Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Show me Biden's hypocrisy and I'll say I dislike it.

lets start with a simple ones . . . and no, i am not going to link everything, so don't ask.

Biden attacked Trumps character in regards to the affairs he was having with other women... yet, Biden was having an affair with Jill when she was still married to Bill Stevenson.

Biden claimed he no longer supported the Hyde Amendment that bans federal funding for most abortions, but then flipped as soon as he got backlash

Biden argued China didn't pose a serious threat to US and that Trump was wrong for being tough on them . .. now he says we are in competition with China and we need to get tough on them

in the mid 90's Biden used to gush over Barr... but as soon as he got nominated by Trump he called for Barr to resign

in the mid 90's Biden VOTED for the Defense of Marriage Act which banned federal recognition of same *** marriage. . . now he says that the movement for ****** rights is the "civil issue of our time"

then we have guns. . . Biden used to claim to be a strong supporter of the second amendment and voted with the NRA on the Firearms Owners Protection Act... then as soon as he becomes senator and the left starts taking aggressive stances on gun control... ole Joey follows the heard

seems like a pretty disingenuous person to me
 
Even if he pled once and it tool 4 seconds, he is still a massively loud-mouthed hypocrite who is all talk and no walk.
Should stick to his guns or never have flapped his gums.

i mean, as much as you want him to vomit from the mouth and say something incriminating... i think hes getting pretty good advice from his lawyers right now
 
Last edited:
You seem scared of the English language, but I am not afraid of someone based on their sexuality. Why are you afraid of homosexuals. Latent feelings that scare you?

Sorry, but a "claim is a claim is a claim" is not how it works. You make the initial unfounded claim, and it's automatically bullshit until you prove it.
Here's how my claim that yours is bullshit is substantiated: "When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo"
There, my conterclaim is proved. Now prove your initial claim.

Thirty posts later and you still can't prove a fekking thing, so you want to try to change the argument to whether "burden of proof" is a real concept, and whether it applies to your entitled self.
Painted yourself into yet another corner of logic failure.

Even the other guys here who would back you up just to be contrary to me are staying away from your train wreck of an argument, lol
Look at you, still trying to make rules for people to play your game by. No, Rob, that is not how life works. You going to prove there was no significant voter fraud or not? You going to prove that democrats didn't release covid so they could use mail in voting to their advantage or do you concede? You wont because you can't. You fail a debating unless you can Google your answers. Figures.
 
When I can back up what I say, I stick to my guns. Unlike you, who sticks to them no matter how wrong you are, and how many times you have been proved wrong.
No, you picked a political side that has an answer for everything because they are so unethical. You never stopped to ask why there is so much information put out there by the left did you? Because people who are full of shit have to try to convince you they are right. You go right on "backing up what you say".
 
No, you picked a political side that has an answer for everything because they are so unethical. You never stopped to ask why there is so much information put out there by the left did you? Because people who are full of shit have to try to convince you they are right. You go right on "backing up what you say".
You think the "left" created the Burden of Proof concept?

And so here we are, with you blaming the left because you can't support your claim of mail-in vote fraud and the "release of COVID" by Democrats.
All of that time posting bullshit when you simply could have said "I have no proof". But that's tough after saying a **** hasn't happened unless you witness it.

Suddenly, you find proof is not important when your narrative is in jeopardy.
Funny how that works, huh?
 
You think the "left" created the Burden of Proof concept?

This was never even brought up by me. Irrelevant.


And so here we are, with you blaming the left because you can't support your claim of mail-in vote fraud and the "release of COVID" by Democrats.
All of that time posting bullshit when you simply could have said "I have no proof". But that's tough after saying a **** hasn't happened unless you witness it.

No, we are here because YOU can't support your claim that there was no voter fraud... and the COVID thing. Listen here Mr. One track mind. I have as much proof as you have of the opposite of my claim. This makes your post just as much bullshit as mine.

Suddenly, you find proof is not important when your narrative is in jeopardy.
Funny how that works, huh?

Right back at ya.
 
Even the other guys here who would back you up just to be contrary to me are staying away from your train wreck of an argument, lol
Trying to make me feel alone... separated from the group so I will be afraid and will finally admit the errors of my way and beg for you to join YOUR cult. Nah... you are an idiot. Stick to your life of filling out online surveys for cash and gift cards and Google fact checking. You have no powers here.
 
Trying to make me feel alone... separated from the group so I will be afraid and will finally admit the errors of my way and beg for you to join YOUR cult. Nah... you are an idiot. Stick to your life of filling out online surveys for cash and gift cards and Google fact checking. You have no powers here.
Nope. Just stating the fact that no one will back you up on this. The logical conclusion is they are distancing themselves b/c backing you up would be a fool's folly.

Maybe we should try to prove the logical conclusion.
 
Nope. Just stating the fact that no one will back you up on this. The logical conclusion is they are distancing themselves b/c backing you up would be a fool's folly.

Maybe we should try to prove the logical conclusion.
Ok, let me help.

NOBODY BACK ME UP. PLEASE IGNORE ROB SPEAKING FOR YOU AS AN INVITE TO HELP ME IN SOME WAY. APPARENTLY HE HAS ME IN A CORNER AND I AM SURROUNDED BY TOXIC PAINT. THIS IS NOT A PLEA FOR HELP!!!!
 
Nope. Just stating the fact that no one will back you up on this. The logical conclusion is they are distancing themselves b/c backing you up would be a fool's folly.

Maybe we should try to prove the logical conclusion.
Is this because I have more liquid cash in my bank than you do? Is it my larger Johnson Rod? Is it because I don't let you or the left tell me what to think? Is it because I didn't vote for Biden but a simple investigation would show I voted for him like 37 times? You tell me Rob.
 
Ok, let me help.

NOBODY BACK ME UP. PLEASE IGNORE ROB SPEAKING FOR YOU AS AN INVITE TO HELP ME IN SOME WAY. APPARENTLY HE HAS ME IN A CORNER AND I AM SURROUNDED BY TOXIC PAINT. THIS IS NOT A PLEA FOR HELP!!!!
Hahaha. That is more desperate than if you actually asked for them to help you.

Let's make it simple: Who on the thread thinks Thxone's claims should be accepted without the existence of prior evidence, without him being able to PRODUCE evidence, and that the concept of Burden of Proof does not apply to him because he is entitled and special?
 
Is this because I have more liquid cash in my bank than you do? Is it my larger Johnson Rod? Is it because I don't let you or the left tell me what to think? Is it because I didn't vote for Biden but a simple investigation would show I voted for him like 37 times? You tell me Rob.

Wow, doing anything you can to steer attention away from your constant lack of ability to back up any of your claims, huh? How desperate can you be?
Just admit you have NOTHING and move on, instead of continuing to look like a pathetic dummy.

Or...prove your claims from ae least as far back as April that the Democrats "released COVID" and that it was done to effect the election of Biden through mail-in "voter fraud".

"Liquid cash" HAHAHAHA. As opposed to "illiquid cash"? Stop talking about things you don't understand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,108,546
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top