Winners only.

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

“it would violate the Establishment Clause for the government to compel attendance or financial support of a religious institution as such, for the government to interfere with a religious organization’s selection of clergy or religious doctrine; for religious organizations or figures acting in a religious capacity to exercise governmental power”

Government should make no religious-based laws, religion should not be a part of the operating government.

First the the establishment clause isn't a real clause...it's an interpretation of 1A...

Establishment Clause

www.law.cornell.edu

You can read more here...but the clause essentially says you can't favor one religion over another in regards to policy...

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I’m king c-c-cornholio

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

First the the establishment clause isn't a real clause...it's an interpretation of 1A...

Establishment Clause

www.law.cornell.edu

You can read more here...but the clause essentially says you can't favor one religion over another in regards to policy...

BINGO. No religion-based laws (either for or against).
Ridiculous, but imagine laws that require people to follow the Ten Commandments. Get arrested for infidelity. Or outlawing wearing religion-required clothing or grooming. Get arrested for having payos.
Bad news.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

BINGO. No religion-based laws (either for or against).
Ridiculous, but imagine laws that require people to follow the Ten Commandments. Get arrested for infidelity. Or outlawing wearing religion-required clothing. Get arrested for having payos.
Bad news.

As long as the law doesn't favor one religion over another a religious law would be permissible...a law forcing people to follow the 10 commandments wouldn't stand because that would favor one or more religions over others...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

No you dumb ***, that is your view and interpretation of what I said. All you have to do is read what I said and understand it, which you clearly can't do, and you should know where I stand. You are doing NOTHING but using your feelings. Not one rational thought on this topic. If you aren't capable of rational thought you probably shouldn't be responding.

"ThxOne said he didn't see a person do something but we told him they did it and he won't believe us"

You know why cops ask you if you saw something happen after you call them? Because if you didn't see it happen then it's just your word... they will need PROOF before making an arrest.

Answer the question. What proof did they have to convict Mike Tyson? Rapes don't happen in front of people kid. Keep spewing your Bulllshit. What evidence did they have against Epstein that wasn't a girls/woman's words? Please enlighten us.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Really, they only do it in private? People get ***** in public all the time, there is video evidence of such acts. Do you think all **** is only of children by sneaky uncles or something?

Please show me some videos of public rapes where the guy was convicted. I'll wait.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Answer the question. What proof did they have to convict Mike Tyson? Rapes don't happen in front of people kid. Keep spewing your Bulllshit. What evidence did they have against Epstein that wasn't a girls/woman's words? Please enlighten us.

What do I care about Tyson?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

This back and forth is because you are an ignorant child. You don't pay attention to post, you ignore context, then you lash out because I don't agree with you and your view that all men accused of **** should be killed on site. Women lie all the time about being *****. Period. If you want to live in a fantasy world where you think all women who yell **** are telling the truth go right ahead. At this point you are acting like a cuckold simp. Grow a pair of balls and meet the rest of us back here in reality.

I'm totally in reality kid. You are the own saying that unless a woman get's ***** on video then you don't believe her. Unless it's your daughter of course. I hope common sense makes a comeback at some point.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

We honestly don't know what all they had on epstein his "*******" shut that down...but he did have a propensity to film...so they may have had that...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Please show me some videos of public rapes where the guy was convicted. I'll wait.

Yeah lol show you videos... I am sure EVERYONE here is saying to themselves... what, so you can say Thx was in possession of **** videos!! Eat shit you emo simp.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

What do I care about Tyson?

Because you can't. What proof did they have against Epstein that wasn't a woman's words? What 3vidence did they have against Winstein that wasn't a woman's words?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I'm totally in reality kid. You are the own saying that unless a woman get's ***** on video then you don't believe her. Unless it's your daughter of course. I hope common sense makes a comeback at some point.

Show me the PROOF that is what I said or stfu idiot.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Yeah lol show you videos... I am sure EVERYONE here is saying to themselves... what, so you can say Thx was in possession of **** videos!! Eat shit you emo simp.

Because you can't. Keep flapping your gums.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Because you can't. What proof did they have against Epstein that wasn't a woman's words? What 3vidence did they have against Winstein that wasn't a woman's words?

Again, what do I care. Not my life, not my problem. But that is your problem isn't it? You want to make everything your life.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Show me the PROOF that is what I said or stfu idiot.

You said that you will never take a woman's word for it. You want a video I guess. What kind of proof would you accept?