Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m asking how it is different connecting them both to one set of terminals versus connecting each one to each set of terminals.

It was said it was ok to use one set and then went on to explain what would happen if BOTH sets got used.

What’s the difference?
Monoblock with two positives and two negatives. The positives are connected internally as are the negatives. In my case I have two dual 4 ohm subwoofers and each subwoofer is wired down to 2 ohms at the terminals on opposite sides of the enclosure. Instead of having to shove 4 - 10awg wires into two terminals, I can simply wire one sub into terminal A and the other into B. Since these are bridged internally inside the amplifier I now have a 1 ohm final load at the amp.
 
Monoblock with two positives and two negatives. The positives are connected internally as are the negatives. In my case I have two dual 4 ohm subwoofers and each subwoofer is wired down to 2 ohms at the terminals on opposite sides of the enclosure. Instead of having to shove 4 - 10awg wires into two terminals, I can simply wire one sub into terminal A and the other into B. Since these are bridged internally inside the amplifier I now have a 1 ohm final load at the amp.
The point was that Spokey described wiring each sub to each set of terminals as if it was different than wiring both subs to just one set of terminals.
(paraphrasing) “It’s ok to use one set but if you use both sets, THIS will happen”.

I can picture him wanting a volume knob that goes to eleven…
 
And your boy Trump ran the deficit up $7.8 trillion and you are fine with that. You are a joke. So hypocritical.
You sure about this?

I am looking at monthly federal deficit numbers and it sure looks like comparing the numbers under Biden when he took office are higher than Trumps from the same months the year before.

This chart here seems to show it is getting worse under Biden.
 

Attachments

  • Monthly-deficit-February-2021-5.jpg
    Monthly-deficit-February-2021-5.jpg
    19.4 KB · Views: 11
  • july-2022-mts-chart-5.jpg
    july-2022-mts-chart-5.jpg
    45 KB · Views: 12
You sure about this?

I am looking at monthly federal deficit numbers and it sure looks like comparing the numbers under Biden when he took office are higher than Trumps from the same months the year before.

This chart here seems to show it is getting worse under Biden.
That chart seems to show a gradual increase, then a huge spike under Trump, then back to a gradual increase.
Am I reading I’m the dates wrong?
 
What are they saying? Trump’s attorney said they watched it all from (?)NYC.
The people at CNN are confused and worried because they won't release the CCTV footage yet so they are basically talking trash. "If Trump had anything he would have released the videos already because Trump doesn't listen to anyone or his lawyers" Maybe this and maybe that. It pretty funny.
 
No, you are reading it right. That spike corresponds with what though? Do you see Biden reducing it? Nope, it is steadily rising, slowly like lava.
The deficit will always rise.
The real question is how do Trumpets reconcile their complaints about Biden increasing the deficit when it increased far faster under Trump? Or in this case, that Biden isn’t reducing it?

‘Seems to be an entirely selective source fiscal “morality”.
Much like the Republicans who griped that Obama didn’t fix the economy FAST ENOUGH after it collapsed under Bush. They’d probably bltch if you strangled them with a used rope.

Interesting that 3:4 of the POTUSes with the highest deficits were Republican.
 
Last edited:
The deficit will always rise.
The real question is how do Trumpets reconcile their complaints about Biden increasing the deficit when it increased far faster under Trump?

‘Seems to be an entirely selective source fiscal “morality”.
Much like the Republicans who griped that Obama didn’t fix the economy FAST ENOUGH after it collapsed under Bush. They’d probably ***** if you strangled them with a used rope.
Are you going to ignore the second picture where it shows another sharp rise only this time it's under Biden... just going to glass over that one huh? I like how you don't mention what the first spike corresponds with under Trump. I know, it makes it easier for libertards to say he did a bad job. What's Biden's excuse? His may be rising slower but it's rising and it's much higher than Trump's. Isn't it?
 
Are you going to ignore the second picture where it shows another sharp rise only this time it's under Biden... just going to glass over that one huh? I like how you don't mention what the first spike corresponds with under Trump. I know, it makes it easier for libertards to say he did a bad job. What's Biden's excuse? His may be rising slower but it's rising and it's much higher than Trump's. Isn't it?
I see it, but it pales compared to the singular spike under Trump. And here’s the kicker: It basically QUADRUPLED during Trump’s four years, and then DROPPED in Biden’s first year.

Didn’t you say you were upset that Biden did nothing to reduce it?
Are you trying to glass over that by complaining it never happened?
Isn’t a deficit reduction under Biden a GOOD thing? Isn’t debt reduction under Biden a good thing?

These are deficit numbers in billions.
Column two is debt in billions.

8E3E4D52-9DB3-40AD-9D8B-17650E89D773.jpeg

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,117,037
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_2118.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top