im sorry, but why does everyone on this board have to enlighten you about these policies? You act like you know everything while knowing nothing about anything at the same time
I'm sorry, but I don't just accept what people say as a truth. I like it to be verified, and not by me. Too often, people are just repeating a talking point that they don't even understand, and certainly haven't verified. Hell, we have Supreme Court Judges referencing info that has been proved wildly inaccurate.
here are examples of bad policy that has been created under Bidens administration . . .
"In November 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency
announced new regulations governing methane emissions from oil and gas production, transmission, storage, and distribution that would cost more than $1 billion a year. "
The rest of the headline: "
Reduce Methane and Other Harmful Pollution from the Oil and Natural Gas Industry"
Is this a bad decision because it is a push to reduce the negative environmental impact of the industry, or because it costs the industry money?
Was it similar bad policy when they made it illegal to dump industrial waste in rivers and lakes? That also cost industries billions.
Just trying to determine your basis of determining what constitutes bad policy.
"Last spring, Biden signed a resolution that overturned Trump administration reforms to EPA oil and gas rules. This resolution will
worsen energy poverty, reestablish burdensome regulations, and have a disproportionate impact on small businesses. "
This is a quote from a letter to congress written by a member of "Americans For Prosperity". Such a letter is not really a proof of anything, regardless WHAT the claims therein are. I think you would agree.
"In April 2021, without the consent of Congress, Biden rejoined the Paris agreement, which
will result in onerous new regulations that could raise energy costs. "
Also a quote from a press release by the same group. A press release with claims made by someone is not really proof of anything. Yes?
"The president has created several bodies within the White House charged with creating new policies to regulate energy. The people who run these councils are unelected and do not need Senate confirmation, but they have been given
broad powers to come up with new executive actions — which do not need consent from Congress — to regulate U.S. energy production."
Also a quote from a press release by the same group.
"The Biden
administration has failed to take adequate action on annual requirements and small refinery waivers for the Renewable Fuel Standard and in providing regulatory relief from this biofuel mandate due to
economic hardship. His EPA has
finalized a new rule regulating greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks. That single regulation could raise the average vehicle price by $1,000. "
Also a quote from a press release by the same group
"In May 2021, Biden issued a sweeping executive order that mobilized federal agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, to enforce mandates on businesses, insurers, retirement funds, and suppliers. These policies
will stifle innovation critical to improving the environment and will
increase costs for a wide variety of businesses. "
Also a quote from a press release by the same group
Do i have to keep going??????????
Given that pretty much all of your proof so far is unsubstantiated claims made by a group called "AFP", I would say "Yes; keep going". The one legit piece of info is that anti-pollution laws became stricter, but I'm interested in why reducing pollution is bad.
Let's keep the dialogue going.
