hiding in the back of a bronco on the freeway...so yeah...oj has no bearing on the Rittenhouse case...

There is also zero evidence that OJ reacted in self defense. Is that what you are saying?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Neither or anybody else I don't know on personal level...

There's plenty of video in the Rittenhouse case that shows he was assaulted first...there's zero footage for oj...outside hiding in the back of a bronco on the freeway...so yeah...oj has no bearing on the Rittenhouse case...

There was DNA evidence that OJ did it. Are you completely ignoring that? Do you really think that OJ didn't do it?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

There is also zero evidence that OJ reacted in self defense. Is that what you are saying?

There is zero evidence that OJ should even be there but he was. Shoes, shoe size, blood, DNA, timeline, Kato, socks, etc..... You can let OJ off all you want for murdering two people but it happened and deep down you know it happened. Please call me a liar.