Winners only.

Status
Not open for further replies.

So you can understand the 3/5...it isn't the game winner argument you think it is
 
Both of those are unconstitutional...the documents are only evolving when there's an constitutional convention brought together by the states...this "evolving" myth is why we have surveillance from the govt...

You say they're unconstitutional, but you don't get to make that call. The USSC gets to make that call and clearly the USSC was already moving in the direction of not respecting our privacy rights and with Dobbs v Jackson, they've taken another step in that direction. Clearly the Constitution is evolving, you may not like it, you may not think that's what our founding fathers intended, but clearly it is evolving.
 
Why are we fighting for a Liberal World Order? Wtf even is a Liberal World Order? When did that become a governmental reason to wage war? Did our soldiers sign up to fight for the Liberal World Order, too? I mean what really is that? That’s straight from the horse’s mouth; it’s not a “conspiracy theory.”

I'm curious who/what is this "Liberal World Order" our soldiers are fighting for. The invasion of Iraq came from conservatives. The war on terror - again conservatives.
 
You honestly believe the founding documents intended to allow fed surveillance? Just because something has been poorly adjudicated doesn't make it in line with the constitution
 

So you can understand the 3/5...it isn't the game winner argument you think it is

I'm not sure what you point is.... My point was the Constitution has evolved beyond considering blacks 3/5ths of a person for any reason. The Constitution now outlaws slavery and upholds black peoples' right to vote. The article you cited says exactly what I've been saying, so why isn't "3/5ths a game winner?" Furthermore, I'm not trying to win any game. I'm certainly not trying to change anybody's mind. I'm just here to discuss facts and as far as I can see there is no evidence that the constitution and how laws are interpreted are not evolving. I'm sure any doctor who was running an abortion clinic and just found out he has to shut it down thinks the constitution is evolving.
 
At this point Antifa, et al are doing a better job at staying hidden. Furthermore, is an anarchist group really "liberal?" Additionally, their "mission" is slanted a little differently - they're opposing right wing extremism and fascism. Right wingers are opposing gov't. However, they left wing groups definitely turned anti-gov't/anti-establishment during the BLM riots. The Jan 6th pipe bomber strikes me more as an antifa type than a "liberal."

So you’re saying antifa isn’t a leftist group?
 
I'm curious who/what is this "Liberal World Order" our soldiers are fighting for. The invasion of Iraq came from conservatives. The war on terror - again conservatives.

Wrong- there’s not two sides. If you think there are two sides, then I’ve got a field you can graze in. It’s all corrupt, both conservatives and liberals. Who did this war over Ukraine come from? This is also why democracies fail, because it’s not supposed to be a little more than half making decisions over everyone.

Oh, it’s the MIC that Eisenhower warned about that pays BOTH sides to go to war.

That’s the thing-I’m not partisan and have never voted. Anyone acting like one side isn’t corrupted is absurd.
 
Last edited:
The Liberal World Order sounds a lot like…

‘The New Order ( German: Neuordnung) of Europe was the political order which Nazi Germany wanted to impose on the conquered areas under its dominion.’


Oh yeah, is that why Antifa literally uses the same symbology as the Nazi “anti-fascist” group?

Oh no, facts…

38E8CB25-E6FF-4ADC-B7E8-530DF8654EE4.jpeg


6C5449F9-3C9B-4B2B-8C99-DD6CB02875AE.jpeg


Totally nothing to see here 🤡
 
I'm not sure what you point is.... My point was the Constitution has evolved beyond considering blacks 3/5ths of a person for any reason. The Constitution now outlaws slavery and upholds black peoples' right to vote. The article you cited says exactly what I've been saying, so why isn't "3/5ths a game winner?" Furthermore, I'm not trying to win any game. I'm certainly not trying to change anybody's mind. I'm just here to discuss facts and as far as I can see there is no evidence that the constitution and how laws are interpreted are not evolving. I'm sure any doctor who was running an abortion clinic and just found out he has to shut it down thinks the constitution is evolving.

More black abortions happen (per population), because the eugenicists who run Planned Parenthood, like Margaret Sanger and William Gates Sr., want a lower black population. Go back to the American Eugenics Society and it’s roots in starting Planned Parenthood.

So aborting tons of black babies disproportionately is modern? That’s the way we want to evolve, right?
 
I'm sure any doctor who was running an abortion clinic and just found out he has to shut it down thinks the constitution is evolving.

‘Although black Americans comprise 13.4% of the U.S. population, they accounted for 36.0% of the abortions in 2015, which was almost identical to the percentage of abortions (36.9%) that year among white Americans, who make up 76.6% of the population.’

‘The report also showed that the abortion rate among black people (25.1) was significantly higher than that of white people (6.8). Abortion rate, according to the CDC, describes the number of abortions in a certain racial or ethnic group per 1,000 women in that same group.

In addition, the abortion ratio, or the number of abortions per 1,000 live births within a given racial or ethnic group, was much higher among black women (390) than white women (111).’

 
It’s for the Liberal World Order that nobody asked for:

‘A 3 million barrel cut to daily supplies would push benchmark London crude prices that are now around $111 to $190, while the worst-case scenario of 5 million could mean “stratospheric” $380 crude, the analysts wrote.’

 
‘THE future of drone warfare could look like something out of Star Wars with swarms of drones from the air attacking machines in the sea, experts say’


08B07FD9-5E57-4FE2-B06C-1121A2DF9142.jpeg


4ADCF393-A226-4629-BFF2-776128DA208D.gif
 
‘Although black Americans comprise 13.4% of the U.S. population, they accounted for 36.0% of the abortions in 2015, which was almost identical to the percentage of abortions (36.9%) that year among white Americans, who make up 76.6% of the population.’

‘The report also showed that the abortion rate among black people (25.1) was significantly higher than that of white people (6.8). Abortion rate, according to the CDC, describes the number of abortions in a certain racial or ethnic group per 1,000 women in that same group.

In addition, the abortion ratio, or the number of abortions per 1,000 live births within a given racial or ethnic group, was much higher among black women (390) than white women (111).’

I'd like to know the unplanned pregnancy rate by race.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slo_Ride

5,000+ posts
Regulator
Thread starter
Slo_Ride
Joined
Location
ATLANTA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
33,976
Views
1,113,835
Last reply date
Last reply from
Buck
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top