Words were not the cause of death...Would he have did it without her words? Yes or no.
Words were not the cause of death...Would he have did it without her words? Yes or no.
Sorry Bobby long week at workHe did. Whether you want to say directly or indirectly is up to you. BTW, I am the Bobby that you speak of.
Words were not the cause of death...
Sorry Bobby long week at work![]()
Bucko putting up a clown face emoji and quoting Nazi conspiracy theory against facts is neither “clowning” nor “owning” me.
The grammar and typo thing is not a “gotcha’ “; it is simply pointing out that people in a glass house shouldn’t throw stones.
Don’t make errors with the same words you are using to call people “stupid”.
It’s common sense. The biggest problem with common sense is that it isn’t.
It's been triple digits here with humidity...it sukks azz...I miss winterI hear ya. I work outside and I'm 53. I think the lowest degree this last week was 108. Come get you some!![]()
No matter what somebody says to you...while it may influence you one way or another...your response to it is your decision...ultimately everybody is responsible for their own actions...not the words of others...Neither is a plane crash. Neitger is falling from a tall building, neither is getting hit by a truck. Get it yet? It's the indirect cause of death. It's cause and effect. The cause was his words and the effect was eventually death. Why didn't you answer the question. Would he have killed himself without her telling him to get back into the truck?
BOBBY... spellcheck.Neither is a plane crash. Neitger is falling from a tall building, neither is getting hit by a truck. Get it yet? It's the indirect cause of death. It's cause and effect. The cause was his words and the effect was eventually death. Why didn't you answer the question. Would he have killed himself without her telling him to get back into the truck?
You will never find one in a post in which I call someone "stupid", "idiot", "moron", etc.you obviously understood what was typed . . . even the idiot understood what was typed
next time you make a typo ill point it out and you can come sit in the stupid box with me ok?
So, the proof that I provided is incorrect? The court case and conviction never happened?No matter what somebody says to you...while it may influence you one way or another...your response to it is your decision...ultimately everybody is responsible for their own actions...not the words of others...
You never showed a single instance were a word was the cause of death...you tried though...I never claimed you couldn't be convicted over words...So, the proof that I provided is incorrect? The court case and conviction never happened?
Fake news, or just a fabrication on my part?
The conviction happened because the words are considered to have caused a death.You never showed a single instance were a word was the cause of death...you tried though...I never claimed you couldn't be convicted over words...
The reality is this administration is responsible for their actions and those actions include those that helped gas prices in this country increase under Biden.This is just common sense and the current administration did not invent common sense... far from it in fact.
You're spinning off on a tangent. You asked what good the gov't does, then when given an answer that is true, you post this. Common sense or not, is creating laws to reduce pollution "doing good"?
I would not take that stance. No, I do not think that.
That is the stance that your words convey. They paint the picture of you adopting a fully defeatist attitude:"Big picture... none of us will be in the painting. None of these "changes" will benefit any of us. People are still laboring under the delusion that government has our best interest in mind. This government is packed full of corrupt politicians and every one of them have a goal."
Ahhh and there is one of the problems with the current administration and their gas prices. They can, as you just did, use the higher gas prices to make it look more expensive to a greater extent to drive a gas powered car. 200mi is GENEROUS to say the least. My current car has no problem hitting 32mpg and go well over 350 miles on a tank. Your electric is going to have to charge up again and that $.05 per mile is now going to be higher. It is not going to be that much less in the grand picture than my gas sipping economy car.
And..we're back to you thinking the administration sets gas prices. Regardless, let's assume gas is $2.00 per gallon. That would put cost per mile at an average of $.085. That is still a lot more than $.05 no matter how you look at it.
For the average American who drives 39 miles per day, 200 miles on a charge is just fine. It's a logical fallacy (or just bad math) to think that having to charge up increases the cost per mile. If you had a smaller tank, do you think your cost per mile would be higher? I sure hope not.
Michigan is crap. I am a Buckeye and went to OSU. Fuuuuuck Michigan.
I know you're being humorous, but one could say this about plenty of states, especially southern ones.
I said taxpayers should not have to pay for HER CHOICE. I don't care either way if she keeps the demon spawn or not.
Again, you are worried about a non-issue. Taxpayers don't pay for abortion any more than they pay for vasectomies, Viagra, broken legs, heart attacks. If that is the only shit you give about abortion, then you should really just say you have no opinion at all, because your opinion is centered around nothing.