Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Repeating things you say and thoughts you express is not "speaking for you".
YOU stated pot is not a drug. YOU stated the vax doesn't work. I simply repeated those things.
If "hearing" your own stuff repeated back to you makes things difficult, then you may want to reconsider posting them?



Still stuck on the homophobia. So, unable to handle a truce on the insults?
Eat a diick Rob, eat.... a..... diick.

I 100% did say those words... however, you have left off the rest of the statements included with those words. The other words that give it context. Part of the liberal playbook? Your statement would be correct if you actually did the things you just claimed. "Repeating things you say" If you are going to do this then repeat EVERYTHING that was said. When you TELL ME WHAT I MEANT then YOU ARE SPEAKING FOR ME. It is very concerning that you don't know the difference.
 
‘The Navy has been working on robotic warships for years, as in 2020 the military branch announced it is designing a system for its unmanned robotic warships that will communicate like human sailors, allowing the craft to safely navigate through waterways.’


B61AE88A-702D-4E01-BB7E-3F27FF5349DC.gif
 
Eat a diick Rob, eat.... a..... diick.

I 100% did say those words... however, you have left off the rest of the statements included with those words. The other words that give it context. Part of the liberal playbook? Your statement would be correct if you actually did the things you just claimed. "Repeating things you say" If you are going to do this then repeat EVERYTHING that was said. When you TELL ME WHAT I MEANT then YOU ARE SPEAKING FOR ME. It is very concerning that you don't know the difference.
You seemingly don't understand the concept of "context". If you say pot is not a drug, there should be no "context" that changes that. If there is, then you should not be making the statement in the first place.

It's a definitive statement that should be able to stand on its own. If you want "context" to alter the meaning, then you really shouldn't make the statement in the first place.
If you say "pot is not a drug", then that is where you stand. That is what you MEAN.
If you said "Pot is not a drug except when used for illicit purposes." and I only quoted "Pot is not a drug", then i would be taking your words out of CONTEXT and creating a new meaning from them. I did not such thing and I do no such thing when I repeat your words or the claims you make.

I haven't, and I won't.
 
‘The Navy has been working on robotic warships for years, as in 2020 the military branch announced it is designing a system for its unmanned robotic warships that will communicate like human sailors, allowing the craft to safely navigate through waterways.’


View attachment 41063
Nice followup to your "post something worth reading" demand.
I'm sure there are lost of folks folks here who never saw Terminator or any of your dozens of past posts with the same dumb picture. You really nailed it with this one!
 
You seemingly don't understand the concept of "context". If you say pot is not a drug, there should be no "context" that changes that. If there is, then you should not be making the statement in the first place.

It's a definitive statement that should be able to stand on its own. If you want "context" to alter the meaning, then you really shouldn't make the statement in the first place.
If you say "pot is not a drug", then that is where you stand. That is what you MEAN.
If you said "Pot is not a drug except when used for illicit purposes." and I only quoted "Pot is not a drug", then i would be taking your words out of CONTEXT and creating a new meaning from them. I did not such thing and I do no such thing when I repeat your words or the claims you make.

I haven't, and I won't.
Again you don't know how to quote or pay attention. Stop trying to correct me if you are going to do it incorrectly.

How about YOU stop being so painfully ANAL before YOU get Monkeypox. Here, follow this link... perhaps there is a forum there that would better fit you.

 
Again you don't know how to quote or pay attention. Stop trying to correct me if you are going to do it incorrectly.

How about YOU stop being so painfully ANAL before YOU get Monkeypox. Here, follow this link... perhaps there is a forum there that would better fit you.

You get so triggered when it is pointed out that you don't understand concepts like "context" and "quote" and "comprehend", and then you simply lash out like a child.
Above is a quote of your entire post, and here is a quote of a sentence within that post: "Again you don't know how to quote or pay attention."

Just like the word "bill", there can be several meanings and methods.

Just a suggestion, but maybe you should expand your knowledge so: 1) You can be better at arguing your theories 2) Post less incorrect stuff that you can be called out on. 3) be less angry that you are not cognizant of the concepts being discussed.

it wouldn't cost you anything to TRY.
 
You get so triggered when it is pointed out that you don't understand concepts like "context" and "quote" and "comprehend", and then you simply lash out like a child.

Just a suggestion, but maybe you should expand your knowledge so: 1) You can be better at arguing your theories 2) Post less incorrect stuff that you can be called out on.

it wouldn't cost you anything to TRY.
No, I am good to go. You will not flip your ignorance on me.

I will make this statement. You fail 99.4% of the time when you attempt to quote me or correct me.
 
No, I am good to go. You will not flip your ignorance on me.

I will make this statement. You fail 99.4% of the time when you attempt to quote me or correct me.
Well, at least you were correct when you called it a “statement”, but the statement itself is wildly inaccurate.

You can’t say a quote is wrong when the quote is an exact duplication of your words, enclosed in quotation marks. That’s precisely how quotes work. 🤦🏼‍♂️

Quote - repeat or copy out (a group of words from a text or speech), typically with an indication that one is not the original author or speaker.
 
Well, at least you were correct when you called it a “statement”, but the statement itself is wildly inaccurate.

You can’t say a quote is wrong when the quote is an exact duplication of your words, enclosed in quotation marks. That’s precisely how quotes work. 🤦🏼‍♂️

Not what you do. You leave out words purposely which makes the intended meaning look different, typically so it supports YOUR argument.

Quote - repeat or copy out (a group of words from a text or speech), typically with an indication that one is not the original author or speaker.

Stop trying to teach me. I already know what the meaning of the word Quote is. Eat a diick.
 
Well, at least you were correct when you called it a “statement”, but the statement itself is wildly inaccurate.

You can’t say a quote is wrong when the quote is an exact duplication of your words, enclosed in quotation marks. That’s precisely how quotes work. 🤦🏼‍♂️

Not what you do. You leave out words purposely which makes the intended meaning look different, typically so it supports YOUR argument.

Quote - repeat or copy out (a group of words from a text or speech), typically with an indication that one is not the original author or speaker.

Stop trying to teach me. I already know what the meaning of the word Quote is. Eat a diick.
Nope. I have never made an edited quote of your words. I quote them exactly as they are posted by you.
You can look at every single time I have quoted you, and you will see that. I may be a lot of things, but a liar isn't one of them.

I would gladly link every single time I have posted a quote of something you have put on this thread. There is not a single instance where you could say I modified the words I have quoted. NOT ONE.

This is yet another instance where you make a claim that you can't back with evidence because the claim is patently false. Don't do that. It reflects poorly on you as a person.
 
Nope. I have never made an edited quote of your words. I quote them exactly as they are posted by you.
You can look at every single time I have quoted you, and you will see that. I may be a lot of things, but a liar isn't one of them.

I would gladly link every single time I have posted a quote of something you have put on this thread. There is not a single instance where you could say I modified the words I have quoted. NOT ONE.

This is yet another instance where you make a claim that you can't back with evidence because the claim is patently false. Don't do that. It reflects poorly on you as a person.
Actually you have done it or I wouldn't bring it up so many times. I have looked at every single time you have attempted to quote me. I will encourage you to just stop now.

Unless you go back and edit every time you have attempted to quote me they will not match up. As I have said, there is but a hand full of times where you actually quoted me word for word.

Why don't you just leave it alone now.
 
Actually you have done it or I wouldn't bring it up so many times. I have looked at every single time you have attempted to quote me. I will encourage you to just stop now.

Unless you go back and edit every time you have attempted to quote me they will not match up. As I have said, there is but a hand full of times where you actually quoted me word for word.

Why don't you just leave it alone now.
The gauntlet has been thrown.
Present a minimum of two examples where I have quoted your words but have modified the text that is within the quote to be different than what you originally posted.

Provide the post number if you are not using the site software to quote the post.
 
'Ukraine’s tactics have violated international humanitarian law as they’ve turned civilian objects into military targets. The ensuing Russian strikes in populated areas have killed civilians and destroyed civilian infrastructure.'


A country at war not following the rules. No way!!! Clearly this is the fault of Dems and their ignore crime approach to law enforcement.
 
Pot is a plant. It is illegal by Federal Law, even if some states make it legal.
You don't consider it a drug, but you feel you know enough about the vax to determine it doesn't work, the stats regarding efficacy were falsified, and the medical science community are all in on the scam.

Do you not see a dichotomy there?

Can't we all agree pot is in a unique category, more like alcohol than a "drug?" Especially since it's legal in about half the states.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
968,770
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_1882.jpeg

slater

    Oct 4, 2025
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20251004_120904_Photo Translator.jpg

1aespinoza

    Oct 4, 2025
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top