Winners only.

[ThxOne Premium Member]

how can you accuse them of burning evidence if you don;t think the documents exist?
You just flip-flopped yet again.

So, do you think Trump's attorney just blindly signed a receipt for Top Secret documents that were never really in his home, and never really seized from his home?

Yes, or no?

Hey Rob.... you have to stop throwing comprehension out the door. It's important. Well, to people who can comprehend.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I swear Rob and Bobby just don't read anything.

For like the 50th time Rob the Dumbasss, Documents exist, allegedly they are top secret or classified. Roll the window down and let in some fresh air before you pass out. Dummy.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Why would I say keep telling yourself that about what I posted... it was about your comment. You know, THIS PART.

"Incorrect, but how you described it." Fucking simp.

Describing an oil change bill like a congressional bill is not only childish, it's incorrect.
I don't need to "tell myself" that, it's a simple fact.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Describing an oil change bill like a congressional bill is not only childish, it's incorrect.
I don't need to "tell myself" that, it's a simple fact.

That's your opinion, no matter how wrong it is.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I swear Rob and Bobby just don't read anything.
For like the 50th time Rob the Dumbasss, Documents exist, allegedly they are top secret or classified. Roll the window down and let in some fresh air before you pass out. Dummy.

There is written proof signed by Trump's attorney that proves some of the documents were Top Secret.
This is not an "allegation" it is a proof.
Do you not understand what the word "alleged" even means. Do you consider it only "alleged" that the Washington Monument is in D.C. since you have never been there and have only seen pictures and read claims?

Or, are you doing anything you possibly can to not admit what you have so desperately tried to deny all along?

My guess is the latter.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

There is written proof signed by Trump's attorney that proves some of the documents were Top Secret.
This is not an "allegation" is it a proof.
Do you not understand what the word "alleged" even means. Do you consider it only "alleged" that the Washington Monument is in D.C. since you have never been there and have only seen pictures and read claims?

Or, are you doing anything you possibly can to not admit what you have so desperately tried to deny all along?

My guess is the latter.

You can keep wasting time going round and round. There are documents. Allegedly they are top secret or Classified. Google the word. I say Google because Google uses definitions from Oxford

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You can keep wasting time going round and round. There are documents. Allegedly they are top secret or Classified. Google the word. I say Google because Google uses definitions from Oxford

Maybe YOU should Google the defintion:
Alleged - (of an incident or a person) said, without proof, to have taken place or to have a specified illegal or undesirable quality.

Except the proof exists. It's in the receipt that the attorney signed. The receipt lists Top Secret documents. Trump giving him the power to do that means Trump is liable for his actions. Ergo, TRUMP acknowledged some of the documents removed were TOP SECRET.

So, "mass mail-in vote fraud" is ALLEGED because there is no PROOF, of it but the Top Secret docs found at Mara Lago are not "alleged" because there is PROOF they exist and were there.

Isn't it crazy how that works if you actually understand the meanings of the words you use?
Your spin attempts have failed. Again.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Maybe YOU should Google the defintion:
Alleged - (of an incident or a person) said, without proof, to have taken place or to have a specified illegal or undesirable quality.

Except the proof exists. It's in the receipt that the attorney signed. The receipt lists Top Secret documents. Trump giving him the power to do that means Trump is liable for his actions. Ergo, TRUMP acknowledged some of the documents removed were TOP SECRET.

So, "mass mail-in vote fraud" is ALLEGED because there is no PROOF, of it but the Top Secret docs found at Mara Lago are not "alleged" because there is PROOF they exist and were there.

Isn't it crazy how that works if you actually understand the meanings of the words you use?
Your spin attempts have failed. Again.

Allegedly proof exist. Again, the list can say anything. The fact that the FBI, I am assuming, made the list means they will now have to produce these documents as evidence. Like I said, I hope the left isn't exposed.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Allegedly proof exist. Again, the list can say anything. The fact that the FBI, I am assuming, made the list means they will now have to produce these documents as evidence. Like I said, I hope the left isn't exposed.

Wow. You must have taken a KoolAid enema to hang onto the “alleged” bullshlt so long and so firmly.

A nickel bet says you will never believe the docs exist unless you lay hands on them yourself?

The fact that people like you exist in volume is genuinely fvcking scary.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Rob still hasn't explained how to bridge a monoblock...inquiring mind just gotta know

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Wow. You must have taken a KoolAid enema to hang onto the “alleged” bullshlt so long and so firmly.

A nickel bet says you will never believe the docs exist unless you lay hands on them yourself?

The fact that people like you exist in volume is genuinely fvcking scary.

I will bet a nickle that you are stupid, ignorant and can't retain information you have read. I mean shit, how many times can I say the documents exist??? I have said it several times... do I need to bash you on the head before you retain that information. What is alleged is that they are top secret or classified. Let me know when you retain that information so you can then go eat your own diick. Dumbasss.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Rob still hasn't explained how to bridge a monoblock...inquiring mind just gotta know

I mean shit.... look at my amp. The speaker terminals are not speaker INPUTS.... they are speaker OUTPUTS and look at that, there are two positives and two negatives on this MONOBLOCK AMP.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I mean shit.... look at my amp. The speaker terminals are not speaker INPUTS.... they are speaker OUTPUTS and look at that, there are two positives and two negatives on this MONOBLOCK AMP.

Gotta bridge it or lose half the power

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rob still hasn't explained how to bridge a monoblock...inquiring mind just gotta know

Show us all where I claimed you can, and I will gladly explain the possibilities.

Meanwhile, I already showed how you think hooking up two subs to a single set of terminals on that mono amp is different from using two sets of terminals.
Why don’t you back up what you say?
Can’t do it?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I mean shit.... look at my amp. The speaker terminals are not speaker INPUTS.... they are speaker OUTPUTS and look at that, there are two positives and two negatives on this MONOBLOCK AMP.

So tell us, are there two OUTPUTS on a mono amp?

Ask Spokey about connecting the subs to a load…