ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
How long ago was that post... that topic? Grasping at anything now are you? Even old shit?
- Status
ThxOne
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Do you know what a lease is? Explain please.
Do you know what a permit is? Explain please.
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
What a f*cking clown show.
‘Biden’s has plans to issue the emergency declaration, the Associated Press confirms, but will likely make the move following the Massachusetts visit to promote his efforts to combat climate change…’
www.thegatewaypundit.com
‘Biden’s has plans to issue the emergency declaration, the Associated Press confirms, but will likely make the move following the Massachusetts visit to promote his efforts to combat climate change…’
REPORT: Biden May Declare 'National Climate Emergency' THIS WEEK | The Gateway Pundit | by Alicia Powe
Joe Biden may consider declaring a climate emergency this week by issuing an executive order.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
‘Russia's defense ministry has issued a formal order for Russian troops to target Ukraine's long-range weapons and artillery supplied by the West, specifically the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) provided by the United States.’
www.zerohedge.com
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
im sorry, but why does everyone on this board have to enlighten you about these policies? You act like you know everything while knowing nothing about anything at the same time
here are examples of bad policy that has been created under Bidens administration . . .
"In November 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency announced new regulations governing methane emissions from oil and gas production, transmission, storage, and distribution that would cost more than $1 billion a year. "
"Last spring, Biden signed a resolution that overturned Trump administration reforms to EPA oil and gas rules. This resolution will worsen energy poverty, reestablish burdensome regulations, and have a disproportionate impact on small businesses. "
"In April 2021, without the consent of Congress, Biden rejoined the Paris agreement, which will result in onerous new regulations that could raise energy costs. "
"The president has created several bodies within the White House charged with creating new policies to regulate energy. The people who run these councils are unelected and do not need Senate confirmation, but they have been given broad powers to come up with new executive actions — which do not need consent from Congress — to regulate U.S. energy production."
"The Biden administration has failed to take adequate action on annual requirements and small refinery waivers for the Renewable Fuel Standard and in providing regulatory relief from this biofuel mandate due to economic hardship. His EPA has finalized a new rule regulating greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks. That single regulation could raise the average vehicle price by $1,000. "
"In May 2021, Biden issued a sweeping executive order that mobilized federal agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, to enforce mandates on businesses, insurers, retirement funds, and suppliers. These policies will stifle innovation critical to improving the environment and will increase costs for a wide variety of businesses. "
Do i have to keep going??????????
im sorry, but why does everyone on this board have to enlighten you about these policies? You act like you know everything while knowing nothing about anything at the same time
I'm sorry, but I don't just accept what people say as a truth. I like it to be verified, and not by me. Too often, people are just repeating a talking point that they don't even understand, and certainly haven't verified. Hell, we have Supreme Court Judges referencing info that has been proved wildly inaccurate.
here are examples of bad policy that has been created under Bidens administration . . .
"In November 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency announced new regulations governing methane emissions from oil and gas production, transmission, storage, and distribution that would cost more than $1 billion a year. "
The rest of the headline: "Reduce Methane and Other Harmful Pollution from the Oil and Natural Gas Industry"
Is this a bad decision because it is a push to reduce the negative environmental impact of the industry, or because it costs the industry money?
Was it similar bad policy when they made it illegal to dump industrial waste in rivers and lakes? That also cost industries billions.
Just trying to determine your basis of determining what constitutes bad policy.
"Last spring, Biden signed a resolution that overturned Trump administration reforms to EPA oil and gas rules. This resolution will worsen energy poverty, reestablish burdensome regulations, and have a disproportionate impact on small businesses. "
This is a quote from a letter to congress written by a member of "Americans For Prosperity". Such a letter is not really a proof of anything, regardless WHAT the claims therein are. I think you would agree.
"In April 2021, without the consent of Congress, Biden rejoined the Paris agreement, which will result in onerous new regulations that could raise energy costs. "
Also a quote from a press release by the same group. A press release with claims made by someone is not really proof of anything. Yes?
"The president has created several bodies within the White House charged with creating new policies to regulate energy. The people who run these councils are unelected and do not need Senate confirmation, but they have been given broad powers to come up with new executive actions — which do not need consent from Congress — to regulate U.S. energy production."
Also a quote from a press release by the same group.
"The Biden administration has failed to take adequate action on annual requirements and small refinery waivers for the Renewable Fuel Standard and in providing regulatory relief from this biofuel mandate due to economic hardship. His EPA has finalized a new rule regulating greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks. That single regulation could raise the average vehicle price by $1,000. "
Also a quote from a press release by the same group
"In May 2021, Biden issued a sweeping executive order that mobilized federal agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, to enforce mandates on businesses, insurers, retirement funds, and suppliers. These policies will stifle innovation critical to improving the environment and will increase costs for a wide variety of businesses. "
Also a quote from a press release by the same group
Do i have to keep going??????????
Given that pretty much all of your proof so far is unsubstantiated claims made by a group called "AFP", I would say "Yes; keep going". The one legit piece of info is that anti-pollution laws became stricter, but I'm interested in why reducing pollution is bad.
Let's keep the dialogue going.
I'm sorry, but I don't just accept what people say as a truth. I like it to be verified, and not by me. Too often, people are just repeating a talking point that they don't even understand, and certainly haven't verified. Hell, we have Supreme Court Judges referencing info that has been proved wildly inaccurate.
here are examples of bad policy that has been created under Bidens administration . . .
"In November 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency announced new regulations governing methane emissions from oil and gas production, transmission, storage, and distribution that would cost more than $1 billion a year. "
The rest of the headline: "Reduce Methane and Other Harmful Pollution from the Oil and Natural Gas Industry"
Is this a bad decision because it is a push to reduce the negative environmental impact of the industry, or because it costs the industry money?
Was it similar bad policy when they made it illegal to dump industrial waste in rivers and lakes? That also cost industries billions.
Just trying to determine your basis of determining what constitutes bad policy.
"Last spring, Biden signed a resolution that overturned Trump administration reforms to EPA oil and gas rules. This resolution will worsen energy poverty, reestablish burdensome regulations, and have a disproportionate impact on small businesses. "
This is a quote from a letter to congress written by a member of "Americans For Prosperity". Such a letter is not really a proof of anything, regardless WHAT the claims therein are. I think you would agree.
"In April 2021, without the consent of Congress, Biden rejoined the Paris agreement, which will result in onerous new regulations that could raise energy costs. "
Also a quote from a press release by the same group. A press release with claims made by someone is not really proof of anything. Yes?
"The president has created several bodies within the White House charged with creating new policies to regulate energy. The people who run these councils are unelected and do not need Senate confirmation, but they have been given broad powers to come up with new executive actions — which do not need consent from Congress — to regulate U.S. energy production."
Also a quote from a press release by the same group.
"The Biden administration has failed to take adequate action on annual requirements and small refinery waivers for the Renewable Fuel Standard and in providing regulatory relief from this biofuel mandate due to economic hardship. His EPA has finalized a new rule regulating greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks. That single regulation could raise the average vehicle price by $1,000. "
Also a quote from a press release by the same group
"In May 2021, Biden issued a sweeping executive order that mobilized federal agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission, to enforce mandates on businesses, insurers, retirement funds, and suppliers. These policies will stifle innovation critical to improving the environment and will increase costs for a wide variety of businesses. "
Also a quote from a press release by the same group
Do i have to keep going??????????
Given that pretty much all of your proof so far is unsubstantiated claims made by a group called "AFP", I would say "Yes; keep going". The one legit piece of info is that anti-pollution laws became stricter, but I'm interested in why reducing pollution is bad.
Let's keep the dialogue going.
Dude, you can't even speak the language you claim is your native tongue.
Give it up.
"Even old shit". Sorry, your stupidity is still stupidity whether you shared it yesterday or a year ago.
History doesn't change.
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Oh here we go already. I knew your next insult would be to say I can't even speak English. Go beat your dog you troll asss clown. Nobody needs to read anything you have to Google quote.
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Yup and that is all you have to attempt an argument with. Old shit. You got nothing, you are nothing, Biden ain't shit, go eat some more diicks you asss licking troll.
metalheadjoe
10+ year member
Unapologetic prick
You get an “You Know Letters Better Than Thxone” trophy.
Yes, I used “an” incorrectly on purpose. AND I included a word where the letter y is pronounced as a VOWEL and not a consonant (like it is in “you”).
ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
You don't know shit. You know what you can google and no more. Go lick your docks pink rocket you anal loving troll.
Buck
5,000+ posts
little alien on campus
‘China will take “resolute and strong measures” should the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi proceed with reported plans to visit Taiwan, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said Tuesday.’
China threatens 'strong measures' if Pelosi visits Taiwan
China says it will take “resolute and strong measures" should the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi proceed with reported plans to visit Taiwan.
apnews.com
- Status
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
About this thread
- Start date
- Participants
- Who Replied
- Replies
- 33,976
- Views
- 1,113,619
- Last reply date
- Last reply from
- Buck
