Winners only.

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Are you o.k. if parents let their 12 year old boy look at Playboy or Hustler? If not, what would your punishment be for the parents? Should we take the child away from the parents?

This wasn't a 12 year old boy who found daddy's Playboy stash. This was a ~5 year girl somewhere where she clearly shouldn't be.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The priest that touch kids should be hung...just like anybody that does as well...

I really hope you're just trying to to find an argument for arguments sake...that fact that there's pedos in the Vatican doesn't make holding sexualized events for kids ok (and frankly it doesn't matter who holds the event, it's fckn wrong)...

Doesn't even matter that it was ***** event. I could care less about the guy/gal's ****** orientation, biological gender, etc. That is not the right environment for a ~5 year old girl.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

This wasn't a 12 year old boy who found daddy's Playboy stash. This was a ~5 year girl somewhere where she clearly shouldn't be.

I was about 8 when all the kids got locked outside while all the parents got high on brownies and watched Helter Skelter. I guess that taught all of us kids to be drug addicts.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

The article says it's a weekly drag bunch. The owner/manager/staff should not have let children in during their weekly drag show. Not a fan of the law per se, but these guys should lose their liquor license IMHO, or at least pay a hefty fine.

What exactly were the doing with the kids that was ******? Did any kids get ***** or molested? Were they forcing the little boys to kiss other little boys? Were they forcing the little girls to kiss other little girls? Just curious.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

I leave other parents alone. I'm not going to tell anybody how to raise their own kids. Should we send child services to the family that makes their kids go to Church three or four times a week? What about the parents that force their kids into sports? What about parents that force their kids to be on a diet? What about parents who force their kids to do all the work around the house and never let them play with friends? What about parents who have loud *** while there kids are listening in the other room? What about parents who are practicing Satanists? Where exactly should we draw the line?

You established your rules when you raised your own kids. Where are your limits?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You established your rules when you raised your own kids. Where are your limits?

Why should he establish limits when the courts can do it for us?
Up next is our right to use birth control. Following that, maybe they can tell us what religion we have to follow.

Nothing like having the immoral minority decide what goes for the country:
“In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell,” he (Judge Clarence Thomas) wrote, referring to the Supreme Court cases that found a privacy-enshrined right to contraception, ****** contact with someone of the same ***, and same-*** marriage.”

He forgot to mention interracial relationships, which fall under the same legal principle.
Convenient. And rather selective.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So it’s bad to attack the church for actually harboring molesters and paying people off to keep quiet, but OK to accuse the LBGTQ community of grooming kids for ****** impropriety, just because you assume that is their goal?
Yes, I am bigoted to the ones that have been proved to be dirty but their acts are covered up or attempted to be.
Have you witnessed ****** impropriety from a member of the ***** community?

Of course I have.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Can you prove any of that nonsense that you just stated? Is it just your opinion?

Let me help you Mr. College Ball Player. These are questions... denoted by the ?'s They are not accusations to be proven or disproved.

So to directly answer your questions. No I can not prove anything I stated. This is just the nature of a question... it seeks AN answer, not AN argument.

No, these questions are not my opinions, they are questions - a sentence worded or expressed so as to elicit information.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The ***** community is teaching kids to **** children?

So far you have been great at reading, comprehension and being able to see both sides of the conversation. However, this question seems to be a deviation from your normal responses. I did not say the community as a whole which is what your phrasing is suggesting. I specifically said those within the community. This is directed literally to those who have done such a thing. They have done this such of thing and I posted about 118 of them being arrested. It is verifiable facts and these people were within this specific community.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I was about 8 when all the kids got locked outside while all the parents got high on brownies and watched Helter Skelter. I guess that taught all of us kids to be drug addicts.

So because you had sh!tty parents...it's ok...

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

Why should he establish limits when the courts can do it for us?
Up next is our right to use birth control. Following that, maybe they can tell us what religion we have to follow.

Nothing like having the immoral minority decide what goes for the country:
“In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell,” he (Judge Clarence Thomas) wrote, referring to the Supreme Court cases that found a privacy-enshrined right to contraception, ****** contact with someone of the same ***, and same-*** marriage.”

He forgot to mention interracial relationships, which fall under the same legal principle.
Convenient. And rather selective.

Talk the big talk. Nobody can make any claims (about raising children) that they didn't value enough to instill on their own child(ren).

I invite you to dispute my actual post rather than reacting to the post that I responded to.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Talk the big talk. Nobody can make any claims (about raising children) that they didn't value enough to instill on their own child(ren).

I invite you to dispute my actual post rather than reacting to the post that I responded to.

“Talk the big talk”?
Am I wrong about the quote of Judge Thomas? Was I too sarcastic in asking why we need to set limits if a conservative court can do it for us?m

My limits would be to educate children instead of trying to hide things with a puritanical approach to life.
Reality exists. Do you think you’re “protecting” a child by denying reality under the guise of a “nice bearded man in the sky” who loves all “he” has created, but demands the followers hate many of the creations?